Whilst I also appreciate that you have a different view - considering a lot of what you just mentioned...did you read the article? It addresses a lot of your concerns succinctly.
Also don't tell me "You're thinking.."
I didn't claim this Superman is like the "comics" (because only one interpretation exists doesnt it...) I said he is on the way to embodying some of those core characteristics we know and love. And has shown many of those qualities already. Nothing like the comics though...Have you read Superman: Earth One? Secret Identity? Even in Kingdom Come he retreats from society after losing Lois and being disgusted with the justice system etc. So I think there are many elements in this Superman that are derived from the comics.
The wording in some of your arguments is quite frustrating. He says "Nobody stays good in this world" as he flies off to try to convince a man who wants to kill him to help him, while another man whom he has never personally wronged has his mother bound and gagged, and had just pushed the love of his life off the top of a building, and had caused the deaths of hundreds (?) of innocent people in the senate explosion, specifically to hurt Superman. His faith is strained! He is being tested...he wants to believe in people but its ridiculously difficult, humanity is full of awful people doing awful things. Thats part of the whole thread of this film. Batman is also utterly despondent about the good in people. He doesn't trust humanity either. If we lived in a rosy world full of good people, what would be the point in Superheroes?
Conveniently forgetting the part where Martha says "Be their hero Clark, be their angel, be their monument. Be anything they need you to be. Or be none of it."? She is at once encouraging him to make the choice he is comfortable with and letting him know that she supports him in any circumstance.
"He wouldn't have wrecked Metropolis or killed Zod..." I'm joining @
teragon here because if people cannot see the story being told to them then I've no chance in explaining it.
http://www.manofsteelanswers.com/ :thumbsup
Honestly I tried reading the article and I couldnt get through it. Its like someone hired him to write that stuff.
Haha ok man. No need to get defensive.
In Kingdom Come he retreats from society because society didnt listen to him when Magog nuked Kansas/Midwest. Its funny that you mention Kingdom Come, considering the subject matter. Sure, there are elements of Superman from the comics in this film, the daily planet, perry white, metropolis, lois etc, but the core of the character isnt there. At all. Have you read All Star Superman? Do you see any of those characteristics of this version of Superman?
Its like youre blind to the reasoning behind all this stuff, from a film maker and story telling point of view. Yeah, he says that because Snyder doesnt get that about the character. What kind of baseless thing is that for Superman to say anyway? Thats the point about Superman, you know the never ending battle he is talking about? It pertains to everything that you just said. Keep on fighting and believing in people no matter what. The comic superman fights for truth, justice, and the american way. This movie version of Superman has no freaking morals, and I for one, dont want to watch a superman movie where he is confused about what he should do with his powers. And they already did that in MoS! Make Superman be Superman! The senate explosion, like I mentioned before, was ridiculous. Like Glunark said, someone cocks a gun against Lois, and he is there in 2 shakes, he cant scan the room with his Xray vision, cant hear the bomb or its components and going off and stop it? And the kidnapping of his mother either? Not to mention the logistics of the movie that you are ignoring, how did Lex even know who Superman even was? As the audience, we have no way of knowing how he deduced that! Its sloppy filmmaking.
Batman is a broken hero and is supposed be despondent because he has a reason to be, thats the core of his character. Thats not Superman! Like NeilT said, it can go the opposite way, like those people that were scared in the beginning of BvS. If the "heroes" are just as bad as the villains, whats the point, if anything they would escalate things. They were so ******* scared, they didnt want the police to let them out of a cage in fear of Batman.
I didnt "conveiently forget" that part. I mentioned the part that had the most weight. Yeah, thats great. And then later on we see pictures of her that look ripped out of a Saw movie. Thats another point of this thread, how bad the writing was.
If people want to tell that story of Superman killing people in the DC Murderverse(thats a thing btw) then thats a story I dont care to see. Batman is one thing, and Superman is another thing. Killing Zod at the end of MoS was such an example of hack writing, and bad storytelling, I dont know how else to slice it. If you take away what make the character that way, are they even still the same character? If this movie changed supermans origin of Krypton to pluto, and he landed in madagascar, would that still be superman?