Iron Man 3

the suit that youre referring to as the hulkbuster suit looks more like the standard ultimate iron man suit to me tbh
im_ultimate_ps3.jpg
 
Shane Black said:
Robert's portrayal of Tony is ultimately the American cowboy who defies authority, thinks for himself and is fiercely individualistic.

So he doesn't have a heart in Iron Man 3?
 
Saw the new poster, looks sick, love the shots of the new suits in the background. In addition to the space suit you can also see the heartbreaker suit to the lower left. The marketing for IM3 is certainly working - I'm getting more and more excited with all these slow reveals and can't wait to see what these new suits can do!

Btw, I get the feeling that the supposed Hulkbuster suit smashing through the wall as described in the upcoming trailer leak is actually the heartbreaker suit... don't think we'll see a heavy duty IM suit in this movie, unless that ugly Hulkbuster concept also made it to the screen, in which case it's probably not the actual Hulkbuster but just a heavy duty suit. It certainly didn't make the cut on the last poster release.
 

Uhhh.. why? That hunched over look is lame. First, the pilot would never contort himself like that for an extended time, second, it puts out a head as an easy target assuming the head is there and it's not a 'faux head' and gives it a much bigger profile than is necessary. If this is supposed to be a Hulkbuster armor, I think this makes more sense:

hulkbuster.jpeg
 
I'm not a fan of the hunched-over look either, but my assumption is that this is an Iron Monger-sized suit, where Stark would be seated inside the torso.
 
Okay, so these designs are getting worse and worse. It's like they decided to use a bunch of rejected designs just to save time and money on new designs that wouldn't be eyesores. Yeesh.
 
Re: Re: Iron Man 3

Uhhh.. why? That hunched over look is lame. First, the pilot would never contort himself like that for an extended time, second, it puts out a head as an easy target assuming the head is there and it's not a 'faux head' and gives it a much bigger profile than is necessary. If this is supposed to be a Hulkbuster armor, I think this makes more sense:

I donk think that the armor is physically built hunched over like that, I would say it is just a picture of the armor bent at the waist like a power running stance...... Look at the shoulders, it appears to be a running shot.... Not a standing...

Sent from my HTC One X
 
Uhhh.. why? That hunched over look is lame. First, the pilot would never contort himself like that for an extended time, second, it puts out a head as an easy target assuming the head is there and it's not a 'faux head' and gives it a much bigger profile than is necessary. If this is supposed to be a Hulkbuster armor, I think this makes more sense:

hulkbuster.jpeg
i would loooove to see this hulkbuster
 
He would have a cover over the tiny helmet, if it is going to be Hulk Buster. I'm sure he does not want the Hulk to rip that off.
 
Uhhh.. why? That hunched over look is lame. First, the pilot would never contort himself like that for an extended time, second, it puts out a head as an easy target assuming the head is there and it's not a 'faux head' and gives it a much bigger profile than is necessary.

All indication thus far says that's not exactly the Hulkbuster but a concept for a heavy duty suit that will more than likely be remote-piloted, instead of Stark being actually inside it. I agree the design looks terrible, I hope the HD armor in the film looks better than that, and hopefully serves as a prototype for the MCU Hulkbuster suit? One can dream.
 
Back
Top