Macrossmaster
Well-Known Member
So I watched the two hour pilot of Airwolf on a sick day. It's frankly, terrible. The best part was the helicopter, and I can imagine watching it in the 80's hoping they'd show fewer actors and more copter.
It really brought home the difference between TV and movies in the 80's - movies were freaking AMAZING. You got CGI in Tron, amazing adventure in Indiana Jones and incredible adventure in space with Star Wars movies. The acting was better, special effects were incredible in movies, and almost non-existant in TV.
Even watching Airwolf, where it was clear they spent a TON of money, it was very simple - same reused shots of missiles, lots of footage in the desert, pacing slow as a turtle. Apparently in the 80's you soaked up a ton of time to offset the massive cost investment.
If you watched Airwolf and then Top Gun (made two years later), you really couldn't help but notice the difference in quality.
Does it seem to anyone else like movies seem cheaper, and TV seems better? You've got almost cinematic quality TV, and movies that seem like they're cheaping out with bad CGI.
It really brought home the difference between TV and movies in the 80's - movies were freaking AMAZING. You got CGI in Tron, amazing adventure in Indiana Jones and incredible adventure in space with Star Wars movies. The acting was better, special effects were incredible in movies, and almost non-existant in TV.
Even watching Airwolf, where it was clear they spent a TON of money, it was very simple - same reused shots of missiles, lots of footage in the desert, pacing slow as a turtle. Apparently in the 80's you soaked up a ton of time to offset the massive cost investment.
If you watched Airwolf and then Top Gun (made two years later), you really couldn't help but notice the difference in quality.
Does it seem to anyone else like movies seem cheaper, and TV seems better? You've got almost cinematic quality TV, and movies that seem like they're cheaping out with bad CGI.