Thank you.Nerds.
Thank you.Nerds.
I know it's been said already, but re-booting franchises every few years.
A new Fantastic 4 series? Count me out. Re-booting a movie I saw as a kid (I'm in my 40s now) is tough enough, but a movie I only saw new in the theaters a few years ago?
People say Hollywood permanently ran out of ideas they're willing to invest in not long ago. This only proves there seems to be merit to that theory.
Funny, I was watching, "Force Ten from Navarone" just last night and saw Harrison Ford d exactly this and I wondered about it, too.People shaving that are obviously already clean shaven.
Especially when they leave bits of shaving cream behind, and when they wipe it off, the stubble is gone under those bits too.
I know it's been said already, but re-booting franchises every few years.
A new Fantastic 4 series? Count me out. Re-booting a movie I saw as a kid (I'm in my 40s now) is tough enough, but a movie I only saw new in the theaters a few years ago?
People say Hollywood permanently ran out of ideas they're willing to invest in not long ago. This only proves there seems to be merit to that theory.
LAKE PLACID VS ANACONDA, 3 HEADED SHARK ( or any scifi chanell movie )
There's a vast difference between bad CG and good CG and I'm tired of all of this CG bashing since a lot of the times there's CG (not necessarily 3D models) used in a movie where no one has any idea there was CG. You really can't use those crappy SyFy Originals as examples to say that all CG is bad, they're just low budget films with everything done on the cheap and would have been just as bad if they were done back before the days of modern CG, if at all. For every low budget crapfest with low budget effects you have shows like Firefly, & BSG whose CG still holds up pretty well to this day and you have films like Ant Man, & Guardian's of the Galaxy that help showcase what can be done with CG.
I took a course in theater design when I was in college, just for the heck of it, and they taught that no matter how bad a background you have on stage, the audience will simply ignore how bad it looks and fill in the 'reality' that's supposed to be behind your actors. I think that some CGI, even the good stuff, is like that. Take the first Jurassic Park movie for example, you can tell which is the full-sized Stan Winston dinosaur and which is CGI. And that was really well-done CGI work.
I love Steven Segal movies! Dont ask me why because I will not answer! However, I noticed in several of his later "3 word titled movies" that many directors are using a technique of moving the camera / zooming in and out WAY too much during car chases hoping to give the viewer the feeling of speed and peril.
Sadly, it doesn't work. Therefore, I must insist all car chases reach speeds of 80-120 MPH before filming.
disaster is eminent. one scientist knows whats happening, one of his relatives is a cop and all of his three kids are in dangerzone.
sums up 98% of disaster movies. comon, find something new in hollywood!