<div class='quotetop'>(Rogue Studios @ Jun 18 2006, 10:49 PM) [snapback]1263854[/snapback]</div>
Isn't cgi getting as expensvie or even more expensive than model work? I miss models in films. To me Models created that wonderment of how did they do that to no more wonderment from cgi. Now cgi actually takes away a film for me because it's just too simple and phoney looking too.
Lee
[/b]
No, unfortunately, it's cheaper to do and once they are built (the models, digitally) they can be used again and again, blown up, re-scaled, modified, for still less than rebuilding a model or making replicas to blow up.
It's very sad, though the CGI stuff does keep getting better.
Very telling that the best CGI is still the instances where they build a model then scan it and use pictures of it for texture maps.
Since Lucas has a huge fleet of CG ships, I doubt he will ever build models again for a Star Wars project. And I hope I am wrong.
Most of the folks here have a very good eye for detail and you must admit, are generally looking very hard to spot the CG stuff. Today's average viewer doesn't see it and is being more and more conditioned to the CG as being "what they should look like."
The other downside to this is that as the nodel shops go away, they take many talented prop builders as well. I can't think of any model builders that don't also make props (or did, when they were still in business.)