STAR WARS Rebels new animated series!

Did anyone else find it rather odd that the cadets would be reporting in to the TIE/flight school wearing full flight gear, helmets and all, and that the head instructor/school commandant walks around in full flight gears sans helmet as well? That really struck me as odd and I couldn't help noticing it all throughout the episode, trivial I know but it's just one of those things that I can't help but to notice.
 
Did anyone else find it rather odd that the cadets would be reporting in to the TIE/flight school wearing full flight gear, helmets and all, and that the head instructor/school commandant walks around in full flight gears sans helmet as well? That really struck me as odd and I couldn't help noticing it all throughout the episode, trivial I know but it's just one of those things that I can't help but to notice.

That's simply limitations of budget and time of animation. It makes it a lot easier. You will notice that Rebel pilots do the same thing and that the rebel trooper helmets are designed in a way that hide any recognizable facial features so that the same animated model can be used over or in groups.
 
Last edited:
I can't believe they used the old Hasbro gimmick of the TIE wings popping off!! As a kid I thought "This is stupid! Why would the wings pop off like that?"

Now we know-- we've come full circle......

I never though of it as an homage to the old toys but now that you mention it... huh.

However I do not think it is stupid. I did not get the idea that it was a standard function but instead a special designed security element for just that particular situation since they suspected such a thing might happen.

However, you never know. There might be mishap conditions that require the ejection of the wings using explosive bolts. I can think of a few scenarios that it might be needed by the pilot. If so, then the act of it be triggered by remote (other than the pilot) would be a special set up for just this occasion. It could also be a special feature in TIEs that are designed as trainers.
 
That's simply limitations of budget and time of animation. It makes it a lot easier. You will notice that Rebel pilots do the same thing and that the rebel trooper helmets are designed in a way that hide any recognizable facial features so that the same animated model can be used over or in groups.

Oh, I understand budget limitations and all that and how, in the case of the TIE pilots, it allows them to use existing models and, in the case of the Rebels, it simplifies the animation and allows them to reuse models, but it still looks odd.
 
Oh, I understand budget limitations and all that and how, in the case of the TIE pilots, it allows them to use existing models and, in the case of the Rebels, it simplifies the animation and allows them to reuse models, but it still looks odd.

Oh, I agree. I think you can get away with it more with imperials as you never see Imperials not wearing their helmets in movies. If the Imperials are like the first order, then they have issues with their members removing heir helmets without permission. I think if you really want to point out what is odd, it's them letting Sabine take her helmet off. But we know they did it so the viewer can identify the characters.

It's more odd to me,when the rebel pilots walk around with helmets on and visors down.

If I could have it my way, I would have liked them to establish individual pilots for Phoenix Squadron. Allow viewers to get to know them a little so that when they get killed off, there is more of an emotional connection. They did this with the various clones in Clone wars.
 
What was even more odd was during that one episode where the Empire had captured some Rebels, including some of the generic helmeted ones, and they were sitting in their cells with their helmets still on. That was beyond explanation for me, I mean, who take prisoners wearing armor, utility belts, and carrying weapons and allows them to keep most of that?
 
BTW...

Did anyone else think to themselves...

When did Conan O"Brien join the Rebellion?

rebels-304-the-antilles-extraction_001e185b.jpg
 
Oh, I agree. I think you can get away with it more with imperials as you never see Imperials not wearing their helmets in movies. If the Imperials are like the first order, then they have issues with their members removing heir helmets without permission. I think if you really want to point out what is odd, it's them letting Sabine take her helmet off. But we know they did it so the viewer can identify the characters.

My problem is more that little things keep getting us a little further away from what John Mollo gave us in the first couple films. It's a problem whenever there's more than one brain working on something. Star Trek suffers from it, too. Over time, little misinterpretations and miscommunications work there way into the fabric of things. It bugs me. *sigh* The pilots we saw in Star Wars were Stormtrooper pilots. The AT-AT drivers we saw in Empire were Stormtrooper armored-vehicle operators. The black uniforms, officer, enlisted, flight ear, or big goofy kabuto helmets were Stormtroopers (they wear other things than the white battle armor at all times).

We saw Clonetroopers in the same sorts of gear, and distinct from the regular military forces that were being assembled for the war.

We also saw non-Stormtrooper armored-vehicle operators in Return of the Jedi. The EU gave us similarly outfitted pilots -- grey jumpsuit, soft flak vest instead of body armor, slightly different life-support gear... Yeah they had red bloodstripes and wore Stormtrooper-style flight helmets, but that was because it was an elite fighter wing, and they did that to show that they were badasses. I was really hoping we might see the cadets in non-Stormtrooper flight gear inspired by that, even if it meant they had gray Rebel-style helmets with smoked visors and air masks that they kept on to streamline production issues.

We also saw, later, and also in the EU, Imperial non-Stormtrooper pilots wearing Stormtrpper-style flight gear, just with the upper part of the faceplate flipped up into the helmet so we could see their faces. This would be that lack-of-communication thing coming up again.

If I could have it my way, I would have liked them to establish individual pilots for Phoenix Squadron. Allow viewers to get to know them a little so that when they get killed off, there is more of an emotional connection. They did this with the various clones in Clone wars.

And Star Wars and Empire. We had some sense of Dutch and Tiree and Pops. We had some sense of Red Leader and Porkins. We definitely had a connection with Biggs. We had a connection with Zev -- he rescued Han and Luke, for crying out loud. I wish they had left in the rest of Hobbie's part, but we still had at least "two fighters against a star destroyer?"... Jedi kinda dropped the ball on all that. We just had faces we'd never seen before declaring they'd been hit before vanishing in a fireball. This feels a bit like that.

--Jonah
 
It actually makes a lot of sense to me. I originally thought, back in 1983, that they made the TIE Interceptors by popping off the TIE Fighters' wings like the Kenner toy and putting the different wing package on for a different mission profile. That would obviously make a weak point where they attach, but the trade-off would be greater flexibility for a base cockpit module.

--Jonah
 
It actually makes a lot of sense to me. I originally thought, back in 1983, that they made the TIE Interceptors by popping off the TIE Fighters' wings like the Kenner toy and putting the different wing package on for a different mission profile. That would obviously make a weak point where they attach, but the trade-off would be greater flexibility for a base cockpit module.

--Jonah

I'm not so sure that it would be practical to do that as a package sort of thing but from an actual production standpoint it would make a lot of sense. By making a standard cockpit module that maybe gets fitted with different engines and "wings" would really help to streamline TIE production, sort of like how the Germans would take a given tank chassis and use it to make not just tanks but tank destroyers, armored recovery vehicles, specialized assault guns, self propelled artillery, etc. In the case of TIE fighters, one factory or production line in a factory makes the base cockpit module, it then either is shipped out to another factory or just a different line to be finished as either a standard TIE, a TIE interceptor, or any of the other TIE variants that uses the same base cockpit module.
 
It actually makes good sense to have the tie wings so easily detachable considering how much damage these things take. Not to mention the different wing options

Sent from my SM-N910W8 using Tapatalk
 
From a maintenance standpoint it makes sense to if you need to remove wings for repair or repalcement.

It would seem that the TIE's systems may shut down upon wing separation for reasons of safety/survival.

or

The systems shutdown was another part of the Price's sabotage.

I say that because everything tended to go dead when the wings separated.
 
guys this is a little off topic it i was thinking today. canon wise, did plaguies know about maul being sidous's apprentice?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top