Seconded. The 50th cannot go by with some kind of awesome something. I vote for a 'Living Docs' special....and if Chris won't play, CG his ass in there ANYWAY! :love
I really don't get why everyone keeps complaining about the episodes being bad. I think it keeps getting better and better all the time.
Ok, rant-majeure rapproaching :lol
Warning, lack of paragraphs ahead.
My personal response to this question, you asked for it :love
I think they are bad because of the poor, muddled stories, the increasingly irrational, hyperactive, 'comedy turn' performance of Matt Smith, Moffat's obsession with over-complex mysteries, when he can't even control the tone of a 13 episode season, the companions who don't give a damn about losing their child, the plotholes, the explanation of each story at the conclusion by the Doctor as being some hospital/prison/alien child that doesen't understand it's function, the gigantic leaps of logic, the over-amped and unearned sentimentality, the weird 'shrinking' universe', the over-use of peripheral characters over developing empathy with the Doctor, the Doctor basically being an utter ******, the amount of episodes concluding that everything can be resolved with a father's love (seriously Steve, Mother issues, much?), the flat production values, the fact that RTD's seasons had one or two bad epis each to Moffat's one or two good ones, the lack of any sense of adventure, deserted in favour 'witty' dialogue, Amy Pond, conclusions that leave you going, at best, 'Huh?' at worst 'Is that it?.', that pug ugly sonic being everywhere, all the time, the crashing music mix overwhelming Matt Smith's weirdly mumbled, rambling expositions, it ain't scary, Moffat's love of throwing in irrelevant or inexplainable crap just because it 'looks cool', and finally, and most importantly, where are the stories? The show has become a series of mysteries, stitched togrether with sketched out filler and set pieces that usually amount to nothing but further obsfucation.
And
FEZZES ARE NOT COOL!
That is one loooong sentence. lol
I don't see the show that way myself but no-one will change anyone elses views as our ideas of what we like will all be unique. And I've watched Doctor Who since I was a little kid probably just as you have.
I agree with you there, he was hard to watch. Tom baker was my fave until Tennant and now Smith is. I also liked McGann and wish they had developed his live action character further although it needed to move the setting back to England. I'm American but think some stuff should stay where it originates. Doctor Who doesn't need to be Americanized IMHO.
I agree with you also. McGann was good. He doesn't get enough credit since he was only in that movie. I wasn't a fan of the movie, but I like him. It would've definitely been better in an English setting rather than American. I'm American too and I think it should stay British. I watch Doctor Who 1) because its good and 2) because its British. If I wanted to watch Americanized stuff, I would watch everything else on tv here.I agree with you there, he was hard to watch. Tom baker was my fave until Tennant and now Smith is. I also liked McGann and wish they had developed his live action character further although it needed to move the setting back to England. I'm American but think some stuff should stay where it originates. Doctor Who doesn't need to be Americanized IMHO.
I agree with you there, he was hard to watch. Tom baker was my fave until Tennant and now Smith is. I also liked McGann and wish they had developed his live action character further although it needed to move the setting back to England. I'm American but think some stuff should stay where it originates. Doctor Who doesn't need to be Americanized IMHO.
The only thing that irritates me is that they make Amy seem more important than the Doctor when she isn't. Companions are supposed to be part of the story, not have the whole story revolve around them.