Is it too outlandish to think replicants interacted with Deckard at least a little bit after he was in Vegas? I'd imagine he had told Rachel about the unicorn and sent along the wooden one to be passed to her/the child. Or when they were separated, the handing off a meaningful momento before she left doesn't sound crazy at all...
The bees are what concern me. I know one friend said it was ridiculous that the power still worked in the theater...It was obviously powered by bees.
I think it is outlandish, because it would defeat the point of him disappearing if people knew where he was. I believe he hasn't seen another person/replicant since he went off.
"Because that was the plan!"
Not too outlandish at all, the bottom line is that the horse/unicorn was in Vegas before the child got it, how it got it is unimportant. The other carvings are enough to set it up for mine.
Now the bees, I have a couple of ideas on those but telling them here is more trouble than its worth.
Exactly...I think the movie does a good job leading you to conclusions, and it just takes a little bit of reading in-between the lines. The fact that he has other animals carved makes the source of horse/unicorn VERY obvious.
I don't intend to purposefully stir the pot some more about Deckard, but I have been firmly in the "human" camp since I saw the original movie in a film class about 4 years ago. Last night, I sat down and watched the Final Cut again, and I think I may have shifted closer to the "there's definite potential he's a replicant" camp. The connection between Gaff and Bryant was a bit more obvious to me, and the fact that Deckard was brought in as opposed to formally asked to rejoin the force, etc. Now I have doubt in my beliefs, LOL. I can't say I think one-way or the other now. There's potential for either, and I feel like I need to make a solid decision here.
The source of the horse is indeed obvious: Deckard. Doesn't mean it was carved in Vegas.
ANYWAY. About the bees: don't they need flowers?
Kay flies the orphanage and finds the wooden horse. Next shot is him back at his apartment. How did he get back home?
His spinner was shot down smack in the middle of San Diego. That's 120 miles away. It doesn't look like there's really any public transport in the middle of that junkyard city.
Because it's unnecessary exposition. Do we really need a 1-5 minute scene showing us some like this?
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Well it’s a worn Hollywood trope that the hero magically appears at home. It doesn’t break the film for me. I still love the movie. If he had landed in Compton I wouldn’t bat an eye but he was in San Diego.Because it's unnecessary exposition. Do we really need a 1-5 minute scene showing us some like this?
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Well it’s a worn Hollywood trope that the hero magically appears at home. It doesn’t break the film for me. I still love the movie. If he had landed in Compton I wouldn’t bat an eye but he was in San Diego.
Of course. Of course.The source of the horse ...