CSMacLaren
Sr Member
I apologize if this is considered off-topic. Someone I know just lost his young daugther to cancer. I wanted to create a portrait of her and give it to the little girl's parents.
I have a remarkable photo printer and have a small graphic which I enlarged and used Photoshop to make into something that looks like it might have been a cross between watercolors and acrylic.
My goal was print this out on the Canon inkjet on photopaper, then use some kind of clear acrylic to apply some to the photo with a brush to create a brush-like texture so that it looks a little more like a real painting.
I am not a gifted portrait painter by any means, so this is the best I can do artistically for the family.
My concern is that the clear acrylic might interact with the printout's inkjet ink and begin to smear.
However, I know that in certain mass produced commercial paintings, they use a similar technique to add texture to printed reproductions.
Any advice would be most deeply appreciated. Thank you all for your indulgence.
I have a remarkable photo printer and have a small graphic which I enlarged and used Photoshop to make into something that looks like it might have been a cross between watercolors and acrylic.
My goal was print this out on the Canon inkjet on photopaper, then use some kind of clear acrylic to apply some to the photo with a brush to create a brush-like texture so that it looks a little more like a real painting.
I am not a gifted portrait painter by any means, so this is the best I can do artistically for the family.
My concern is that the clear acrylic might interact with the printout's inkjet ink and begin to smear.
However, I know that in certain mass produced commercial paintings, they use a similar technique to add texture to printed reproductions.
Any advice would be most deeply appreciated. Thank you all for your indulgence.