I might be thinking of Wes. I'm bad with names.
Sent from my Hewlett Packard 48G using Tapatalk
I am literally laughing out loud at that one!!
I might be thinking of Wes. I'm bad with names.
Sent from my Hewlett Packard 48G using Tapatalk
I might be thinking of Wes. I'm bad with names.
Sent from my Hewlett Packard 48G using Tapatalk
sorry guys i didnt mean to take this thread off topic. i was confused
As for the film, I am glad they don't plan on making a sequel. I would rather them start something else Ghostbusters related. There were many cool cameos, throw backs and Easter eggs and I just recently learned my friend's daughter's dance instructor was one of the background army soldiers!
That's the thing, it would have been so easy for them to make it continuation of the original, a few lines here, another few lines there and it establishes the movie as basically Ghostbusters 3. It might not have made it a much better film but by throwing a bone to the fans it certainly would have bought both Feige and the studio some goodwill with the fans and might have actually resulted in a few more tickets sold.
Or at least one to be a daughter, and maybe 2 of the others to have visited them on a school trip when younger or something and they loved it. Something like that. The trailer made it look more like that in the first place.I was hoping for the girls to be the daughters of the original cast, regardless I love seeing my local areas on the big screen.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Or at least one to be a daughter, and maybe 2 of the others to have visited them on a school trip when younger or something and they loved it. Something like that. The trailer made it look more like that in the first place.
Exactly. Or they could even have it where they're no relation but were interested and bought a franchise/got permission from the originals to start their own branch, or take over because they retired or were forced out. Regardless, lots could have been done to tie the new one to the originals without it affecting the base story at all, just slightly different dialogue at a few points early on and that's it, nothing else would need to change except for maybe the cameos.
I gather there was plenty that was new in the film, so Feig did get a lot of what he wanted, but it sounded like a film that wasn't clear on its identity and fell into the classic reboot trap: If you go too far from the source material, why'd you make it a reboot? If you just recycle the old film, why'd you bother doing a new movie at all?
And in the end, all of this only came to be because Harold Ramis was dead and couldn't oppose it anymore (just my hunch there).
Maybe that will change after "CHIPS" and "Baywatch". They might go in the opposite direction. Make "Gilligan's Island" into a gritty survival/horror movie.The typical studio thinking is "when in doubt, make a total joke out of it."
Sorry this is unrelated, but after reading the article I had to mention it. I used to be an avid reader of moviehole, then I got distracted by other things and kind of forgot about it. What the hell happened to it? There is so much going on with that website, its like an ADD persons wet dream. Its so busy I thought I was going to ahve a seizure looking at it. Blaugh. :wackohttp://moviehole.net/2017118962next-ghostbusters-might-be-a-crossover-movie
This just needs to die already.
Sorry this is unrelated, but after reading the article I had to mention it. I used to be an avid reader of moviehole, then I got distracted by other things and kind of forgot about it. What the hell happened to it? There is so much going on with that website, its like an ADD persons wet dream. Its so busy I thought I was going to ahve a seizure looking at it. Blaugh. :wacko