GINO/DARK SHADOW RECASTING ISSUE OUTCOME

[synasp]

<div class='quotetop'>(amish @ Aug 14 2006, 08:48 PM) [snapback]1300585[/snapback]</div>

what is a PIP?[/b]

mod slang for "warning."

synomymous with point, notch, level, step, etc.

 

[vaderdarth]

Actually, I was the one crying Gino did the nasty........and I immediately sent every shred of evidence I had to the moderators. I got other people in the know to do the same. The moderators reviewed the matter for about a month and sent me a PM explaining that because the "item" was from a screen piece............it fell outside of RPF jurisdiction. Yes it stung, but I accepted it and moved on. I do, however, keep getting dragged back into Gino's insanity for some reason or other.


If anyone should be upset with a moderator over Gino and his antics......it would be me. But what is the point??? The rules were upheld firmly and fairly and life goes on.....at least for some. The MODs had no choice but to act as they did under our guidelines. I can't hold that against them.

Here ya go Gino: I apologize for calling you a dirty good for nothing lowdown yellow bellied recaster. I have been proven wrong under our current guidelines about your "role as a recastinator". I am sorry for using the word recaster. I'm not saying you are a good person, so please don't misread that. But you are not a recaster since my item was sourced from a screen used item.

I can tell you one thing...........once the MODs ruled on the Vaderdarth versus Gino recsting issue.......you didn't see me start multiple threads publicly accusing fellow members of recasting... In fact, you won't hear me utter the word "Gino" unless you drag it out of me or I see "those we don't speak of" drag my own good name back into his little game of utter madness.

The bottom line is that Dark Shadow and yes, Ghost Host were falsely accused and both deserve an apology from their wretched accuser.


I'm not gonna add anything further to this conversation.......but if you want to chide me into commenting, do so by PM and I'll be happy to address you personally. I'll be happy to tell you anything you need to know. Same for you Gino, wanna act like a man, address me personally or just don't use my name ever again. I don't like how you mishandle it anyway.

Dave

 

[GINO]

I tried to say this in my initial post, but it was kind of a short novel so just in case it was lost in the shuffle, let me re-state it in a more digestable form.

I apologize to Dark Shadow for calling him out for recasting my items without having photographic smoking gun evidence and for making my accusation based on the circumstantial evidence as per already discussed.


I tried my best to chronicle the events as they happend solely for the purpose of showing my thought process as the events played out.

 

[exoray]

<div class='quotetop'>(bbabich @ Aug 14 2006, 08:03 PM) [snapback]1300566[/snapback]</div>

It is up to the one he accused as to whether or not Gino's statement is sufficient.

If the apology is not acceptable, then Gino will receive a pip, if the apology is acceptable, then the issue is resolved.[/b]

You are kidding right??? Individual members (mind you the ones who have a grudge) get to decide who gets punished/banned and who doesn't now?

 

[TK-2067]

<div class='quotetop'>(exoray @ Aug 15 2006, 02:16 AM) [snapback]1300603[/snapback]</div>

<div class='quotetop'>(bbabich @ Aug 14 2006, 08:03 PM) [snapback]1300566[/snapback]

It is up to the one he accused as to whether or not Gino's statement is sufficient.

If the apology is not acceptable, then Gino will receive a pip, if the apology is acceptable, then the issue is resolved.[/b]

You are kidding right??? Individual members (mind you the ones who have a grudge) get to decide who gets punished/banned and who doesn't now?
[/b][/quote]
seems like a bit of power trip goin here ... give someone and inch and they take a mile.

 

[Walter]

No that is not simply the case, but now that Gino has summarized his apology to Dark Shadow, I consider this issue resolved and closed.