Things you've always wondered about in sci-fi movies

In space movies when running from insane stalker/hunters, why don't they just set their ship on auto pilot and send it off somewhere while they stay on their newly found primitive world. No tech, no tracking. I don't care how good your tracking is, you can't find one organic lifeform on a planet in the middle of nowhere.
Guessing that the movie wouldn’t be ‘made’ then, maybe..., it’s too realistic !?
It’s not ‘simple’ to see things at the moment they’re happening most of the time, and hindsight isn’t always accurate, but always too late.
‘Reality’ has shown us that fact at least.
 
Guessing that the movie wouldn’t be ‘made’ then, maybe..., it’s too realistic !?
It’s not ‘simple’ to see things at the moment they’re happening most of the time, and hindsight isn’t always accurate, but always too late.
‘Reality’ has shown us that fact at least.
It's like all the memes where all Anakin's friends tell him that in reality he can stop being a Jedi and go off to have a normal life, his choice. Wouldn't be the first Jedi to leave the order. But then, you have no movie.
 
A big one that never made sense:
You need to land in a specific place, on flat, open ground and stealth isn't needed.
SO, you land so far away, your lander is out of sight from where you want to go. And if course your pilot walks out with you, leaving the lander just sitting there.
Why, why, WHY? I kept thinking "Galaxy Quest" missed a real comedic moment by not addressing the very same thing when they land looking for that sphere!
On those rare occasions I used helos in the Army, we always landed just out of the rotor arc (with about 20 feet for safety) from where we wanted to be standing, unless it was a hot LZ!
And never mind the idea of leaving the lander unguarded. Just once on a Trek episode, I wanted someone to come back to the shuttle and instead find a smoking crater or better yet, find it stripped down to the frame (sitting on whatever aliens use for concrete blocks)
 
And in Star Wars universe, they could even have legs
Exactly.
In Empire Strikes Back, I always assumed that General Veers landed his force on Hoth outside of the area covered by that energy shield they talked about, then his forces had to move across the surface to their target area.
Either that, or that the walkers needed to be offloaded from a larger transport that was vulnerable on the ground.
As the nephew of WW2 vets who each told me stories about how to conduct amphibious operations, I assumed this even as a kid when I first saw that movie.
In Return of Jedi, they wanted to sneak into the shield generator control area to surprise the crew, so walking a distance from the lander made a lot of sense (though walking around with white and gold droids was insane). There are a few such cases in sci-fi where your lander should be outside of sight of the enemy, but the majority of the time it's just bad writing from a tactical standpoint.
I remember seeing, "Starship Troopers" with some fellow ROTC cadets as I was working toward being an Army LT at that time (I was halfway through my senior year when it came out), and as we left the theater, several of them noted how on Klendathu, the landers came down right where they wanted the soldiers. These were guys who weren't even sci-fi fans as I was/am, and they commented how smart that was, unlike other examples in sci-fi even they could think of!
 
I always thought it would've been cool (and make more sense) if Artoo and Threepio had been painted camo for the Endor mission. Have it be partially cleaned off for the celebration scene.

I guess the Ewok god thing might not have worked though.
 
Exactly.
In Empire Strikes Back, I always assumed that General Veers landed his force on Hoth outside of the area covered by that energy shield they talked about, then his forces had to move across the surface to their target area.
Either that, or that the walkers needed to be offloaded from a larger transport that was vulnerable on the ground.
As the nephew of WW2 vets who each told me stories about how to conduct amphibious operations, I assumed this even as a kid when I first saw that movie.
In Return of Jedi, they wanted to sneak into the shield generator control area to surprise the crew, so walking a distance from the lander made a lot of sense (though walking around with white and gold droids was insane). There are a few such cases in sci-fi where your lander should be outside of sight of the enemy, but the majority of the time it's just bad writing from a tactical standpoint.
I remember seeing, "Starship Troopers" with some fellow ROTC cadets as I was working toward being an Army LT at that time (I was halfway through my senior year when it came out), and as we left the theater, several of them noted how on Klendathu, the landers came down right where they wanted the soldiers. These were guys who weren't even sci-fi fans as I was/am, and they commented how smart that was, unlike other examples in sci-fi even they could think of!
But then they show that they have no concept of combined arms and rely almost solely on light infantry. Infantry that requires a mag dump from an entire squad just to kill one of the enemy. Given that, I was always surprised that humanity managed to survive as long as they had in the movies.
 
Last edited:
But then they show that they have no concept of combined arms and rely almost solely on light infantry. Infantry that require a mag dump from an entire squad just to kill one of the enemy. Given that, I always thought that humanity managed to survive as long as they had in the movies.
You know... if the enemy was so resilient that they needed an entire squad to empty their ammo just to take out one of them, then maybe it's time for their armed forces to either upgrade their main rifle, or nuke the planet from orbit.

You know...it's the only way to be sure. :)
 
IMO 'Starship Troopers' is a better movie because the combat didn't make any friggin sense.

It's the propaganda angle. I feel like the top brass must have had the discussion: "Yeah we could nuke the site from orbit and get rid of the whole bug problem. But that wouldn't stir up nationalist bug-hate and make recruiting material. This bug attack is a nice useful disaster in the making - that is, if we don't barge in there with our tactical nukes and prevent it."
 
You know... if the enemy was so resilient that they needed an entire squad to empty their ammo just to take out one of them, then maybe it's time for their armed forces to either upgrade their main rifle, or nuke the planet from orbit.

You know...it's the only way to be sure. :)
But at least in Empire Strikes Back, they did mention the energy field, which specifically was powerful enough to withstand any bombardment, as Veers reported before Vader ordered a surface attack.
 
But at least in Empire Strikes Back, they did mention the energy field, which specifically was powerful enough to withstand any bombardment, as Veers reported before Vader ordered a surface attack.
Yeah, I was talking about Starship Troopers though (conversation veered that way towards the bugs). Concerning ESB: that was pretty much having to deal with Admiral Ozzel being a complete twit. Because of his idiocy, they could not use air/ space forces and were limited to ground assault.
 
Starship Troopers was a travesty. Just read the book. Nothing about that movie was right. Where was the powered armor? Even the anime had powered armor.

Imagine a movie called the Invincible Iron Man and it is just a guy running around in camo body armor!
 
I give the movie a surprising amount of "passes" on all that. They did run out of money to do ape suits after they figured out all the bug special effects. and it's at least an enjoyable movie, despite being greatly departed from a lot of the book. They leaned in and did well where they could; which was mostly the absurdist dialogue and over patriotic motivation. Most book to movie adaptations aren't even enjoyable while they're screwing it up. :p
 
Last edited:
Back
Top