GINO
Sr Member
@vaderdarth:
All this alternate mold nonsense needs to stop.
There is only one ANH Vader style mold in the archives, the one we've been referring to as the Baker mold.
It's the same mold that produced the SL and DJ.
To insinuate otherwise is just another means to try to discredit or create doubt in regards to the eFX offering.
This is just another shade of you insinuating that eFX or myself is not being honest and that is unacceptable.
It has been said many times over in this thread, that there was absolute minimal necessary clean up performed on both versions of helmet necessary for mass production (of course more on the limited version).
Aspects that were filled in or sanded off were deliberate, extremely minimal, and performed to ensure smooth manufacture as well as pleasing the greatest number of eFX customers.
A casting like the SL will have more of the boogers/scratches/air bubbles, but the eFX has the correct shapes.
So which is considered better? I suppose it's a matter of preference.
I personally would prefer a casting that had most of those warts and a correct shape (the eFX), than a casting that had all of the warts and an incorrect shape (the SL).
Pleasing everyone is an impossible task, but pleasing the greater majority is achievable and I think we've done that successfully.
And I'm confident that 99% of the people who were lucky enough to get either version will be more than satisfied, and find that it exceeds their expectations.
.
All this alternate mold nonsense needs to stop.
There is only one ANH Vader style mold in the archives, the one we've been referring to as the Baker mold.
It's the same mold that produced the SL and DJ.
To insinuate otherwise is just another means to try to discredit or create doubt in regards to the eFX offering.
This is just another shade of you insinuating that eFX or myself is not being honest and that is unacceptable.
It has been said many times over in this thread, that there was absolute minimal necessary clean up performed on both versions of helmet necessary for mass production (of course more on the limited version).
Aspects that were filled in or sanded off were deliberate, extremely minimal, and performed to ensure smooth manufacture as well as pleasing the greatest number of eFX customers.
A casting like the SL will have more of the boogers/scratches/air bubbles, but the eFX has the correct shapes.
So which is considered better? I suppose it's a matter of preference.
I personally would prefer a casting that had most of those warts and a correct shape (the eFX), than a casting that had all of the warts and an incorrect shape (the SL).
Pleasing everyone is an impossible task, but pleasing the greater majority is achievable and I think we've done that successfully.
And I'm confident that 99% of the people who were lucky enough to get either version will be more than satisfied, and find that it exceeds their expectations.
.
Last edited: