Aladdin (Post-release)

What did you think of Aladdin?

  • It was disappointing.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    10
Yea, I feel like live action may need to get categorized differently. "Live action-practical", meaning most costumes and effects are created in the real world and filmed; and "live action-performance" or "live action-capture" where people's movements and expressions are used as templates for mostly CG elements.

Something.
 
Update on what I said about Jasmine being ... passible. I looked at some stills and I think think they withdrew just a bit from the exoticism of the hottest Disney Princess. I think they gave the cartoon a nose job and got away from the “Shoe-on-Head” eye liner. Naomi Scott is very pretty and actually looks more “ethnic” in some Googled head shots than in stills from this movie.

With Bollywood actresses Priyanka Chopra and Deepika Padukone breaking into Hollywood they could have introduced a younger Bollywood actress to play this Middle Eastern part. I can’t say anything about the acting but at least we know they could sing and dance. I really wanted the strong nose.

I’m thinking someone like a young Diana Penty.

DAINA-PANTY.jpg


A younger Penelope Cruz or Eva Green would have also looked great. Naomi is looking a little watered-down but maybe her performance can change my mind.
 
Last edited:
This goes on the list of films I'll never see. Disney-fying the story for kids is fine with a cartoon. Cartoon action and lack of consequences in live action (even mostly CGI) filming doesn't really work, that goes for talking animals too. ;)
 
I think Disney was actually doing well with Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast and Jungle Book. I thought Mary Poppins Returns was surprisingly good. I thought Maleficent was a good movie but probably not a classic to me. I refuse to see Alice in Wonderland. I’m not looking forward to Dumbo. I had been hopeful about Aladdin.

So I’m not against the live action adaptations in principle because I think they’ve proven how well they could be done.

I don’t know if the Disney winning streak is over. Maybe we need Lassiter - even if it’s as a silent partner. I kinda want them to mothball Mulan and Little Mermaid until Disney gets their act together.
 
I think Disney was actually doing well with Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast and Jungle Book.

I don’t know if the Disney winning streak is over. Maybe we need Lassiter - even if it’s as a silent partner. I kinda want them to mothball Mulan and Little Mermaid until Disney gets their act together.


Cinderella was a good hit for Disney. Lily James was a great choice along with the other cast members. The movie was very playful and mostly enjoyable.

Have not seen B&B yet, I’ll get to it at some point. Just have a hard time with their choice as belle. Not a bad actress, just not who I would picture as Belle. I think they chose her cause of Hermione being a book worm. Figure they could pull the idea and get fan base to be go alone with it. Emmy Rossum would have been my choice. Also no can beat Ron Perlman as the beast lol

Mulan is coming out next year. They have a very good cast for the movie. I think it rivals the Cinderella cast...almost.

Btw Snow White is the fairest of all the Disney Princess.
 
IRC the animated 'Aladdin' was the film that Disney discovered if they made it entertaining for adults as well as children the grownups could handle seeing repeated viewings- that was Robin Williams role in the movie.

I do think the live action 'Cinderella' and 'Beauty and the Beast' worked well- I do not know if it is something in the film concepts themselves or with the people producing but some of these new wave of live action reimagings are great and others seem to really miss the mark.
 
I can sorta handle the Genie CGI. Those movements are fixable. The real atrocity is Jafar's voice and no Gilbert Gottfried.

I'm also hearing people are say Disney's Aladdin is racist because it stereotypes the Middle East. Not sure how faithful the story is to the original fable, but the story originates from the 1001 Arabian Nights, a compilation of Middle Eastern folk stories. I picked up the original Aladdin last night and plan to find out just how close the Disney version is to the original story for myself.
8oYTBP4.jpg
 
So, I'm not sure I get the Jaffar hate just yet. He's sending aladin into the cave and says something unmenacingly... he tempered his tone with most people while he was still the court adviser. we all just think of him as being big mean and lound, cause those were the best scenes we remember of him. When he's in private, **** talking with iago, and when he's gone full on villainous monologue.
 
I'm also hearing people are say Disney's Aladdin is racist because it stereotypes the Middle East. Not sure how faithful the story is to the original fable, but the story originates from the 1001 Arabian Nights, a compilation of Middle Eastern folk stories. I picked up the original Aladdin last night and plan to find out just how close the Disney version is to the original story for myself.
Spoiler alert: Almost not at all. Some characters have the same names, and the "touch nothing but the lamp". And there's a sultan and his daughter, the princess, who Aladdin has the hots for (the princess, not the sultan), and the sultan has a vizier who is less than thrilled with Aladdin showing up. And that's about it. You're about to read it, so I won't summarize here, but the original is definitely not what we would call PC today -- and not because of its portrayal of Central Asian people. There's some pretty-messed-up-by-today's-standards attitudes about and treatment of women. And the main character is a bit of an idiot and a jerk.
 
I don't think there is anything wrong with casting Smith as the Genie, I do however think there is something wrong with who ever did the cgi for this movie. It looks like JibJab did the Genie part :eek:
 
My family and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Yes, Smith is a CGI genie but I did not find it distracting. I felt that all of the actor performances were solid.
I saw the original in theaters in the early 1990s, so I think I have a pretty good comparison.

1. In the animated film the vendor/salesman at the beginning of the film who introduces us to the lamp story, originally was supposed to have another cameo at the end where you see he was actually the genie all along, telling his own story. This film does the same thing, but with a different setup.
2. They expand on the characters of Jaffar, the sultan, and Jasmine. Overall, I think it benefits story.
3. Genie has a romantic interest, which ties back to the very beginning. Surprisingly, it works.
4. The parrot Iago is voiced by Alan Tudyk. No, it’s not Godfried exasperated conversational level. Alan plays it like a very intelligent bird: he talks in short repititious sentences, like a real parrot would.
5. There are additional dance numbers, including at the end credits. Bollywood and hip hop.
6. Will Smith makes the genie his own. I did not feel anyway he took away or denigrated Robin Williams performance. You can’t help but compare the two,
7. Jaffar is mor villainous in this one. Conniving, more purpose driven. And no, he does not sound little girl in the film.
8. The story is 90% the same as the original Disney animated film, with some little twists along the way.
 
Just saw it really enjoyed it. The original was my wife and my first date. It really felt like the animated version which is what I wanted out if it. The weakest thing for me was Jafar. He just wasn’t as menacing as the animated version.
 
The only issue I had was Will Smith's Genie. I know it comes from my own inability to really separate Genie from Robin Williams. Probably because of how it was handled originally with the animators essentially working from Robin's performance, rather than the other way round.

For me it is like hearing Sammy Hagar sing Hot for Teacher. It's Van Halen and I like it. It just doesn't quite feel the same.
 
Back
Top