Throw out the whole story then maybe.
Solar man? From SupsDNA? Please!!!
I think that would have been a little better movie just by having reeves play Evil and not having those sabertooth clawnails.Rosenthal has also described the final film as Cannon stabbing Christopher Reeve in the back. He also revealed on the Deluxe Edition DVD that he and writer Lawrence Konner wanted Reeve to play Nuclear Man as well as his dual roles of Superman and Clark Kent in the film as they imagined the villain being a darker version of the hero in the cloning process. This would be financially expensive and was already explored in minor detail in Superman III so Cannon decided to hire Mark Pillow instead for the part of Nuclear Man in the final film.
Wait a minute...you were watching this movie...voluntarily?!!! I had heard somewhere that the Gov, uses this as a form of torture to get people to talk.
The fact that we had already seen that double role in Superman III would have made it corny to have to go through that again in IV.
Hey!! I survived "Manos: Hands of fate "so Superman 4 is like a masterpiece compared to that movie.
No, corny compared to how stupid what they actually went for turned out to be.You mean the movie could have been "worse" if they rehashed the "evil twin" thing again?
Is that humanly possible? :lol
Kevin
If you watch the Deleted Scenes for Superman 4... there was another Nuclear Man who was more like Bizarro, but it was more goofy than serious!