That's because he's a troll. His posts lack any sort of intelligent information. He is simply here to disturb the thread.
If I'm not mistaken, Trolls are not tolerated here on the RPF. If you believe I'm a troll, report my posts to a site administrator. They're pretty good at spotting trolls and any other forms of misconduct. So until I receive such a warning, I think it would be a good idea to not resort to baseless name calling.
First of all, if the clip would have been made any differently, he would have made a comment such as, "This is nothing like Star Wars."
Is this a straw man's argument? Because if you see my posts in the marvel threads you'll note that I made points regarding how not only were all the Marvel movies this year were different from each other. Heck, Captain America: The Winter Soldier is my favorite Marvel film of the year and saying it wasn't like the first Captain America was by no means a criticism.
And why should a comment like "This is nothing like Star Wars" automatically be regarded as a negative comment? Cripes, I'll go so far as to state that The Empire Strikes Back is nothing like Star Wars. Should that mean that one or the other sucks? No.
I never called Lucas lazy. I was calling this clip from Rebels lazy.
At least when Lucas was homaging things for the original Star Wars movie, he was at least making an effort of trying to put his own spin on it to try and give it it's own identity. This clip is just doing the same thing we saw in the same franchise all over again. It's not clever, it's just lazy.
Do you really think by "same thing" that I was talking about the intent of the scene instead of, as I said, "thing we
saw"?
Third, while you can say this is an homage I also would add; why would a small group of TIEs attacking an armed freighter not look similar. Would TIE pilots not have been trained in strategic ways to attack such a craft. Wouldn't the maneuvers, attack patterns be similar?
Do we see those maneuvers and same exact shots in the subsequent films like Empire and Jedi? No. The falcon being chased by tie fighters in Star Wars is a heck of a lot more different in both follow up films. In Star Wars, the Falcon is pretty much flying slow and in a straight line while the tie fighters fly circles around it. In Empire, the Falcon is doing spins, dives and other maneuvers while being fast enough to stay ahead of the pursuing tie fighters. In Jedi, the Falcon is literally in the center of a massive space dog fighting. Which brings us to...
Fourth, there is nothing lazy about artist taking time to replicate such details in order to ensure the proper feel.
The style in replicating the shots felt more like pandering than an honest attempt to capture the feeling. We already know that this is Star Wars and Star Wars in and of itself is a pretty cool thing. It doesn't need to pander to the first movie to remind us of that. The other Star Wars films didn't need to copy itself in order to ensure a 'proper feel'. Well, I think the plot to "Return of the Jedi" WAS a lazy retread of the first Star Wars movie and no one made a big deal about it because it was the movie that gave us the Ewoks.