cboath
Master Member
Re: Star Wars Anthology (Young Han Solo)
That's a flat load. Sorry, but 99% of people would never have noticed if they didn't know that he had been dead 20 years. THAT was the give away. Not anything on the screen. Knowing he's dead you immediately scrutinize it and come the conclusion it was digital because it couldn't be done any other way. I do this stuff myself and it blew me away what they were able to accomplish. Saying it's crap is nothing but a slap in the face to those who've ever done any character work. You won't see anything better than that for nearly 5-10 years i'd wager. Faster and maybe more of it, yes, but not better.
I told my boss it was digital today and he was floored. He had no clue. That's because he had no clue that the guy was dead.
I will take a real actor over those CG monstrosities any day. Literally splicing in 30 random minutes of puppy abortions would have been less tonally jarring than the CG "humans" in R1.
But I'm pretty firmly back in the "a Han Solo movie is pointless crap nostalgia stroking" camp after R1.
That's a flat load. Sorry, but 99% of people would never have noticed if they didn't know that he had been dead 20 years. THAT was the give away. Not anything on the screen. Knowing he's dead you immediately scrutinize it and come the conclusion it was digital because it couldn't be done any other way. I do this stuff myself and it blew me away what they were able to accomplish. Saying it's crap is nothing but a slap in the face to those who've ever done any character work. You won't see anything better than that for nearly 5-10 years i'd wager. Faster and maybe more of it, yes, but not better.
I told my boss it was digital today and he was floored. He had no clue. That's because he had no clue that the guy was dead.