From my local paper today:
http://www.journalgazette.net/article/20100425/FEAT0108/304259977/1007/ENT
Ha! The movie itself states that there are no superheroes because in "real life" they would get their ass kicked. I'm only going with the confines of what the movie puts on itself. This is the set-up, basis for what the characters or character has to deal with. I'm a real guy, in the real world and I'm going to be a superhero. This is all tossed out the window with the introduction of Hit Girl...
The minute he enters "that world" reality itself and the laws that apply are tossed out the window. It's a far distance to travel from walking up to some thugs and getting stabbed all the way to Hit Girl taking out a room full of people. That is the problem i have. They give examples of how the world works - much like ours then take it all away in the second act.
I'm not seeing that at all. In the case of Kick Ass, it's what happens to someone who's well intentioned but poorly trained. Hit Girl, on the other hand, has been honed into a skilled killing machine by years of training by her revenge obsessed father. I don't see a contradiction.
How do they get the audience to suspend their disbelief? I would have a really, really hard time buying it.
I haven't watched the movie and I don't plan on it, but how do they successfully portray an 11 year old girl as a skilled killing machine successfully? How do they get the audience to suspend their disbelief? I would have a really, really hard time buying it.
Something to consider... When I was a kid and took karate, my parents sent me to karate camp one summer. There I met an eight year old kid who was a double black belt. That he was waist high to the average man didn't change the fact that he COULD KILL you.
Guess you haven't taken a crushing blow to the crown jewels... that alone would make you want to die quickly. :lolMy money is on the average guy.:lol
Guess you haven't taken a crushing blow to the crown jewels... that alone would make you want to die quickly. :lol
The fact that the guy brings up Sam Raimi and Peter Jackson is just a testament that he doesn't get it. For one, I think the humor in Sam Raimi's earlier work is very infantile and spaced out slapstick rather than actually funny - it's a cartoon caricature of reality. Something that's supposed to be horrifying is just made into a farce and a joke.From my local paper today:
http://www.journalgazette.net/article/20100425/FEAT0108/304259977/1007/ENT
They don't. There is nothing possible about the things she did - no one fights that way in reality - especially an 11 yr old girl. if you believe the things she did are possible in real life - well there's no sense in discussing this with you just pass what you're smoking to the left.:lol
It's a movie. I wouldn't care if she sprouted wings and flew as long as it was entertaining. :lol
For the record, the jet pack did bother me a bit, but not for the reasons I suspect others disliked it. I'm pretty sure, while jetpacks do exist in some form, there isn't one that has a run time of over two minutes. I kept expecting they would have to make an emergency landing on a rooftop at some point.