Millennium Falcon parts for 3d Printing

I think you can still get a Fusion360 license for free if you say personal use.

It's cloud based so can be a bit quirky, but quite easy to learn and there are a load of videos on youtube
 
Hey Joshua,
I know you posted the comment way back in February, (I've been away) but who was selling your parts on Shapeways?
I ask because I want to avoid giving them any business, un-intentionally. Though, I have thus far only printed out my own Studio Scale related parts.
Did Shapeways support you at all in taking the parts down?
You can copyright your 3D meshes... even if you choose to share them, and you can go after any perpetrators including suing for "unjustified enrichment"
 
Last edited:
Not to be out of turn, but it is literally impossible at the moment to have real control over digital files, which generally are STL's. All they are is a series of XYZ vectors for triangles, you can read them like text in the ASCII version.
There is no provision for any other data or watermarking. You can add your name or whatever as 3D text cut into the model in a place that doesn't matter, but that's dead easy to cut out.
There is work going on for a more advanced 3D file format that hopefully will have some sort of protection, too many people get stuff stolen or misused.
 
Last edited:
The rear part of the main body is the back of the Y-wing right?

From the pics that I have seen it kind of looks similar, but different. However I haven't spent much time researching the Y-wing so I could be wrong. Best check the Y-wing treads.

Love your work on the Firefox BTW!
 
Some recent progress on the Centurion.

Centurion Parts 01.jpg
Centurion Parts 02.jpg
 
Last edited:
Nice, i was just putting this assembly together on my Bandai. So curious how they cut it up to interface with the rear end. It breaks up into three pieces right? Did they just eyeball it?
 
Nice, i was just putting this assembly together on my Bandai. So curious how they cut it up to interface with the rear end. It breaks up into three pieces right? Did they just eyeball it?

Hi Steve,
It certainly appears that way but I'm not 100% sure just yet. Others here who are further along with their builds would know for sure ;)

It seems there are at leat 3x of the top rear louvred engine covers pictured above with the hull that are used, so it could also be the same number of hulls that get sectioned to fit properly.
I've counted 7x of another smaller detailed part used on the walkways, pits and sides of mandibles for which there is only one per kit.

Truth be told I haven't assembled any of the parts yet, except for the Panther bit at the rear end on the underside Jaw box. And by assembled I mean virtually in Rhino.

I cant wait to get my hands on a Bandai for reference! Very envious!
 
Here's the other thread for the X-Wing stuff...

 
Fantastic work!
I had to laugh when I saw your scanning of the Monogram transaxle.
I ran into the same problems recently with the Valkyrie engine cans. I had started to model the part when I realised that the hoses and other features on the radial surface would be difficult to measure, and best captured by scanning.

Screen Shot 2020-08-03 at 6.01.37 pm.png


I have a rudimentary David Scanner setup and figured it might get something usable. The part is so small though, and thus far I have found it too difficult to date to get a good result.

Screen Shot 2020-06-11 at 1.25.03 pm.png
(Above) Multiple scans aligned in David Scan.

Screen Shot 2020-06-11 at 1.23.37 pm.png
(Above) Scans merged to a mesh result.

Its almost there for my requirements but not quite. Hence I have put it aside for the moment, and have gone back to the Centurion with traditional verniers and paper print validation as per your excellent blog.
 
Last edited:
After recently re-reading the Falcon ID thread for the umpteenth time, I realised that I had overlooked the nosegear on the 1/32 Phantom. I modelled this last week along with a small hatch from the Tamiya 8rad. The hatch is not from the falcon but from what I can tell, it is an ANH donor.

Screen Shot 2020-08-03 at 8.15.55 pm.png
 
Fantastic work!
I had to laugh when I saw your scanning of the Monogram transaxle.
I ran into the same problems recently with the Valkyrie engine cans. I had started to model the part when I realised that the hoses and other features on the radial surface would be difficult to measure, and best captured by scanning.

View attachment 1332545

I have a rudimentary David Scanner setup and figured it might get something usable. The part is so small though, and thus far I have found it too difficult to date to get a good result.

View attachment 1332546
(Above) Multiple scans aligned in David Scan.

View attachment 1332547
(Above) Scans merged to an mesh result.

Its almost there for my requirements but not quite. Hence I have put it aside for the moment, and have gone back to the Centurion with traditional verniers and paper print validation as per your excellent blog.

I guess I'm glad (?) that your David scanner yields similar results! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I'd love to find a desktop scanning solution that works for tiny parts (that I can afford).

My experience with scanners is that they give you enough guidance that your vernier measurements make more sense. Like reading tea leaves or some other witchcraft. You divine the forms using the scan data and your own artistry!

Can't wait to see the parts!
 
My experience with scanners is that they give you enough guidance that your vernier measurements make more sense. Like reading tea leaves or some other witchcraft. You divine the forms using the scan data and your own artistry!

The thing that bugs me is that I bought a digital caliper to obtain hyper precise measurements and I never get the same measurement twice!
 
Yup. You can drive yourself batty with Standard Deviation tables keeping track of variances that might be in the part, or might just be because you held the calipers at a slightly different angle which introduced a hypotenuse value you didn’t have before - or maybe it was just more humid today!
 
Back
Top