We never saw anyone move a bolt, ever.
We never saw a folding stock on the E-11, ever.
Those were the reasons the replicas weren't made to do so, as I was consulting w/ them.
It kept costs down, which is what everyone wants.
Only the rear tabs fo the bolt were made, screwed in place.
The extractor area was just a 5 sided part screwed into place.
The safety was made in either the safe or fire position, depending upon how it was seen in the film.
Making it move costs money, and I don't need to pay for something that's not needed/ accurate to the prop itself.
K.I.S.S.
I'm open to having movable parts. It just provides a better sense of realism. I don't think having a moving safety is too much machine work compared to milling a static one, but I could be wrong.
If I found out this project was on the way earlier, I wouldn't have spent countless hours looking for a reasonably priced MGC. Having functionality to me is just more beautiful, and although this may be a reach, maybe even gun collectors would be buying it just because it may be one the best replicas on the market.
Not trying to be offensive or aggressive in my statement.
Mgoob, while I see where you're going, using the "We didn't see it, we dont need it" can also be a little bit arrogant as we could say we can use a Denix since we never saw the mauser closeup on the film to criticise it. But we know it's functional when we disregard the film, I think to some of us, that's the most important issue.
*Unrelated note to reply* This is a little contradictory aswell
I may have missed the earlier posts, please forgive me if I'm questioning something that was already answered.
As an Internation person, Is there obvious designs made to ensure it looks like a replica and can't be used as a real firearm? Such as part of the barrel is solid and a firing pin that looks the part, but cannot be removed nor function?