I have to say though that the Mole scanner works better with fewer slices, as multiple slices overlapping has a tendency to soften the final fuse. But with a complex shape like the endoskull it is very hard to get all areas and angles in one scan session, so that is just something you'd have to live with.
If I worked with it more I'm sure I can get more efficient scans than I've done currently.
The Einstar can just basically do it in one go, which is wild. But that's what you get from a scanner that has software designed to much more expensive scanners. And now that the Mole is no longer sold at a discount, but at about the same price as the Einstar, there really is no reason not to just go with the Einstar, though.
But yes, it is very interesting to see how they compare, as they are both 0.1mm scanners.