This forum is intended for interest gauging and active runs. Due to the transient nature of this forum, please keep all research and ongoing discussion in one of our main forums so your information is not lost.
Only Premium Members can start a new run.
I meant to post this when I liked your comment, but thank you for posting those photos. They made me that much more excited to receive mine lolGreat work as always, Indy! Also: thanks so much to JEM, squidman and others for helping to make these as close as they are. I’ve waited a long time to have this in my collection!
It won't matter anymore, but it's possible that the screen used frame could be even bigger than the size that was decided for the replica. I never brought up the next potential size I suspected, 56-21-142 (maybe 22-147), and 145 total front width because I just could not picture a frame that size fitting Bryan Cranston's face so well that it doesn't stick beyond his hairline on the sides – well enough that sometimes it even looks on the small side. Not as small as the 48-24 plastic frame he's wearing in breakingbadmrwhite's photo, but small enough that the only way I could make sense of it looking significantly smaller is that maybe a smaller frame was used. Glasses do tend to come in multiple sizes, after all. :\
If Mr. Art Andrews posts a photo, or dimensions, they can be found engraved on the inside of the bridge. There's even a number there that identifies the frame model.
Me too, i look forward to receiving itI'm still waiting on mine to arrive.![]()
I would feel better but the tracking info for them hasn't updated since the 9th of Feb.Me too, i look forward to receiving it![]()
I cannot tell you, i've chosen the option "Flat Rate Airmail" without tracking number. Maybe you should ask Indy.I would feel better but the tracking info for them hasn't updated since the 9th of Feb.
Indy, are these produced in one run? Have you ever sold enough pairs of a glasses replica to need to re-order...
Version 3 of the schematic (53mm and 21mm), which is what was last posted here, still wasn't correct when I was comparing multiple high resolution images through my method to determine the potential size. At the very last minute, I contacted Indy Magnoli to make the lens size 54 mm, and the bridge 20mm. The replica has those dimensions.J EM, are you saying that Indy's replicas might be slightly undersized? What are you comparing them to that makes you think they might be?
So the screen used Aden frame has a 54mm lens size and 19mm bridge? What a relief. The replica is only off by 1mm on the bridge!We were very close on the frame sizes, though closer on the bridge on the next-to-last draft. The production glasses Art has are 54mm (eyes), 19mm (bridge). We once had 53/19 (damn close!) but landed at 53/21 (still, really close). Of course, we'll have to assume Art's pair is consistent with the hero pair. The prop dept would likely allow 1mm variations on the frames they liked best, knowing they were impossible to simply order in bulk at the exact same specs.
Indy, are these produced in one run? Have you ever sold enough pairs of a glasses replica to need to re-order - and, if so, are able to make adjustments to the plans at that time? If you ever make these again with a 1mm wider eye and 2mm narrower bridge, please let us know! I'd order more of 'em for sure. Until then, I'm beyond happy to have what we have. Thank you again for making it happen!
I'm still gonna say this was a great effort in coming so close on such an unknowable item. Nice work, fellas! And Art, thanks for letting this tidbit on your expensive production piece go public![]()
We were all calling them hooks because we didn't really know what they were. Hilco calls them locking channels. They are closed "loops", and if your frame has them welded similar to this shape ¯U¯ on the inside of the temples, they're correct.One more small thing to note, should these ever have the opportunity for slight revision in a 2nd run: the side shield hooks appear to be instead closed loops, attached to the arms at both ends rather than true hooks welded only at the back.
Another tiny point, of course - still loving these replicas![]()
One more small thing to note, should these ever have the opportunity for slight revision in a 2nd run: the side shield hooks appear to be instead closed loops, attached to the arms at both ends rather than true hooks welded only at the back.
Another tiny point, of course - still loving these replicas![]()