Don't get snarky. No we can't totally predict behavior, but they are actual words that have actual definitions.Ah yes, because we can definitely predict the behavior of a psychopathic individual with antisocial personality disorders, amongst other things, can't we...
We aren't actors here (well most probably) but it's quite easy to see how unnerving things like that might be on set, and they're creating art. I think he's created a unique approach to bring the production together - even if people get pissed off/worried with it - that's kind of the point? You don't just want to be laughing along with the joker. He should be legitimately terrifying/unpredictable. If that translates some of those feelings to the screen (which a chunk of the cast has alluded to) then fair play. It's just different. In an office setting, in an engineering company? Definitely not. It's unprofessional and wouldn't make sense. In theatre/acting? It's out there, but it's probably the only place you can get away with that sort of thing.
Claiming "the wrong character" before even seeing the film, about a character that has a multiple choice origin and many, many interesting and varied facets...and taking into account you don't know this specific character yet, his motivations, his goals in the film etc. Give things a chance to stand before tearing it down.
Screw all of that. Mark Hamill is the guy to top.
Now...after you see it, MAYBE then you can say "It's better than the pile of crap we saw before it came out! Give it a chance" and we'll think "Maybe he's right, I just saw a couple minutes, maybe it stands up on longer viewing" but for now..you haven't seen it either! You're also making a judgment based on a trailer WHILE chastising others for doing just that!
you're also free to like whatever you want to like and express it however you want to express it. that's the great thing about free will ;o).
these days it's easier to just ignore whatever I don't agree with ;o).
Aww don't say that! Easier, but less fun. I enjoy the arguments here.
I've said before and will say again: if I anger anyone say so, I will stop, I promise. And apologize. I'm here for fun discussion, not hurt feelings.
I actually agree with this. I like Ledger's version, but not as an adaptation of the Joker, more as a weird Alternate universe Nolan version where everything is different and twisted. Ledger was creepy and awesome and stuff, but nowhere near the real Joker. Honestly, I think that Aaron Eckhart's portrayal of Harvey Dent blew Ledger out of the water. His story was deep, tragic and well thought out. His motivation made sense in the context of the story and with what happened to him. It was close enough to Comic accurate to be accepted as actually being Two-Face. I honestly think that other than his ridiculous visual design, Jared Leto's version will be more Comic accurate than we've ever seen. If the small aspects of the design that don't match the real Joker (metal teeth, tattoos, weird pimp clothes) were scrapped, he would even look better than Ledger's Joker.If Ledger hadn't died, would anyone have cared about his take?
that last sentence is how I Feel about Ledgers joker. it was NOTHING like how I picture the 'real' joker. the only scene that felt like the 'real' joker was where he's walking away in a nurses outfit and waits for the hospital explosion. The rest, he was just some random lunatic screaming and yelling intensely.
for me, Nicholson was a pretty good live action modern joker. Mark Hamil was the ONLY animated joker.
so far, all i've seen of this leto version...when I can stand to look at the ugliness....i'm not buying it.
Don't get snarky. No we can't totally predict behavior, but they are actual words that have actual definitions.
This is completely beside the point. In fact not even loosely related to what I was saying. But since you brought it up: No. I'm not an actor, but I am involved with the theater and movie world...I have degrees in both theater and animation, plus 20 years experience between them. In fact, it's not fair play. Also I don't know how many engineers you know, but those guys are nuts.
It IS something you get away with if it would cost the company millions of dollars to chastise you...so, if you're Jared Leto...or the CEO of multimillion dollar client of said engineering firm...yes, out there but doable. For everyone else trying to do their jobs? It will get you fired and probably in some cases sued. This isn't an "Actors are weird" thing...it's a "Rich powerful people get to do things the rest of us would be arrested for" thing.
Still beside the point: I have no opinion on such antics in general.
And here's where you fall off the cliff. That's what a trailer IS...to make someone WANT to see more. That's the entire reason for it's existence: so that we'll give it a chance. And a trailer is WAAAAAAAAAAAY easier to make than a feature by the way. In this case, I looked at the trailer and said "Nah"...now you, apparently...it HAS worked on. Great! Go see it, I'm sure you'll like it, since you're going in set on liking it. Be sure to tell me about it afterwards. I WILL read what you write, I promise.
For now, we both saw something and we BOTH passed some sort of judgement on it. It was intended to make us want more. It didn't work on me. It's a binary question...yes going to see the movie, or no not. Neither existential, nor philosophical, and deciding "not" is not some sort of character flaw. It's just a decision not to pay for more of something I didn't care for the taste of.
Now...after you see it, MAYBE then you can say "It's better than the pile of crap we saw before it came out! Give it a chance" and we'll think "Maybe he's right, I just saw a couple minutes, maybe it stands up on longer viewing" but for now..you haven't seen it either! You're also making a judgment based on a trailer WHILE chastising others for doing just that!
I especially love the new breed of internet poster that says 'wait till the trailer comes out to judge!' Then when said trailer comes out, the excuse changes too 'Wait till the movie comes out!'
honestly...trying to talk logically online these days makes migrane doctors happy ;o). Although I think for some of these people, deep down they KNOW it's crap, but they can't bring themselves to admit it. the rest are just super fans who'll like anything regardless of quality. all my opinion of course, you are free to agree or dissagree ;o).
you're also free to like whatever you want to like and express it however you want to express it. that's the great thing about free will ;o).
these days it's easier to just ignore whatever I don't agree with ;o).
Mark Hamil was the ONLY animated joker.
I was indeed being a bit of a hypocrite. Get too caught up in defending something - just trying to come from a place of positivity is all!
Mark hamill is indeed the best when it comes to being the joker in animated versions but troy baker is def a worthy successor and not mentioned enough. The monologue starts at 1:20 whoch shows just how good he is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCjJM2oo3EU
As for Leto not gonna go into a debat with that since i like it and to each their own opinion
Haha. Whilst I won't rise to being the "new breed", I haven't said any of that about the "wait for trailer, no wait for film" - my opinion so far has been pretty positive throughout the entire ad campaign, it has me on the hook - I think the only thing that I am not particularly happy about is Katana - whilst she looks good, I just don't get any sense that she will play much of a role - same with Slipknot. I'm happy to be proven wrong.
I only said not to tear something down, and that's because I think it's far, far easier to be negative about something, rather than allow ourselves to be positive about it - by taking our time, judging something properly and logically. Or even neutral. I don't even think neutral exists anymore, which is a real shame, because you can really only judge something truthfully if you're objective, but being objective pretty much precludes hating or loving something I think. Not impossible, but certainly not easy.
I have broken down many moments within what I class as my favourite films or TV shows and am totally happy to say that they arent good enough, or could have been improved by x y and z. But I try to ensure that I've taken the time to fully appreciate what has been shown to me first. And if I can get further enjoyment from a film by discussing it, analysing it etc then all the better for it. I don't always want a 2 hour wham and done. I want some meat to chew.
Afterall, I'd much rather ensure that I have the best chance of enjoying something, than feel disgruntled and hate something on a whim. Understanding more and more about the film process, storytelling and other stuff I've been learning about lately has improved my enjoyment of many things no end lately.
What are some of your favorite movies and TV shows?
I was trying to be nice and non critical....people think I don't give compliments ;o)...
Agree with that 100% ;o)
Definitely one of the best, he was a perfect balance of insane, menacing, funny and deadly. His scenes were among the best in all of Gotham so far. I desperately wanted to see him in Joker make up haha!I gotta say, I think the dude that was "kind of" the Joker in Gotham was be best interpretation I have ever seen.
Snikt, you know Fawbish already likes BVS so you probably shouldn't get to surprised that he's already jumped on the wagon for Suicide Squad.
Sad that DC/WB has so many people second guessing these films, they should be easy sells. However, this latest trailer is an improvement, and Leto's acting may redeem the design somewhat.
I'm still not sure I want to see BVS, $7.00 ticket now and I'm apprehensive about this Suicide Squad.
And let's not pretend that this "method" acting requires such extreme dedication. Wasn't this part of the reason Ledger is gone? Also, Leto's antics are just outright disgusting. Not too different from Die Antwoord's antics on Chappie, but seriously, that Davis lady in charge of them wasn't having that ****.