tommynator1024
New Member
Gene, we're talking xenobiology here, so it's twice fictitious.
However, mutation as we know it is purely coincidental, and to take a few traits of host DNA (by ingestion!) and incorporate it in a way that still and always preserves the original xenomorphs foremost features, like way of reproduction, acidic blood, strength, endurance to environment, sounds a bit more fantastic than I think I can stomach (no pun intended), even from a sci-fi creature, let alone the fact that the two separate strains of DNA are compatible in any way at all. Try crossing a shark or gorilla with a cockroach or with a special Tibetan sort of fern, and you're closer to a viable lifeform than a Predator/Alien hybrid would be.
Personally, I believe lots of **** I see in sci-fi movies or books, based on this special universe sort of setting its own axioms. Like, the movie simply assumes that X is possible. Ok. But I do have to draw a line somewhere.
However, mutation as we know it is purely coincidental, and to take a few traits of host DNA (by ingestion!) and incorporate it in a way that still and always preserves the original xenomorphs foremost features, like way of reproduction, acidic blood, strength, endurance to environment, sounds a bit more fantastic than I think I can stomach (no pun intended), even from a sci-fi creature, let alone the fact that the two separate strains of DNA are compatible in any way at all. Try crossing a shark or gorilla with a cockroach or with a special Tibetan sort of fern, and you're closer to a viable lifeform than a Predator/Alien hybrid would be.
Personally, I believe lots of **** I see in sci-fi movies or books, based on this special universe sort of setting its own axioms. Like, the movie simply assumes that X is possible. Ok. But I do have to draw a line somewhere.
