Awful film.
* Skarsgard's performance was weak. I never bought him as a man who was raised in the jungle by apes. (He could learn a lot from Christopher Lambert.)
* Margot Robbie, although an exquisite beauty, is a dreadful actress. Absolutely dreadful.
* Christoph Waltz was incredibly ordinary. With his impotent performance as a Bond villain, that's two recent clunkers for him. I may have to re-consider my admiration for him as an actor.
* Samuel L. Jackson played himself in a 19th-century period piece. 'Nuff said.
* The new story was lame.
* The CGI was inconsistent.
The only thing I liked about it was the relationship between Tarzan and his simian brother that the film only briefly explored.
Other than that, this Tarzan picture was pure garbage. Not worth the time or money I gave it. I'll take Christopher Lambert, in Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan, Lord of the Apes--a far superior film in every respect.
The Wook