nwjedidave
Sr Member
Ok - this thread about WHAT WE THOUGHT OF THE MOVIE has spun in to something else which is wayyyy off topic. Focus people!
That still doesn’t say he can do absolutely anything at any time instantaneously. “Degree of power”, in the sense of being “limitless” is a mathematical scalar. It speaks nothing of the dimensionality of it’s limitlessness.I’ll disagree on it being pure conjecture. Your interpretation may differ, but whenever Gamora, Wong, Dr. Strange, Nebula or anyone else “in the know” talk about the consequences of Thanos getting all six gems, it’s all framed as “His power will be limitless. Period.”
When you try to contort semantics to bolster your argument instead of addressing what is evendent you’re only being disingenuous.And, again, when you are the master of time, does “instantaneous” really mean anything anymore?
Since the latter would make for more logical inconsistency it stands to reason that the former condition is more plausible.Does the IG *really* require a fist or a finger-snap to work? Or is that just a physiological manifestation of Thanos’ concentration and focus? Do you actually need to furrow your eyebrows to think harder?
Whether it’s true or not I don’t get your point.Of course, Gamora talking about “snapping fingers” was a plot tool to telegraph what was happening when he actually snapped.
Yes. If you are trying to test the plausibility of the premise this is where the argument ends.Negligible in his “grand scheme”? Arguably.
No. Thanos makes a point to assure this selection is purely random. His ethics divorces him from allowing sentiment to affect the quality of his decision. He sees himself as an impartial executor of a beneficent principle. (Perhaps not unlike Themis, in that respect). Applying exceptions and conditions would seem a violation of that principle.But I think Markus & McFeely could have made a stronger case for “feeling for Thanos” if they showed him going out of his way to avoid millions or billions of ancillary deaths that were not required for his plan. Make no mistake, his plan is horrifying and must be prevented, of course, but it certainly would have added an fascinating (IMO) extra layer to the character if he took pains to make sure no one suffered unnecessarily.
My prediction:
Out of the 14,000,605 possible futures that Strange saw, only one resulted in victory for the good guys.
We are seeing that specific future unravel.
In order to beat Thanos, he has to win. He has to get what he wants, and the cost has to be so dear that it crushes him and makes him wonder if winning was worth the cost.
Killing Gamora and ruling over his empire without her there to pass that empire to is what breaks him.In the end, I bet he will sacrifice himself to bring her back, and in doing so, completely undo what he did since her death.
Anyone ever consider that this might be from part 2 of IW
http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p298/BobaDebt/IW_zpswumauogs.png
Killing Gamora and ruling over his empire without her there to pass that empire to is what breaks him.In the end, I bet he will sacrifice himself to bring her back, and in doing so, completely undo what he did since her death.
My prediction:
Out of the 14,000,605 possible futures that Strange saw, only one resulted in victory for the good guys.
We are seeing that specific future unravel.
In order to beat Thanos, he has to win. He has to get what he wants, and the cost has to be so dear that it crushes him and makes him wonder if winning was worth the cost.
Killing Gamora and ruling over his empire without her there to pass that empire to is what breaks him.In the end, I bet he will sacrifice himself to bring her back, and in doing so, completely undo what he did since her death.
That, or another option.
Thor goes full Berzerker Rage and completely destroys Thanos, picks up the Gauntlet, puts it on, and says "I, All-Father Thor Odinson, am the protector of the Nine Realms," then uses the power of the Infinity Stones to completely undo everything Thanos did.
Are they going to bring courting Death into this? I know they played around with it in a post credits sequence a while back. Or do you think they've abandoned that storyline? It seems like they've gone a different direction with Thanos.
When did they mention courting Death in a post-credits sequence? I don't remember any mention of that at all. Fiege and the Russo's have said more than once that Death (the personification thereof, that is) isn't a factor here.
When did they mention courting Death in a post-credits sequence? I don't remember any mention of that at all. Fiege and the Russo's have said more than once that Death (the personification thereof, that is) isn't a factor here.
Well, now we know it’s death with a little “d.”Avengers post credit scene. Dude tells Thanos that his army lost in New York and that fighting The Avengers was to court death. Thanos turns and grins.
Well, now we know it’s death with a little “d.”
Are you saying what I think you're saying about Thanos?
Yes. I think his team could use a better defense.Are you saying what I think you're saying about Thanos?
Avengers post credit scene. Dude tells Thanos that his army lost in New York and that fighting The Avengers was to court death. Thanos turns and grins.
Oh I thought they had.
I found it. It looks like it was referenced in the original Avengers.
However, it's entirely possible that that's what they were starting toward, but then course-corrected later to the much stronger storyline we got in the actual film.