GINO/DARK SHADOW RECASTING ISSUE OUTCOME

Status
Not open for further replies.

GINO

Sr Member
I have been repeatedly contacted by the RPF admin (synasp) for two instances that I called people out for recasting. GH and Dark Shadow.
Recently, I've been given the ultimatum to either prove beyond a shadow of a doubt proof of this or be banned from the RPF.
In the GH recasting fiasco, I did everything in my power to produce the "proof" necessary to validate my claims which ended in a Jeff's word vs. GH word. According to the admin, this was undecidable and left hanging.
In the Dark Shadow instance, I felt that we both had our say and as long as more of the buttons didn't show up, nothing more need come of it.
Synasp would not let the issue die and continued to send me threatening PM including a 2 day suspension from posting and the re-signing of the TOS of the RPF. When it was clear that this issue was not going to die, I repeatedly requested to speak with an admin over the phone as to how to best handle this and was denied. This made me feel as if the decision to ban me had already been made. I had been given a deadline of Monday 14th to provide evidence, apologize, or be banned.
Everyone knows that the arguments between myself and Sithlord are legend. Everyone knows that there is no love between us, and has seen cronyism run rampant in threads from his friends. During this whole conflict, it has come to my attention that Synasp and Sithlord are good friends. Such good friends that Synasp made Sithlord a moderator over at the propcircle forum. When I found this out, all the hassling that I've gotten over time from Synasp over any issue especially GH, started to make sense. I feared that I was unfairly being targeted and being set up for a banning guised as someone not wanting to follow the TOS of the RPF.
I requested to have another mod step in to handle the situation. I then received a PM from Bbabich that he was taking over this situation. I had never spoken to Bbabich nor do I have any knowledge of the nature of the relationship between Bbabich and Synasp. I do know that I received a huge stiff-arm from Babich when asked to communicate with him via phone. Not as an alternative to providing written documentation, but as a prelude. It felt to me very much like this had already been decided and this whole thing was just a dog and pony show.

So here's my response. It's long and not for the short attention spanned. But hopefully it provides insight into what went down and why and helps brings some understanding to what some consider poor form on my part.

Also, I've been trying to be more aware of the tone of my posts, so please note that when I type things in all caps, it's not because I'm yelling those words, it's because I am trying to emphasize or highlight them and don't know how to change text color.


A couple of weeks ago, I noticed a thread in the junkyard by Dark Shadow which was offering a vader chestbox with my greeblies on it.
When I saw it, I immediately pm'd Dark Shadow asking him what the deal was. At that time, I didn't know if he purchased the greeblies from someone else who recast them, or if he recast them himself and was now posting an "interest" thread in the JY. What I did know for sure was that they were indeed mine.

My first PM read as this:
"Scott,
Where did you get that chestbox?
Those upper black and lower gold greeblies are recast from one of my boxes. I'd like to know where they came from before I start kicking and stomping.
Please let me know asap what the deal is."


I then a few moments later sent a second PM saying this:
"Also the silver greeblies are mine as well.
WTF?"


I did not get a response, so I posted a thread in the main forum titled "Someone recast my chestbox greeblies". I copied and pasted the unedited first post that he made in the JY where the box was being offered into the new thread that I had just created.

Here was the Dark Shadow post that I copied and pasted from the JY:

HIS POST FROM THE JY:
"I have a chest box for sale. It includes aluminum rods, working lighted coin slots oscillating circuit and straps. The box has been painted with acrylic enamel automotive paint so its extremely durable.
I can include extra silver greeblies if you want an empire version box.
$375 plus shipping OBO"
(it included a pic of the box in question)


At that time, I still hadn't accused Dark Shadow of directly recasting my buttons because I did not know how he obtained them. The title of the thread I created in the main forum was still "Someone recast my chestbox greeblies".

It wasn't until I started thinking about this one very important line in his text that made me change my mind.
It was where he said "I can include extra silver greeblies if you want an empire version box."
I then immediately edited the title of the thread to read "Dark Shadow recast my chestbox greeblies"
THE REASON FOR THIS IS BECAUSE HOW ELSE COULD HE INCLUDE EXTRA GREEBLIES IF IT WASN'T HE HIMSELF OR A FRIEND WHO RECAST THEM.
This is the heart and sole of this accusation and to which I will keep referring back to later in this post.


HERE WAS MY FIRST POST:
"In the junkyard there is an esb chesbox for sale by dark shadow.
The upper black buttons, the lower gold buttons, the silver greeblies, and coinslots are all recasts of my pieces. They were all scratch built by me, I'd know them anywhere and I still have the masters.

This is EXACTLY why I don't share my stuff, or make the really cool stuff available.
Here is the box and his comments. The part where he states that he can make extra silver greeblies available is pretty damning to me. "
(and I posted a pic of the box)


IMPORTANT NOTE:
I have two versions of chestboxes. Ones that are cast off original (which I don't and never have made available), and ones that I scratch built (which I do make available).
People have asked, why would Dark Shadow try to sell something publicly that is easily identifiable as a GINO part. Surely he wouldn't be that foolish. And I agree.
The reason is this:
UNTIL I POSTED MY RESPONSE, DARK SHADOW DID NOT KNOW THAT THE GREEBLIES ON MY CHESTBOXES WERE SCRATCH BUILT.
When someone thinks something is cast off original, they don't think that anyone would be able to tell exactly what the source was. Also, a lot of people believe that it is open season on recasting original or found parts anyway.
I believe that once he came to this realization that they were my scratchbuilds, he began to backpedal.
Here is the PM that I received by him in response:

"Youre absolutely correct, they are yours. Heres the deal. I bought one of your chest boxes from someone (I dont remember the name) I removed the circuit board and lights,and silver greeblies and applied them to the one you see pictured (which is the one I have been using on my personal one) I kept the main box for myself and I am in the process of milling new more accurate greeblies out of aluminum myself (no offense) for my new box (made by you). If you want, I can mension that the greeblies and circuit are yours, no problem there.
Id sell my new box with copies of my new greeblies but I dont have them finished and I need rather quick cash... The coin slots are yours as well as I am using Custom built aluminum ones now. Let me know if youd like for me to mension your name and I will make that addition.
-Scott"


In his JY for sale thread, he stated and I quote: "I can include extra silver greeblies if you want an empire version box."
I believe wholeheartedly that he recast my buttons and that was what he had initially planned to provide as extras. It is the only plausible conclusion that I believe you can come to. If it was his own new milled greeblies, there was no mention of it in the for sale thread. NOT TO MENTION THAT THEY DON'T EVEN EXIST AT THIS POINT. He even mentioned in his pm that he needed a quick sale for cash. I believe that he had the extra buttons ON HAND.

ANOTHER IMPORTANT NOTE:
The box being offered in the JY by Dark Shadow was a ROTJ style box. To make an ESB style box, you would need to use DUPLICATE versions of the silver greeblies found on the ROTJ. How was he going to do this exactly if he didn't have more of them. Offer a different version of extra silver buttons that don't match? I think not. NO ONE would buy a box with mis-matching buttons. HE WOULD HAVE HAD TO HAVE DUPICATES OF THEM OR HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO OFFER EXTRAS. AND THE ONLY WAY FOR HIM TO HAVE DUPLICATES WOULD BE IF HE RECAST THEM.

I believe that this was his intention. I suppose in hindsight what I should have done was have someone purchase his box with the extra greeblies. That would have given me the smoking gun evidence. But I didn't. I wish I had thought of it at the time. I did however ask him for close up photos up the greeblies on the box he was selling in the JY and was denied. I believe that these close up photos would at least help in determining whether the greeblies on his box for sale were my original buttons or recasts. I have pics of my stuff, but unless Dark Shadow is willing (or forced) to provide documentation on his end, then how could I possibly have "smoking gun" proof. He provided none nor was he forced to.

Which brings me to this...

As I have been given the ultimatum of apologize, provide smoking gun proof or be banned from the RPF I have no alternative but to apologize.

I apologize to Dark Shadow for making a post calling him a recaster of my items without smoking gun evidence in the form of a photograph.

Although I apologize for stating that claim as fact, I still maintain that belief to this very moment.
I don't think that because evidence (answers to my questions/photographs) weren't given to me from Dark Shadow, that I should be considered wrong by default. According to the admin (synasp), I fear this is how they view it. It's like demanding a chef to build you a cake, but then not giving him access to the kitchen.

Based on what I've laid out here, I would hope that people would understand why I would react the way I did, and why I believe what I do.
I feel that my presence on this forum has been one of contribution, although not always in the form of resin trinkets, or telling everyone EVERYTHING I know, but in the form of sharing what I can, trying my best to raise the bar on vader or trooper related items, or helping others with their projects. I realize that sometimes the way I come off in my posts can rub people the wrong way. For that I apologize as it's not my intention. Where there is a routine group of people, (and you know who I'm talking about) who are there to consistently dump on anything you say or post, it's going to bring out a little bit of "in your face" type of posts. If I do have a chip on my shoulder, I can tell you that this small group of people were the ones who put it there and it is for them, not everyone.

I don't think it is right to be banned for standing up for myself in the face of what I feel is a VERY plausible case of having my items recast. Whether there is photographic evidence or not, that shouldn't' be the end all be all in determining whether it has taken place or not. I suppose in the future, in a similar scenario, I would approach it by posting a thread saying something like, I have serious suspicions of being recast and here's why. I know that makes some people uncomfortable because those type of threads wouldn't always end with a definitive answer, but it is the only fair way to go especially when there is no definitive proof that the items AREN'T recast either. I don't think the RPF policy should be that the lack of smoking gun evidence on the front end of an accusation should eliminate discussion of the matter altogether. I think both sides should have their say (for as much as they feel they need to) and onlookers can make their own decisions based on that.

I can think of many times that I've baselessly been called a recaster by Vaderdarth and others of that crew. Why am I the only one being called to task on it? Especially, when in both cases that I've cried foul, I've done my best to lay it out or provide what I can to substantiate my claim.

I guess that's it. Sorry for the long read. Believe me, for as painful as it was for you to read it, it was double painful to write it.
I despise super long winded posts, but I do have a gun to my head so to speak.
 
Completely ridiculous way to handle the situation, given the PMs you've posted, on the part of the mods. Yes, I am a GINO fan, as his work is stellar, but I am no blind follower. Sorry, but I took it as he (Darkshadow) may have bought an ESB box initially and was selling the greeblies left over from converting it into a RotJ box. If he were selling multiples of those boxes, then yes, it would be a pretty clear case of recasting an item GINO crafted. If he were offering more then the extra two greeblies, also pretty clear cut case as well. Hindsight being what it is, it would have been good to let the sale go through and see what resulted from it.

To the mods, we live and die by our reputations here. GINO has been around a hell of a lot longer than I have and people's minds are made up one way or the other about him via that reputation. Not many, I would wager, have given him or anyone a chance beyond their rep. Not many take the time to know others here beyond a few "Wow, good job" posts on their crafted pieces. I like GINO. He has always seemed personable to me, even as far back as when he first put out his chest boxes. Yes, he knows his stuff, and with the attacks the above named people volley his way, can you or anyone here blame him for his reaction? I can't and would probably have reacted much the same way.

If he made a mistake, he is the one who has to live with it and frankly, I don't know what a banning would solve, other than removing one more personality from this forum. You suspended him once, so can you explain the double jeopardy thing? Yeah, he is a hard cat to know, but so are a lot of us. As far as I am concerned, he contributes quite a bit to the hobby.
 
<div class='quotetop'>(vader71 @ Aug 14 2006, 07:53 PM) [snapback]1300228[/snapback]</div>
Why is there no apology to GH?
[/b]
By the sound of it, it was left hanging... so no resolution to who is right. Or am I getting it wrong?
 
Not baselessly at all Gino. You know specifically what you sold that you had no permission to sell. I decided to leave that issue in the past and you are a complete fool for bringing it up again. I have not moved in your general direction for a very long time and here is one more time where you insist on dragging my good name back into one of your idiotic causes.

I don't wish you or anyone else ill will Gino, but I wish you would get banned permanently from this place. It was peaceful around here during the small period of time that you were away and for the sake of the entire RPF, I wish it to be peaceful again.

You keep baselessly accusing good people of misdeeds while ignoring accuasations made about yourself. Enough is enough.

You want me to back off, keep out of my hair for a change.

Dave :(
 
edit: Since I'm not involved with this case as a mod, but since Gino has seen fit to accuse me of setting him up (as if I forced him to call people recasters), I felt the need to reply the easiest way I can: liberal use of sarcasm. My apologies for it being childish, but for the sake of context, I'll leave it in tact.

As a disclaimer, as ironic as it is, possibly the most offensive accusation you can force on me is to call me unjust. It may sound stupid or silly to you, but to me Justice is everything. Regardless of how unbiased or neutral I am, my emotions and personal interests kick in when I'm accused of being unfair. It doesn't happen all the time, but in this case, it did. It's like calling Marty McFly a chicken.

So here's my reply, but keep in mind my "mod hat" is off, if I'm even allowed to do that:
------------------------------

<div class='quotetop'></div>
Recently, I've been given the ultimatum to either prove beyond a shadow of a doubt proof of this or be banned from the RPF.[/b]
False. You were given the opportunity to provide evidence or, if you didn't have any evidence at all (which is the case), to apologize for terribly handling these issues. With Ghost Host, you failed to provide any evidence at all, and opted instead to complain about the process and not seek resolution. You were given a warning. Then you asked I not be involved, so I passed your "case" on. Now you're presented with the same options anyone who calls out another member in public without evidence is given: proof or apology. Fail in this, and you get another warning.

Members who use a little tact and bring up recasting privately have entirely opposite experiences than what you're having. Maybe the difference is failure at personal accountability? Lack of tact? Disrespect? Help me out here.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
In the GH recasting fiasco, I did everything in my power to produce the "proof" necessary to validate my claims which ended in a Jeff's word vs. GH word.[/b]
Wow. Really? If everything in your power consists of complaining about having to provide evidence, then try please harder the next time you call someone a recaster. (or hey, do it in private. or apologize if you have no evidence)

<div class='quotetop'></div>
In the Dark Shadow instance, I felt that we both had our say and as long as more of the buttons didn't show up, nothing more need come of it.[/b]
Are you freggin kidding me? You called someone a recaster and had no proof. How is that both of you having your say? You libel someone and it's okay as long as he gets to deny it? The burden of proof lies at your feet. Please look down for a second and respect other member's reputations, and stop stepping on them.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
Synasp would not let the issue die and continued to send me threatening PM including a 2 day suspension from posting and the re-signing of the TOS of the RPF.[/b]
Would you like me to post my threatening PMs? :lol If those were threatening... wow. Your 2 day suspension was for calling Ghost Host a recaster when both of you have been warned to leave each other alone. For that alone you should've gotten warning, but the recasting bit was over the top. Please do not try to skew facts further.

You were given the choice to provide evidence of Dark Shadow recasting, or apologize by today. Instead of gathering your "evidence" you complained again and again after I passed on your case to another mod. And now, instead of an apology, you write this crap? Un-freggin-believable.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
When it was clear that this issue was not going to die, I repeatedly requested to speak with an admin over the phone as to how to best handle this and was denied.[/b]
We're on call? And your history of "I don't want to write PMs, lets talk on the phone" extends from your "no PMs means no future accountability" mentality.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
This made me feel as if the decision to ban me had already been made.[/b]
I'm sorry, you didn't get a choice of evidence or apology? We don't hand out bans like candy. You have to screw up over and over (and over).

You're not being banned for calling people a recaster. You got a pre-strike 1 for the @#$%. argument you and a few others got into a few months back. Everyone involved was warned. Then you got strike 1 for disregarding your pre-strike 1, when you, Ghost Host, and others were told to avoid each other. You went beyond not avoiding to publicly calling Ghost Host a recaster. Now you're about to get strike 2 for calling Dark Shadow a recaster in public with no evidence, no apology. And worse, you're not even sorry you have no evidence.. This really blows my mind.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
During this whole conflict, it has come to my attention that Synasp and Sithlord are good friends. Such good friends that Synasp made Sithlord a moderator over at the propcircle forum.[/b]
What the hell does Sithlord have to do with you publicly calling people recasters?

<div class='quotetop'></div>
When I found this out, all the hassling that I've gotten over time from Synasp over any issue especially GH, started to make sense.[/b]
Let me get this straight. There's a 3rd-removed conspiracy against you? You call Ghost Host a recaster in public after being told to leave each other alone, so Ghost Host runs to Sithlord, then Sithlord runs to me, then I run to the rest of the staff? That's a hell of a lot of running, Gino. I'm more a sit-down guy.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
I feared that I was unfairly being targeted and being set up for a banning guised as someone not wanting to follow the TOS of the RPF.[/b]
Damn, I'm really sorry... I apologize for subliminally forcing you to call people recasters in public, then implanting a lack of accountability for apology or evidence. I should stop with my super powers.

Okay, I'm out of time for now... please wait for my next fun installment of this charade to not be held accountable.
 
<div class='quotetop'></div>
I had never spoken to Bbabich nor do I have any knowledge of the nature of the relationship between Bbabich and Synasp.[/b]
We're best friends. Oh wait, we never spoke until he joined the staff a few weeks ago.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
I do know that I received a huge stiff-arm from Babich when asked to communicate with him via phone. Not as an alternative to providing written documentation, but as a prelude.[/b]
Delays, delays, delays... Just provide evidence or apologize. Should I say this 40 more times?

No one is forcing you to apologize. No one can make you feel sorry. We provided you an opportunity to provide evidence. If you could not do that, we gave you a choice to apologize. You're not apologizing to the mods, but to Dark Shadow. You libeled him, not us.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
It felt to me very much like this had already been decided and this whole thing was just a dog and pony show.[/b]
I'm very sorry Gino, but we frankly don't have the time or interest to organize a debacle on this scale. Did you get my memo about canceling your attack on members? If not, here it is:

<start mind-control memo> Please do not attack other members, especially calling them recasters in public backed up only with "I just know" evidence. It's a silly defense, and I don't think anyone will buy it <end mind-control memo>

...

blab blab blab

...

<div class='quotetop'></div>
I believe that this was his intention. I suppose in hindsight what I should have done was have someone purchase his box with the extra greeblies. That would have given me the smoking gun evidence.[/b]
BINGO. At least now you admit you have no evidence.

If you were being recast, you could've gotten the "smoking gun" if you used tact. Now you'll never be able to prove it, but at least you recognize this fact. That's a step in the right direction.

This is yet another example of why people should keep a level head (not to mention ruining other people's reputations, as well as your own).

Let me throw back your type of "apology":

I'm sorry for X and Y, but I'm not really because I'm still right, and X and Y is still true.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
I don't think that because evidence (answers to my questions/photographs) weren't given to me from Dark Shadow, that I should be considered wrong by default. According to the admin (synasp), I fear this is how they view it. It's like demanding a chef to build you a cake, but then not giving him access to the kitchen.[/b]
Hey, I like that analogy. Good job. Here's one:

It's like Chef Boyardee claiming Keebler Elves copied his cake, and demanding the police give Chef Boyardee the Elve's recipes so Mr. Boyardee can "analyze" their ingredients.

Nice try, bub. It's not very scientific to start with a conclusion, then go fishing for "facts" to support that conclusion.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
Based on what I've laid out here, I would hope that people would understand why I would react the way I did, and why I believe what I do.[/b]
Ooooh, no doubt they do. :eek:

No one is denying you're a very talented person, Gino, with lots to offer when you feel like it. But this issue isn't about artistic skill, and the sooner you see that, the better.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
Where there is a routine group of people, (and you know who I'm talking about) who are there to consistently dump on anything you say or post, it's going to bring out a little bit of "in your face" type of posts.[/b]
Starting a thread calling out Dark Shadow as a recaster has nothing to do with people "dumping" on you. And as for Ghost Host, you went out of your way to attack him when you were all warned before to avoid each other. And if that wasn't enough, you called him a recaster. Please don't blame your actions on other people "ganging up" on you.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
If I do have a chip on my shoulder, I can tell you that this small group of people were the ones who put it there and it is for them, not everyone.[/b]
Oookay, neeeevermind. Go ahead and blame your actions on other people... :rolleyes

<div class='quotetop'></div>
I don't think it is right to be banned for standing up for myself in the face of what I feel is a VERY plausible case of having my items recast.[/b]
I don't either, and we wouldn't be having this discussion if you took your own advice and thought about getting evidence before throwing rocks at people in public.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
I suppose in the future, in a similar scenario, I would approach it by posting a thread saying something like, I have serious suspicions of being recast and here's why.[/b]
NO NO NO. Damnit have you not learned from this experience? This is exactly what you did--post a thread saying someone else recast you when you have zero evidence. Keep your suspicions to yourself, or to trusted friends. GET THE EVIDENCE. You might be (or will be, in this case) surprised that there is NO evidence, and you just saved yourself from libeling someone in public, and getting another "apologize or provide evidence." But if you DO find concrete evidence, bring it to the mods, and with a level head the facts will be brought to public, and the recaster banned.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
Why am I the only one being called to task on it? Especially, when in both cases that I've cried foul, I've done my best to lay it out or provide what I can to substantiate my claim.[/b]
You've done your best to complain about the process, and to avoid providing evidence.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
I despise super long winded posts, but I do have a gun to my head so to speak.[/b]
Again, you have the choice between providing evidence (since you were sure enough to call someone out in public, you must have evidence, right? no?) or, if you were wrong, you have the choice to apologize and hopefully right your wrong.

I apologize for trying to get you to do the right thing, even though I'm not really sorry at all. (I learn that one recently.)
 
Wow... there is surely no bias here. Synasp, I don't know you from the man in the moon, but your overall tone and sarcasm in these two posts clearly shows, from an administrative standpoint, you are out of line and not in a position to handle this particular issue. While every mod/admin is only human, lashing out openly as you have in these posts (and yes, you ARE lashing out, not just defending yourself) shows that you have allowed your emotions and personal feelings to overpower your ability to remain objective and neutral. It is interesting to see you berating Gino like a child while you are acting like one yourself.
While I know Gino has been a huge pain in the collective ass of the admins here as well as the sithlord/vader darth circle, I find it interesting that he has been singled out when some in that circle has done the very same things he has done. I recall when the GH recasting thread was posted that Gino was called out as a recaster on the open forum. It was a point-blank accusation, with absolutely no proof shown. Simple mud slinging in a vain effort to deflect the mud Gino was slinging at GH. Yet, there have been no public apologies or threats of bannishments due to those accusations which were never backed up. I guess what is good for the goose is not good for the gander or his friends... Charge forward and do what you will. While I almost always have agreed with and supported the actions of this administration, this particular case reeks of partiality.
 
It'll be a sad day if Gino is banned... No accurate Vader stuff posted at all. :( Or TKs.

Gino is bagged on day and night on here - it's the truth. By the same folks over and over.

And I ain't no blind follower either.

Edited for clarity. :)
 
i also had a run in with synasp about something i was joking about on a thread , it was the thread that someone had used photo shop to repaint a white vader as hello kitty. he just would not let it go... , whats this guys problem?
 
<div class='quotetop'>(Brak's Buddy @ Aug 15 2006, 12:05 AM) [snapback]1300510[/snapback]</div>
Wow... there is surely no bias here. Synasp, I don't know you from the man in the moon, but your overall tone and sarcasm in these two posts clearly shows, from an administrative standpoint, you are out of line and not in a position to handle this particular issue. While every mod/admin is only human, lashing out openly as you have in these posts (and yes, you ARE lashing out, not just defending yourself) shows that you have allowed your emotions and personal feelings to overpower your ability to remain objective and neutral. It is interesting to see you berating Gino like a child while you are acting like one yourself.
While I know Gino has been a huge pain in the collective ass of the admins here as well as the sithlord/vader darth circle, I find it interesting that he has been singled out when some in that circle has done the very same things he has done. I recall when the GH recasting thread was posted that Gino was called out as a recaster on the open forum. It was a point-blank accusation, with absolutely no proof shown. Simple mud slinging in a vain effort to deflect the mud Gino was slinging at GH. Yet, there have been no public apologies or threats of bannishments due to those accusations which were never backed up. I guess what is good for the goose is not good for the gander or his friends... Charge forward and do what you will. While I almost always have agreed with and supported the actions of this administration, this particular case reeks of partiality.
[/b]


Agreed. Talk about conduct unbecoming a mod. Wow. I mean, how can you chastise someone whose defense you admittedly didn't bother to read in its entirety? Brutal. :thumbsdown
 
I had no idea synasp was a member of staff here, as i just don't follow the announcements and News section. But while reading synasp's post, i had to scroll back up to double check that i saw RPF staff under his name, as most, if not all of his post was very childish.

Keith.
 
<div class='quotetop'>(Keith @ Aug 15 2006, 12:20 AM) [snapback]1300524[/snapback]</div>
I had no idea synasp was a member of staff here, as i just don't follow the announcements and News section. But while reading synasp's post, i had to scroll back up to double check that i saw RPF staff under his name, as most, if not all of his post was very childish.

Keith.
[/b]
yes this is the same problem i had with him .... i found him very childish..
 
Regarding the GH recast accusation to me it seems ridiculous to expect Gino to have to make an apology to GH considering both the verbal and written evidence presented directly by the victim (JW) to the RPF staff. Whether the RPF admin wants to believe that this individual has a motive to lie is another issue.

Does the admin deny receiving any of the above evidence or is first hand testimony not credible evidence?

I understand from Rocketeer25 that this is only a small part of the overall complaint but I don't see how you can say that Gino didn't provide any evidence.
 
<div class='quotetop'>(Brak's Buddy @ Aug 14 2006, 07:05 PM) [snapback]1300510[/snapback]</div>
Synasp, I don't know you from the man in the moon, but your overall tone and sarcasm in these two posts clearly shows, from an administrative standpoint, you are out of line and not in a position to handle this particular issue.[/b]
I'm not handling this particular issue. I don't need to be impartial anymore, though I suppose as a mod, I really should curb the sarcasm. Point taken. My apologies. I'm just really baffled how Gino still denies any wrong doing. But yes, I should keep in mind that my "mod hat" is always on, even when I'm not involved.

<div class='quotetop'></div>
I recall when the GH recasting thread was posted that Gino was called out as a recaster on the open forum.[/b]
I believe that was when everyone involved was given warnings.

TK-427: you were making fun of homosexuals when I PMed you. Stop instigating.

jeezycreezy: I did read his post in its entirety. I guess I was offended by Gino's accusations that I've been plotting to set him up, and I somehow made him do these things (as he wont accept responsibility). It furiates me to no end when someone can't accept responsibility for their own actions, and instead tries to blame others.

shotty mod behavior? yes. But as Gino has said, I'm not involved with this case anymore, so I post as a member, forgetting I'm always stuck as a mod. Stupid move on my part, I know.
 
To clarify, the issue that we are discussing here is Gino's accusation that Dark Shadow had recasted some of his pieces.

I took over the moderation of this issue and set forth some ground rules for my interaction with the involved parties.

Gino was given two options:
1. Provide the RPF staff (me in this case) with extensive proprietary photographic evidence as well as any other supporting documentation for our consideration that without a doubt evidences that Dark Shadow is recasting your work by Monday, August 14th at 5:00pm PST.
2. Publicly apologize to Dark Shadow and forward me the link to that apology by Monday, August 14th, at 5:00pm PST.

Gino has decided to include an explanation with his apology. It is up to the one he accused as to whether or not Gino's statement is sufficient.

If the apology is not acceptable, then Gino will receive a pip, if the apology is acceptable, then the issue is resolved. After reviewing further documentation, I was incorrect in my initial communication with Gino, this would be his third written warning by the board and not his fourth, therefore if Gino were to receive a pip, he would not be banned unless he chose to earn another pip at some later date.

Either way, the lesson to be learned is this: If there is an issue on the board where someone is recasting your work and you are prepared to prove it, please pm the mods first before confronting another member.

-Bryan
 
<div class='quotetop'>(bbabich @ Aug 14 2006, 09:03 PM) [snapback]1300566[/snapback]</div>
If the apology is not acceptable, then Gino will receive a pip, if the apology is acceptable, then the issue is resolved. After reviewing further documentation, I was incorrect in my initial communication with Gino, this would be his third written warning by the board and not his fourth, therefore if Gino were to receive a pip, he would not be banned unless he chose to earn another pip at some later date.
-Bryan
[/b]

I apologize for taking this off-topic, but what is a PIP? Does have anything to do with the rating system that is in place that none of us can see?

http://www.therpf.com/index.php?showtopic=92718

Thanks.

Tom
 
What Lonnie said...

;)

Thanks for asking the question, I apologize for throwing that slang term in there.

-Bryan
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top