But your local PD is going to have semi-auto AR15s, not M16s or M4s that are 3 round burst capable if not fully auto.
Dunno - I'm sure some PDs may have burst cams in their patrol ARs, but not the auto disconnector (two different mechanisms.)
(Note that this doesn't change the fact that I think PDs should go back to M1911 or wheelguns as general issue, given their track records of late. "Spray and pray" is not an acceptable response strategy to a hot shooter incident.)
I've noted that a lot of PDs had also started going over to "patrol carbines" (M4gery, Mini-14, some Mini-30) to replace the shotgun in patrol cars. Mixed feelings - while I do like the idea of reducing "spray damage potential" from the 12ga 0 buckshot rounds, what good is it going to do if they don't get any practice
firing under stress?
That's where they fail, usually - annual quals and practise are done as regular point-shooting, they may have a "Hogan's Alley" range if they're lucky. But, how much firing is done under stress?
You want to see the difference? Set up two targets outdoors - identical targets, identical ranges. Load two magazines with five rounds each. Measure off a point 100m from your firing point.
Fire the first magazine for record. I'll be nice, and allow you two seconds per shot fired.
Now, run -
run! - flat-out to that 100m point
and back! A full-on 200m windsprint!
Then, pick up your sidearm, put the other loaded mag in, and fire off the five rounds in five seconds.
Your target will probably look like someone fired a shotgun at it.
(As a trainer, I cringe every time I see a "Marksman" award on a cop, because I just
know it wasn't earned with stress shooting. And, "combat firing" has as much bearing on "range qualification" as "chow hall food" has on "fine dining." This is why, once the basics were handled, I ramped up conditions to somewhere between "extremely difficult" and "downright impossible." This is also why people I'd trained would
survive.)
I wouldn't have a problem with cops having all this firepower at their disposal,
iff they were properly trained in its use, and that doesn't mean just range-qualified. (No, that wasn't a typo. I did "iff" on purpose, can you tell me why?

) If your training isn't made difficult, you need to rewrite the training programme (in Basic, I shot 385/400-22X. At 100m. Without spectacles. Myopic.)
I guess I'm cranky, but I can't help but wonder if they actually got training in most movies, or if they're simply emulating "real-life heroes."
(That's one thing that pleased me about Doom. I didn't watch it for stellar acting - I watched it because I'm a fan of the series, and I do enjoy a good shoot-em-up from time to time. Plus, Dwayne Johnson isn't a bad actor. Other things:
- First project I saw Rosamund Pike in - she's worth watching.
- Ditto Karl Urban - who cemented his worth as an actor in Dredd and Star Trek.
- It was good seeing that the actors actually got some training in "shoot & scoot" and basic military tactics - I don't recall the name, but they had an SAS consultant to train them, kinda like the cast of The Rock had Harry the Hump. Made a big difference.)
- I thought the "first-person shooter" interlude was a nice touch.
- This was the second movie (counting The Matrix trilogy as a single effort) where "Wire-Fu" made sense, once C24 had been administered.
- Despite the cast probably having been "thrown together," they did do a good job of portraying the sort of banter you'd get in most small units - right down to constantly razzing "The Kid," Goat's Bible-thumping against Portman's perversion, and the like.)
Critics panned it - but it's common for me to enjoy something that critics have panned. I've gone to see movies
because the critics have panned it, and usually enjoyed it after.
Speaking of - can we make movie critics go away? Many of them remind me of a quote from Frank Zappa - "Most rock journalism is people who can't write, interviewing people who can't talk, for people who can't read." That's how I feel about critics, most of the time.
Have I digressed enough? Sorry... Rough day.