***NO trolling or flaming intended. Just my opinion take it as such.***
As someone who does machine work on the side I will point out the problem and why you got the $900 quote. The $900 was a politically correct middle finger. To make sure you never come back to that shop.
You do not have dimensions anywhere on your rendering.
Actually, the image I sent to that shop had measurements
everywhere. It was a much simpler design with only 4 slanted angles (one under the emitter, two in the choke, and one at the very end of the pommel). The rest of the angles were perpendicular to the hilt. I even used several zoomed-in views to show all the measurements of the thin grooves.
I was as polite and neutral as possible in my message to them. I even told them I was open to discussion. Their very first reply said it would cost $900. If they were giving me a "politically correct middle finger", then they're just hostile to anyone who isn't a professional engineer.
Also, when I said "machinist" in the opening comment of this thread, I don't strictly mean "a professional machinist". My use of the term means "anyone with the confidence, experience, and tools, and photos of their work." It's meant to encompass professional machinists as well as hobbyists.
There are 2 reasons the current drawings do not contain measurements.
1. I actually tried to take all the measurements, but the margin of error was getting worse and worse each time I took another measurement. By the time I stopped, about a centimeter had beed added to the hilt in terms of written numbers. The thickness of the tiny black marks on the ruler was actually affecting the measurements. If I had continued all the way through the entire hilt, the written measurements would have added up a whole new inch. The unacceptable margin of error was probably present in the old design that had many measurements, but I never added them up to verify. It only occurred to me to verify the measurements when I drew the new design, which was long after I got the $900 quote for the old design.
2. I'm preferably looking to commission the hilt from someone who has experience making lightsaber hilts. Most of these artists preface their commission pages with disclaimers such as
"I can't guarantee the finished product will be 100% accurate to your design. Please keep in mind I do this for the passion, and I need be able to interpret the details."
I am completely fine with the conditions of those disclaimers. I don't need every minute detail adhered to with absolute precision. Therefore, there is little need to provide a measurement for every single detail - if I presented every detail to the artist, they would turn me away as being too picky. In fact, that's almost exactly what happened when I commissioned this
http://i.imgur.com/QyTNbiC.png He sent me a progress photo which showed that he had cut 7 grip rings that took the space of the intended 8 rings, which are shown in my design. So I sent him this image
http://i.imgur.com/rNFgQEo.jpg I was completely polite and professional in my wording in the message. I even told him the thickness issue of the emitter was not important, and that I only pointed it out to understand why it came out as thick as it did. The 7 rings, rather than 8, made less sense to me, but I was still polite. He responded by saying he would have never accepted my commission if he knew I was so picky and wanted everything exact.
There are 2 measurements that I want the artist to adhere to with a margin of error of 3 millimeters (that is: 1.5 millimeters too large/long is okay, and 1.5 millimeters too small/short is also okay). I know lathing is a slow process, so my understanding is that most errors are easy to anticipate and therefore avoid.
The 2 measurements are:
- The width of the inner hollow should be 0.75 inch. (margin of error 1.5 millimeters up or down)
- The widest part of the hilt, other than the emitter, should be 1 and 3/8 inches in diameter. (margin of error 1.5 millimeters up or down)
The margin of error for the other details is very open, with the exception of the screw holes, which the artist/machinist is likely to realize on their own because screws won't work if the holes aren't made correctly.
I don't like telling anyone how to do their work, but there is a simple way to transfer/derive the measurements from my drawing onto the aluminum stock. The artist/machinist can scale my drawing to 10 inches in length, print that on a sheet of paper, hold the printout against the aluminum stock as if the paper were a ruler, then mark the grooves onto the aluminum with a Sharpie. The depth and width of the cuts is at the discretion of the artist/machinist, hopefully with the intention to get the details visually right by eye.
Most sabersmiths (as opposed to standard machinists) are used to working out the dimensions of a customer's blueprints themselves. Often all we get is a crude hand drawing or a crude workup in MS Paint.
Are sabersmiths, as you call them, more interested in the written measurements, or in the visually marked details? Because if a sabersmith relies more on the visually marked details, then everything is already provided with a high degree of accuracy in this drawing:
http://i.imgur.com/asR4pMI.png
and an even higher degree of accuracy in this over-sized view:
http://i.imgur.com/6b9qgJh.png
EDIT: This is the design that was quoted at $900 by the local professional machine shop. Although the diagram I supplied them did not have the black sections. I no longer have the file with the measurements because it became obsolete. This picture is obsolete too, but it happened to still be on my computer.
A comparison for posterity:
Paint is just about the only thing I can do for my own lightsaber, so I created these images as a guide.