finalfrontier
Active Member
No problemo.
I’m good to go as well. Got all my confirmations!!! #64!!!
Hope this piece turns out well. The price tag of 600 bucks sounds really to good to be true. I mean the MRE was 1200 back in 2008…14 years ago!
But if they turn out a fantastic product I’m am so in on The Refit…even if they charge 900 for that.
Using the inflation calculator.I’m good to go as well. Got all my confirmations!!! #64!!!
Hope this piece turns out well. The price tag of 600 bucks sounds really to good to be true. I mean the MRE was 1200 back in 2008…14 years ago!
But if they turn out a fantastic product I’m am so in on The Refit…even if they charge 900 for that.
Right, interesting thought. “Hey, Chris - go raise 50% of the cost via word of mouth and we’ll cover the rest out of marketing and recoup from future sales of the full price refit and beyond.”I'm beginning to wonder if the perceived to be as "lacking" way they handled this campaign may have been by design. Why would they intentionally do that unless it was to create a fervor for future projects with a low edition and offer a "first taste is free" introductory price similar to what Eaglemoss did to draw you into an expensive sub? But then that doesn't explain the horrible problems they've had handling the payments. It's an interesting conspiracy theory, but the evidence doesn't really support it.
Well, it looks like they already slipped from Summer 2023 to Fall 2023. And in the fine print:
Well, it looks like they already slipped from Summer 2023 to Fall 2023. And in the fine print:
“Pending licensor approval”
They don’t have the license for this yet???
That's not what the statement means. They *do* have a license for the model. But, as everyone has noted - including TOMY - what they are showing is just a prototype, not the final production model. And, as with all such licenses, the licensor has approval on that final production model.“Pending licensor approval”
They don’t have the license for this yet???
Thanks for the education guys.That's not what the statement means. They *do* have a license for the model. But, as everyone has noted - including TOMY - what they are showing is just a prototype, not the final production model. And, as with all such licenses, the licensor has approval on that final production model.
As CD says, this is very normal.
Yeah. Was looking forward to the update and then … dated July 7.Edit: Nevermind
I got an email that seemed to act like it was a new article but it turns out it's from a month ago and they're just sending it out again