Cephus
Master Member
I know, but most of the sponsored cars are the high-end luxury style vehicles. Barely any of their middle-class can only afford vehicles are ever shown.
On TV they are, Ford and Chevy sponsor a lot of TV shows.
I know, but most of the sponsored cars are the high-end luxury style vehicles. Barely any of their middle-class can only afford vehicles are ever shown.
Two things about cars:
1. Product placement. I swear that the only good episodes of the walking dead are the one's without a Hyundai.
2. Average characters driving vintage cars. No one really does that unless they are into cars. Skyler white wouldn't have that old jeep wagon. She would have a dodge caravan.
On TV they are, Ford and Chevy sponsor a lot of TV shows.
And they are typically the newest vehicle, not something that that is so average or within a 10 year period old, the clear coat coming off of the vehicle and the paint fading, with dents and scratches from years of use. The only vehicle I can think of that wasn't as such was Walter White's Pontiac Aztec in Breaking Bad, which was a commercial failure and purposefully selected to reflect how pathetic Walter White was.
Of course, those are the vehicles the sponsor wants to show off and sell to the viewer. That's the whole point of doing it. TV sponsorships aren't charity, they're advertising.
Speaking of The Walking Dead, who's cutting the grass?
I live in Ohio and cut my grass at least once a week.
And it's weird, on the tv show "Last Man on Earth', there are no cars on any road. They are all tucked away. I guess it was easier to do it that way. No need to stage elaborate pile-ups.
I don't disagree, but fans of the television series were very vocal about their dislike of the movie. Can you imagine how bad it would have been if the producers of the movie had used a different car for the General Lee? :eek...I get the idea of The Dukes of Hazzard TV show using a 1969 Dodge Charger for the Dukes because they were more available that its believable the Duke Boys would find one on the cheap and fix it up for doing racing. But for the Dukes of Hazzard movie that came out a few years ago, it doesn't make sense because racing nowadays is different than how it was in the 1970s...
I don't disagree, but fans of the television series were very vocal about their dislike of the movie. Can you imagine how bad it would have been if the producers of the movie had used a different car for the General Lee? :eek
As for General Lee, I liked that they addressed the CSA flag on the hood in a modern context and explained why it was there (as a lifelong historical re-enactor, I loved that Cooter and his pals were Confederate re-enactors). The only way you'd get away with that painted on a car today, even in the South, would be as a replica of that very car.
Unless, of course, the lead character's car is used for comedic effect like the 1970 Chevy Nova Eddie Murphy's character drove in Beverly Hills Cop.
It depends on where you live, I guess.Eh? I see the Confederate Flag on cars all over: large car magnets, semi-transparent rear window decals, painted on hoods, full-size 3'x5' flags on poles mounted in the truck bed... and I live in Pennsylvania!
Star Trek did this all the time. You'd see an oblique view of the view screen, and the person at the other end was looking away from the camera. Like a giant aline head is mounted in the front of the bridge, looking away from the camera, as you're looking at the side of their head, something you couldn't see in a 2D image no matter how clear it is when the alien is talking with the Enterprise crew head-on!
The middle name of one of my former bosses was "Robert E. Lee"; he was from Missouri. Whenever anyone who knew him found out, their response was almost always something to the effect of, "Yeah, that figures," simply because it fit his personality....I grew up as a confederate re-enactor and my brother and I were both named after Confederate Generals...
Yes, in-universe the viewscreens on Star Trek were supposed to be 3D/holographic. That being the case, and since they were already in use as viewscreens, why have a separate holographic projector just for communications?That something I never understood at all.... was it suppose to represent 3D and if so why have a screen at all and just have a hologram? Made absolutely no sense whatsoever!