Looks more like Kyle Rainer...Guy Gardner was a redhead, had a bowl-cut and was a complete jerk.
This failed pilot movie used elements from both characters.
Looks more like Kyle Rainer...Guy Gardner was a redhead, had a bowl-cut and was a complete jerk.
Looks more like Kyle Rainer...Guy Gardner was a redhead, had a bowl-cut and was a complete jerk.
Getting back on topic: I wonder if/ when they plan on killing off Shaw?
Right? That's why I'm thinking they'll do it soon.That would be a big mistake as Shaw's easily one of the most likeable aspects of the show.
Right? That's why I'm thinking they'll do it soon.
Someone who is the 3rd most frequent poster in this thread certainly cares a great deal.As an outsider who simply no longer cares
On that note:
By all rights, they shouldn't have any of the Enterprise-D in a musem. The Saucer would have been irretrievably damaged by the landing, per the TNG Tech Manual:
Sternbach, Rick, and Michael Okuda. Star Trek: The Next Generation Technical Manual, page 29. Pocket Books, November 1 1991. ( ISBN 0-671-70427-3)
Just look at what happened to the bridge when the ship came to a full stop on Veridian III.
While that's true, it seems the writers of the ZTNG manual are speaking insofar as trying to repair the ship via what we would consider conventional" means (i.e. shipyard and welding/ replacing damaged parts, etc.). But yeah, I do agree at some point it would become a Ship of Theseus issue.Given the in-universe tech, NOTHING should be irretrievably damaged in the ST Universe. Since transporters can disassemble atoms and beam the subatomic particles long distances, only to reassemble them IN PERFECT ORDER DOWN TO THE INHERENT QUARK SPIN (based on the original item's pattern), then one COULD reassemble whatever remains of ANY object, "straighten it out" in the transporter buffer piece by piece, and replicate missing matter... with matter replicators.
But it may quickly become a Ship Of Theseus type scenario.
Why is it that with the limitless possibilities of holodeck technology that the crews just keep recreating bars?
I watched one of these and am on the fence about watching more. On one hand it's delightful insight. On the other, it's infuriating, because Dominic DOES NOT LET THE GUEST TALK. They can never finish a story or a thought, or sometimes even a sentence. Dom will ask a question then interrupt the answer. Maddening.This was a pleasant conversation between Trek alumni. Gates also shared the thought process behind the show and I thought it was fascinating. Loved Dominic's reaction when he realized that Terry Matalas was THAT Terry (i.e. Brannon Braga's assistant): "I knew I should have been nicer to him!" lol
I watched one of these and am on the fence about watching more. On one hand it's delightful insight. On the other, it's infuriating, because Dominic DOES NOT LET THE GUEST TALK. They can never finish a story or a thought, or sometimes even a sentence. Dom will ask a question then interrupt the answer. Maddening.
This pic reminds of something I thought years ago. How bad was the posture of anyone sitting in those forward chairs. I mean Data could just reset his android spine and muscles, but any human crew, would be in sickbay after every shift, lol.I
Hmmmmm…
Well, I guess they could have set up some chairs and panels in a brightly-lit Hilton Lobby?
View attachment 1681110
I don't know about the chairs, but I read that several cast members experienced back problems from the original one-piece uniforms because the combination of the tight fit and the stirrups made the costumes pull downward from their shoulders, putting stress on their backs when they stood.This pic reminds of something I thought years ago. How bad was the posture of anyone sitting in those forward chairs. I mean Data could just reset his android spine and muscles, but any human crew, would be in sickbay after every shift, lol.