THE HOBBIT swords

They have been up for quite a while now, but just an FYI, those are list prices. UC is the manufacturer. Hardly any of their dealers ever ever sell as high as those suggested retail prices.

Slightly OT, does anyone know if any helmets are in the works ?
Which one would you want to see made? There were a gizillion dwarven helms in the prologue, and those modified high elven was helms, but that was about it.
 
The UC versions are. Either UC scabbard will fit the original UC Sting, the MC Collection Sting, or the new Hobbit version.

Thanks for clearing that up Kit! Much appreciated!

I actually much like the Hobbit leather version over the LOTR version.
 
I love how much sense Orcrist makes. I wasn't sold on the single edge when i first saw it.
But when i thought about it, it's a cleaver so of course its single edged.
Also Orcrist almost looks like the cut sting in half doesn't it?
 
its an interesting change, but the only part of it that bugs me is the dragon tooth handle

seems a little more hoaky than the LOTR swords
 
Everything there is awesome, but almost 8k for Sting is a bit too much. I think I can come up with some way to make a affordable one.
 
The 8k sting must be from the SwordMasters collection by Peter Lyon, they are hand-made from the maker of the original but yes still very expensive. Dwalin's axes seem to be an easy build, might have to start a WIP on this and save the ridiculous 399 USD for a urethane replica. Scratch built may look better with real leather strap handles rather than the molded grip on Weta's.

Axes of Dwalin the Dwarf
 
its an interesting change, but the only part of it that bugs me is the dragon tooth handle

seems a little more hoaky than the LOTR swords

Perhaps my lore is weak, but didn't the dragon kick their collective asses? I would think it a bit hard to take a trophy whilst being being burnt alive...
 
When you say dragon, guessing you mean Smaug?, Orcrist is very old, made by the Elves of Gondolin in the First Age of Middle-Earth well before Smaug and the fall of Erebor. Hopefully my lore is correct :lol
 
Scatha was slain by a Northman, and the dragon's teeth were given to the Dwarves as an insult, so that's unlikely. Highly unlikely the tooth would have been from the time of Gondolin either. Glaurung was the only Dragon to have been slain, but Gondolin was sealed at that time. Dragons were among the forces that destroyed Gondolin, so it did not come from one of those either. Very unlikely that tooth could be the original handle.

It could have come from a dragon slain during the War of Wrath, although not Angcalagon. The tooth could have come into Dwarven or Elven hands from this war and Orcrist been rehandled after the war. Although that means Orcrist was recovered from the Orcs or a dragon very soon after Gondolin, since that city was destroyed a little over 30 years before. That seems unlikely to me.

Orcrist was taken from Gondolin by Orcs or dragons, some 6400 years before Gandalf found it. It likely passed through many owners in that time, and even though the forged Elven steel would survive through the millennia, the hilt grip would have likely been reworked and replaced several times.

The Dwarves of the North had many run-ins with Orcs and Dragons, and you can even trace how Orcrist could have passed through that region by Orcs and come into the hands of the Dwarves if you know your Tolkien. The tooth and inscription could have been added in this period when it was used in the slaying of a dragon by the Dwarves. There are also references in The Hobbit book about the sword having been used against the Orcs recently - the Goblins in Moria recognized it on sight. That would have been the War of the Dwarves and Orcs, about 148 years earlier. Plenty of time, opportunity, and reasons this particular handle and the Sindarin inscription referencing it could have been added to Orcrist.

At some point a group of trolls captured the Dwarf (or possibly and Elf) in possession of it and took the sword as plunder. Things up North started to go bad with the orcs and the Necromancer growing stronger, so those trolls probably came down from the North (as Elrond relates), where Thorin and Co ran into them.
 
Last edited:
A little off topic here, but can someone explain to me why the Contract replica at WETA is so much more expensive than the one at the Hobbit Shop? Is it because one was made by WETA and other not?

Anyway, I really enjoyed having the swords play a decent part of the movie. I'll likely include one of them in my new Hobbit display.
 
A little off topic here, but can someone explain to me why the Contract replica at WETA is so much more expensive than the one at the Hobbit Shop? Is it because one was made by WETA and other not?

Anyway, I really enjoyed having the swords play a decent part of the movie. I'll likely include one of them in my new Hobbit display.

I dont have the WETA version, only the Noble contract... But I guess the WETA contract looks more like a real old contract from middleearth... I think the aging is better, the paper is more realistic like a real parchment paper; the noble is just a replica, made from printed paper, produced in a cheaper printing method than the WETA contract...
 
The Weta version is made from the exact same prop master who made the original for the film. The replica is printed and hand aged, distressed as well hand sewn together with wax used to seal the ends. Its also made with very heavy weight paper. There is a huge difference, but still not sure it warrants the very large price tag.
 
Nope. BudK is legit - they actually own United Cutlery now, I believe.

Now that you mention it I believe you are right. It just seems a bit amazing that BudK can list it at nearly half the MSRP that is even listed on the main UC site.
 
Back
Top