NEW (OLD) MILLENNIUM FALCON from SOLO the movie

Tried a little conversion from above:

Unbenannt.gif
 
I remember there was a discussion about the jaws of the full scale set for TLJ which have been noticed to be too high. As far as I remember, it was agreed that this was a preparation for Solo to reuse the set. So it means that they don't open/close to attach to the cargo module, which aould have been a great solution.

But I do like the new design very much!

(But as I like most of the Prequel designs, too, I feel that I am disqualified for having any opinion, right? I hoped the prequel haters would become silent after TFA and TLJ...)
 
thorst said:
But I do like the new design very much!

(But as I like most of the Prequel designs, too, I feel that I am disqualified for having any opinion, right? I hoped the prequel haters would become silent after TFA and TLJ...)
Click to expand...

Don't be a drama queen. Your opinion is just fine.



Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
 
Just wondering ( apologies if already discussed ) . IIRC from background info I’d read awhile back - the rectenna on the OT Falcon was illegally added by Han as part of his ‘ modifications ‘ . Where as the rectangular one in TFA was standard issue .
The article from EW states Lando primarily uses it for transporting cargo and pleasure purposes . Why would he need a Military grade rectenna on a legal ship - or am I wrong about the round rectenna ?
 
Last edited:
gedmac66 said:
Just wondering ( apologies if already discussed ) . IIRC from background info I’d read awhile back - the rectenna on the OT Falcon was illegally added by Han as part of his ‘ modifications ‘ . Where as the rectangular one in TFA was standard issue .
The article from EW states Lando primarily uses it for transporting cargo and pleasure purposes . Why would he need a Military grade rectenna on a legal ship - or am I wrong about the round rectenna ?
Click to expand...

I wouldn't think about it too hard. This may be old canon and the film will establish the new canon -- until some future film where the director wants to contradict it, in which case the new canon will become 'legends' canon and there will be a new new canon.
 
Hunk a Junk said:
I wouldn't think about it too hard. This may be old canon and the film will establish the new canon -- until some future film where the director wants to contradict it, in which case the new canon will become 'legends' canon and there will be a new new canon.
Click to expand...

No wonder my brain hurts , and my memories are turning into kaka !:wacko
 
scifiwolf said:
I don't care what is in books, guides, games, shows, or was said by Lucas or Hidalgo or anyone. If it ain't in a movie, it ain't canon (easter eggs don't count, either). That's just the way I look at it.
Click to expand...
So isn't an easter egg in the movie? Which by your definition makes it canon?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
U.S.S. Endeavor, NCC-1716
2
Replies
27
Views
2,122
Gregatron
G
JediMichael
Three X-Wings and a Tie Fighter....blowing one up.
2 3
Replies
53
Views
4,658
JediMichael
JediMichael
IronRanger88
Dumb and Dumber Mini Bike
Replies
3
Views
1,034
KSKS
KSKS
mung
Film Can Spaceship
2 3
Replies
51
Views
6,405
kermet
kermet
JSchneider
ILM Painted - Gifted Millennium Falcon - on Display at Oshkosh EAA Museum
2 3
Replies
57
Views
9,813
DaddyfromNaboo
DaddyfromNaboo
Back
Top