Zombie_61
Master Member
According to an online article I read some years ago (while the final episodes were still being remastered, I think) CBS reponded to the initial criticisms by providing better computer equipment for the effects team to work with. It was much faster and had a lot more memory, which allowed the effects team to add considerably more detail than they had previously.One other element that I think CBS deserves a bit of credit for is their reaction to criticism. When "Balance of Terror" first debuted, it was met with lukewarm reception...Thankfully CBS listened to the criticisms and not only created a brand new Enterprise model...
As I understand it, the "unnecessary" movement is often thought to be necessary for CG characters in order to make them look less computer generated; i.e., if they're standing perfectly still they look less realistic. That same thought process is the reason the actors portraying apes in the original Planet of the Apes movies were always moving their faces even if they had no lines--it was believed the makeups would look too mask-like if they hadn't....Another problem is what I call "showing off", the need for some CGI artists to make their work stand out...I see this in some CGI characters too, moving around in an awkward fashion. In TPM, when they were going over the battle plan, the human characters are just standing and looking at the hologram of the palace. But Boss Nass is rocking around like he has Parkinson's or something...