Star Trek Tridimensional Chess Set

I’m clueless… but it looks like they didn’t even use the same pieces in TOS if you compare the yellow uniform Spock picture with the blue uniform ones.

I’m not surprised they changed. Most of the phaser, communicator, tricorder… props up close weren’t exactly the same to each other either. I am intrigued by the variations across the various series.

I doubt there was ONE holy grail piece. I would just assume their replicators had some variation in models.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5697.jpeg
    IMG_5697.jpeg
    387.3 KB · Views: 87
  • IMG_6358.jpeg
    IMG_6358.jpeg
    16.6 KB · Views: 78
  • IMG_6359.jpeg
    IMG_6359.jpeg
    257.5 KB · Views: 75
  • IMG_6357.jpeg
    IMG_6357.jpeg
    22.3 KB · Views: 68
  • IMG_6352.jpeg
    IMG_6352.jpeg
    29.5 KB · Views: 118
  • IMG_6353.jpeg
    IMG_6353.jpeg
    22.8 KB · Views: 72
  • IMG_5703.jpeg
    IMG_5703.jpeg
    116.3 KB · Views: 73
  • IMG_6356.jpeg
    IMG_6356.jpeg
    72.8 KB · Views: 72
  • IMG_6354.jpeg
    IMG_6354.jpeg
    109 KB · Views: 80
  • IMG_6360.jpeg
    IMG_6360.jpeg
    54.9 KB · Views: 64
  • IMG_5696.jpeg
    IMG_5696.jpeg
    59.5 KB · Views: 80
I’m clueless… but it looks like they didn’t even use the same pieces in TOS if you compare the yellow uniform Spock picture with the blue uniform ones.

I’m not surprised they changed. Most of the phaser, communicator, tricorder… props up close weren’t exactly the same to each other either. I am intrigued by the variations across the various series.

I doubt there was ONE holy grail piece. I would just assume their replicators had some variation in models.
Yes there does seem to be an earlier set of chessmen used in an earlier pilot. TNG had its own unique tridimensional board thats been explored in another thread, but the production team seems to have thrown out all conventions when it came to designing the chessmen. I cant make heads or tails of what piece is what in the data vs troy game. It seems that they just threw in a bunch of easter eggs. one of the pieces seems inspired by the lost in space robot for example. I didnt know it untill you poibnted out but it looks like also on TNG is a varient of tridimensional chess that is closer in concept to the Space Chess made by Pleasentime games than it is to the TOS concept or even the earlier tng concept. It isnt of course the exact space chess game since it looks like this one has been made entirely of clear acrtylic but its the same general idea and might follow similar rules.

 
I just threw this base model together in google sketchup. I traced the profile from a screenshot of charlie x and scaled based upon my pixel measurements. I cant guarantee its exact but it might be close. I'll have to revise it once i figure out how to attach it to the frame. Im not happy with how facited it is and I dont know how to prep the model for cnc lathe turning yet. any info would be much appreciated

edit july 21: I have contacted customer support at xometry and put in for a quote at a metal spin forming company. I'll let you all know when I get more info. I may need to do a run of these.
 

Attachments

  • TridimensionalChessBase.stl
    288.1 KB · Views: 76
  • Screen Shot 2024-07-20 at 5.28.04 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2024-07-20 at 5.28.04 PM.png
    88.9 KB · Views: 50
  • Screen Shot 2024-07-21 at 8.12.30 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2024-07-21 at 8.12.30 AM.png
    51 KB · Views: 40
  • charlie-x.svg.zip
    1.1 KB · Views: 62
Last edited:
I'm coming a bit late to this thread, but I may have some helpful information. Some years ago, we did a fairly exhaustive analysis of the original Chess Prop on another forum, one which has since gone dark and all of its content lost. (Don't ever think "the internet is forever," cuz it sure ain't.) I can't reconjure the full discussion thread and all its details, but I'll try to summarize key findings, with a few images I happen to have saved.

We started with measurements of existing "found items" matching the screen-used prop: Pleasantime Space Checkers, Checkline Tic-Tac-Toe, and both Ganine Classic and Ganine Gothic chess piece sets. We could then accurately scale and take additional measurement estimates from copious episode framegrabs and as many publicity photos as we could find, some of which showed previously-mysterious details in surprising clarity.

The original Chess Prop was thrown together in a rush for the second pilot, and manhandled over the years. It mostly sported four small boards, but premiered with five, and showed up once with six. The horizontal positions of its main boards never aligned its squares above-and-below each other on its best days, and its main boards were often shown turned at odd angles as well. Its outer curved arm was bent at a very different angle in later episodes versus early episodes. And the vertical spacing of its boards was never sufficient for its chess pieces.

Raw materials:
  • The chess pieces used in Where No Man were never reused, and were likely somebody's personal set, apparently handcarved and quite tall. The chess pieces used throughout all three seasons alternated between Ganine Classic and Ganine Gothic.
  • The main boards from the Checkline game are 8"x8", with effectively 2" squares. They are molded completely clear, flat on their underside, and with slightly raised lines separating their squares on their topside to more easily hold their tokens during play. Their pins are centered about 3/8" inset from their edges and molded hollow, squared and open above, rounded and closed below.
  • The Checkline game comes with 3" vertical spacers to hold its boards apart. Early production runs used clear tubes. Later runs used opaque tubes or solid struts with tubelike ends.
  • The small boards from the Pleasantime game are 3"x3", with effective 1-1/2" squares. They are molded with clear plastic but have a fine pebbly texture on the tops of two of its four squares, making them appear whitish. They also have a "split collar" underneath the center of each board, to friction-fit onto the Pleasantime vertical spacer tubes. Later production runs used all red boards.
  • The Checkline spacer tubes and Pleasantime spacer tubes are not compatible. The Pleasantime tubes have both a thicker outer diameter than the Checkline tubes, and a smaller inner diameter than the Checkline tubes, so they won't fit onto the Checkline pins.
  • The Chess Prop's curved arms appear to have been made from 3/8" square solid rod stock, most likely aluminum. We believe the curved arms were not a found item, but bent and cut just for this prop.
  • The Chess Prop's base is about 9" in diameter, and about 3" tall. We believe it was a found item of the day, maybe a globe base, a plant stand, a lamp base, a chandelier ceiling mount, or something else, but we never found an exact match for it.

Assembled into the Chess Prop:
  • The Chess Prop painted its main Checkline boards' alternating squares red, between its raised lines, with a transparent red paint. One square of each board has a Checkline logo molded into it; on The Chess Prop, those logo squares are painted red.
  • The Chess Prop mounted its main Checkline boards by drilling a hole through the center of the board and using a single screw to attach it to its arm. Our best guess is a #8 slotted pan head sheet metal screw.
  • The Chess Prop mounted its main Checkline boards upside-down, to place its raised lines on the underside and leave the topside smooth. The pins are another tell (round end up), and the inverted (painted) logo is also visible in one Charlie X shot.
  • The Chess Prop did not need to paint its small Pleasantime boards, as they came already molded with textured alternating squares.
  • The Pleasantime tubes don't fit onto the pins of the main Checkline boards. The Chess Prop used the 3" Checkline clear tubes to hold up its smaller boards, with a bit of clear tape around the top of each tube to give the small Pleasantime boards a snug fit.
  • The apparently complex shape of each curved arm seems to be a collection of piecewise circular arcs. We believe square rod stock was manually shaped with a three-roller bender.
  • At each point where a board is attached to a curved arm, the arm flares out to better support the board, with a hole drilled through it to take the screw holding the board. We were unable to determine how these flares were made, but the drilled hole is visible from beneath in some images.
  • The two curved arms are attached to one another with two sets of nuts and bolts. Our best guess is 1/4" slotted round head machine bolts and matching 1/4" hex nuts.
  • The join of the outer curved arm to the base appears seamless. Rather than being welded, our guess is that the outer arm was drilled into and tapped, and a bolt threaded into it through the base from below.

Some replica fabrication tips:
  • Ganine Classic (honeydripper) chess piece sets are almost impossible to find these days, but Ganine Gothic (face) sets are still readily and affordably available on eBay, and are equally screen-accurate. Make sure you get the Salon (standard) size, with a 3-3/8" King, and not the Tournament (taller) size with a 4-1/2" King that shows up occasionally.
  • Exactly how screen-accurate do you want to be? Ganine 3-3/8" Kings won't fit under the small boards if you use 3" spacers. I wanted my prop to be fully playable, so before bending my support arms I drew up "idealized" plans with slightly modified vertical spacing, just enough to ensure my Ganine King would fit everywhere, with my main boards 7" apart and the small boards in the middle at 3-1/2". This required using 3-1/2" spacers. I used the thicker Pleasantime tubes and carefully widened their bottom openings to fit the Checkline pins, delicate work and easy to screw up.
  • Some replicas further adjust the horizontal positions of their main boards to align their squares vertically above/below each other. I chose to not do this, keeping my horizontal positions "jaunty" as on the original.
  • Note that even with the main boards' pin centers being inset 3/8" from the edges, the 1-1/2" squares on the small boards means they don't overhang further than a single 2" square on the main board. Many replicas don't get this right, using 2" squares throughout, leading to different overall proportions and a somewhat crowded look to its oversized small boards.
  • Each curved arm is not single circular arc! Replicas that do this produce an outer arm that swings out well beyond the top main board, making the whole prop want to tip over easily unless you put extra weight in the base.
  • Whatever you decide for your board positions or curved arm shapes, draw up your plans and print them at 1:1 scale to use as a target reference when bending up your rod stock for your arms.
  • To paint the red squares on the main boards, we experimented with many different paints and found Testor's "Candy Apple Transparent Red" to work well. Masking-tape the hell out of the rest of your board, give it one or two gentle coats, then peel the tape and you should be good.
  • To paint the squares on your small boards, you might want to experiment with something that would make a clear pebbly texture, or try a "frosted" craft paint.
  • To bend aluminum square rod stock into the desired shapes, we've had good success using a manual three-roller bender, tweaking the shape until it was close enough to our target, then cutting the ends.
  • Before making the final cut of my inner curved arm, I added one final "upward" bend right at the cut point, rather than grinding it down after cutting. I didn't do this with the bender, but just heated up the spot until I could bend it there by hand. But I did make a wooden rig to hold the curved arms while I made the final cuts, to ensure they stayed aligned and square.
  • To make the flares where the arms support the boards, some replica makers have spoken with professional welders. I made mine by using thick fender washers, and attaching them to the already-bent-and-cut arms with a two-part aluminum putty/epoxy like J-B Weld.
  • For your base, some replica makers have had them lathed out of solid aluminum. I made mine with a 9" aluminum cooking pot lid, a 6" lid, and a 3" diameter hand bell, with heavy wood inside the lids to give it weight, and a felt bottom.

Please post pics of your work-in-progress, if you can. I'd love to see them!
 

Attachments

  • 55g.gif
    55g.gif
    435.9 KB · Views: 88
  • 55j.gif
    55j.gif
    417.8 KB · Views: 78
  • 55p3.gif
    55p3.gif
    420.9 KB · Views: 80
  • 55p4.gif
    55p4.gif
    509.6 KB · Views: 77
  • idealized_arm_bends.png
    idealized_arm_bends.png
    35.3 KB · Views: 76
Last edited:
I'm coming a bit late to this thread, but I may have some helpful information. Some years ago, we did a fairly exhaustive analysis of the original Chess Prop on another forum, one which has since gone dark and all of its content lost. (Don't ever think "the internet is forever," cuz it sure ain't.) I can't reconjure the full discussion thread and all its details, but I'll try to summarize key findings, with a few images I happen to have saved.

We started with measurements of existing "found items" matching the screen-used prop: Pleasantime Space Checkers, Checkline Tic-Tac-Toe, and both Ganine Classic and Ganine Gothic chess piece sets. We could then accurately scale and take additional measurement estimates from copious episode framegrabs and as many publicity photos as we could find, some of which showed previously-mysterious details in surprising clarity.

The original Chess Prop was thrown together in a rush for the second pilot, and manhandled over the years. It mostly sported four small boards, but premiered with five, and showed up once with six. The horizontal positions of its main boards never aligned its squares above-and-below each other on its best days, and its main boards were often shown turned at odd angles as well. Its outer curved arm was bent at a very different angle in later episodes versus early episodes. And the vertical spacing of its boards was never sufficient for its chess pieces.

Raw materials:
  • The chess pieces used in Where No Man were never reused, and were likely somebody's personal set, apparently handcarved and quite tall. The chess pieces used throughout all three seasons alternated between Ganine Classic and Ganine Gothic.
  • The main boards from the Checkline game are 8"x8", with effectively 2" squares. They are molded completely clear, flat on their underside, and with slightly raised lines separating their squares on their topside to more easily hold their tokens during play. Their pins are centered about 3/8" inset from their edges and molded hollow, squared and open above, rounded and closed below.
  • The Checkline game comes with 3" vertical spacers to hold its boards apart. Early production runs used clear tubes. Later runs used opaque tubes or solid struts with tubelike ends.
  • The small boards from the Pleasantime game are 3"x3", with effective 1-1/2" squares. They are molded with clear plastic but have a fine pebbly texture on the tops of two of its four squares, making them appear whitish. They also have a "split collar" underneath the center of each board, to friction-fit onto the Pleasantime vertical spacer tubes. Later production runs used all red boards.
  • The Checkline spacer tubes and Pleasantime spacer tubes are not compatible. The Pleasantime tubes have both a thicker outer diameter than the Checkline tubes, and a smaller inner diameter than the Checkline tubes, so they won't fit onto the Checkline pins.
  • The Chess Prop's curved arms appear to made from 3/8" square solid rod stock, most likely aluminum. We believe the curved arms were not a found item, but bent and cut just for this prop.
  • The Chess Prop's base is about 9" in diameter, and about 3" tall. We believe it was a found item of the day, maybe a globe base, a plant stand, a lamp base, a chandelier ceiling mount, or something else, but we never found an exact match for it.

Assembled into the Chess Prop:
  • The Chess Prop painted its main Checkline boards' alternating squares red, between its raised lines, with a transparent red paint. One square of each board has a Checkline logo molded into it; on The Chess Prop, those logo squares are painted red.
  • The Chess Prop mounted its main Checkline boards by drilling a hole through the center of the board and using a single screw to attach it to its arm. Our best guess is a #8 slotted pan head sheet metal screw.
  • The Chess Prop mounted its main Checkline boards upside-down, to place its raised lines on the underside and leave the topside smooth. The pins are another tell (round end up), and the inverted (painted) logo is also visible in one Charlie X shot.
  • The Chess Prop did not need to paint its small Pleasantime boards, as they came already molded with textured alternating squares.
  • The Pleasantime tubes don't fit onto the pins of the main Checkline boards. The Chess Prop used the 3" Checkline clear tubes to hold up its smaller boards, with a bit of clear tape around the top of each tube to give the small Pleasantime boards a snug fit.
  • The apparently complex shape of each curved arm seems to be a collection of piecewise circular arcs. We believe square rod stock was manually shaped with a three-roller bender.
  • At each point where a board is attached to a curved arm, the arm flares out to better support the board, with a hole drilled through it to take the screw holding the board. We were unable to determine how these flares were made, but the drilled hole is visible from beneath in some images.
  • The two curved arms are attached to one another with two sets of nuts and bolts. Our best guess is 1/4" slotted round head machine bolts and matching 1/4" hex nuts.
  • The join of the outer curved arm to the base appears seamless. Rather than being welded, our guess is that the outer arm was drilled into and tapped, and a bolt threaded into it through the base from below.

Some replica fabrication tips:
  • Ganine Classic (honeydripper) chess piece sets are almost impossible to find these days, but Ganine Gothic (face) sets are still readily and affordably available on eBay, and are equally screen-accurate. Make sure you get the Salon (standard) size, with a 3-3/8" King, and not the Tournament (taller) size with a 4-1/2" King that shows up occasionally.
  • Exactly how screen-accurate do you want to be? Ganine 3-3/8" Kings won't fit under the small boards if you use 3" spacers. I wanted my prop to be fully playable, so before bending my support arms I drew up "idealized" plans that adjusted all vertical spacing to ensure my Ganine King would fit everywhere, with my main boards 7" apart and the small boards in the middle at 3-1/2". This required using 3-1/2" spacers. I used the thicker Pleasantime tubes and carefully widened their bottom openings to fit the Checkline pins, delicate work and easy to screw up.
  • Some replicas further adjust the horizontal positions of their main boards to align their squares vertically above/below each other. I chose to keep my horizontal positions "jaunty".
  • Note that even with the main boards' pin centers being inset 3/8" from the edges, the 1-1/2" squares on the small boards means they don't overhang further than a single 2" square on the main board. Many replicas don't get this right, using 2" squares throughout, leading to different overall proportions and a somewhat crowded look to its small boards.
  • Each curved arm is not single circular arc! Replicas that do this produce an outer arm that swings out well beyond the top main board, making the whole prop want to tip over easily unless you put extra weight in the base.
  • Whatever you decide for your board positions or curved arm shapes, draw up your plans and print them at 1:1 scale to use as a target reference when bending up your rod stock for your arms.
  • To paint the red squares on the main boards, we experimented with many different paints and found Testor's "Candy Apple Transparent Red" to work well. Masking-tape the hell out of the rest of your board, give it one or two gentle coats, then peel the tape and you should be good.
  • To paint the squares on your small boards, you might want to experiment with something that would make a clear pebbly texture, or try a "frosted" craft paint.
  • To bend aluminum square rod stock into the desired shapes, we've had good success with the same process using a manual three-roller bender, tweaking the shape until it was close enough to our target then cutting the ends.
  • Before making the final cut of my inner curved arm, I added one final "upward" bend right at the cut point, rather than grinding it down after cutting. I didn't do this with the bender, but just heated up the spot until I could bend it by hand. But I did make a wooden rig to hold the curved arms while I made the final cuts, to ensure they stayed square.
  • To make the flares where the arms support the boards, some replica makers have spoken with professional welders. I made mine by using thick fender washers, and attaching them to the already-bent-and-cut arms with two-part aluminum putty/epoxy like J-B Weld.
  • For your base, some replica makers have had them lathed out of solid aluminum. I made mine with a 9" aluminum cooking pot lid, a 6" lid, and a 3" diameter hand bell, with heavy wood inside the lids to give it heft, and a felt bottom.

Please post pics of your work-in-progress, if you can. I'd love to see them!
WOW awesome information! Wonderful and thanks so much as this helps to move the ball forward.
 
Wish I coulda just posted a link to the original thread, it was awesome. But that's how the internet goes sometimes. :-(

Here's a bonus pic, with the Technical Manual drawing scaled up to 2" squares against the same background. I can't really blame Franz Joseph, his work was a joy back in the day, and we older fans still hold it in nostalgic fondness to the puzzlement of younger fen. But it was a product of its era, one artist's interpretation, made without modern tools and references.

Although it still tickles me that his invented chess piece designs got picked up and turned into physical pieces by Franklin Mint. (There's an epic soap opera behind other parts of that first Franklin Mint set, but that's a whole 'nother story.)
 

Attachments

  • 55e.gif
    55e.gif
    416.7 KB · Views: 63
No response from the metal spinning company. Xometry said that they can't accept an STL for CMC lathe work and that I need to get it made up in CAD for CNC machining.
I'm coming a bit late to this thread, but I may have some helpful information. Some years ago, we did a fairly exhaustive analysis of the original Chess Prop on another forum, one which has since gone dark and all of its content lost. (Don't ever think "the internet is forever," cuz it sure ain't.) I can't reconjure the full discussion thread and all its details, but I'll try to summarize key findings, with a few images I happen to have saved.

We started with measurements of existing "found items" matching the screen-used prop: Pleasantime Space Checkers, Checkline Tic-Tac-Toe, and both Ganine Classic and Ganine Gothic chess piece sets. We could then accurately scale and take additional measurement estimates from copious episode framegrabs and as many publicity photos as we could find, some of which showed previously-mysterious details in surprising clarity.

The original Chess Prop was thrown together in a rush for the second pilot, and manhandled over the years. It mostly sported four small boards, but premiered with five, and showed up once with six. The horizontal positions of its main boards never aligned its squares above-and-below each other on its best days, and its main boards were often shown turned at odd angles as well. Its outer curved arm was bent at a very different angle in later episodes versus early episodes. And the vertical spacing of its boards was never sufficient for its chess pieces.

Raw materials:
  • The chess pieces used in Where No Man were never reused, and were likely somebody's personal set, apparently handcarved and quite tall. The chess pieces used throughout all three seasons alternated between Ganine Classic and Ganine Gothic.
  • The main boards from the Checkline game are 8"x8", with effectively 2" squares. They are molded completely clear, flat on their underside, and with slightly raised lines separating their squares on their topside to more easily hold their tokens during play. Their pins are centered about 3/8" inset from their edges and molded hollow, squared and open above, rounded and closed below.
  • The Checkline game comes with 3" vertical spacers to hold its boards apart. Early production runs used clear tubes. Later runs used opaque tubes or solid struts with tubelike ends.
  • The small boards from the Pleasantime game are 3"x3", with effective 1-1/2" squares. They are molded with clear plastic but have a fine pebbly texture on the tops of two of its four squares, making them appear whitish. They also have a "split collar" underneath the center of each board, to friction-fit onto the Pleasantime vertical spacer tubes. Later production runs used all red boards.
  • The Checkline spacer tubes and Pleasantime spacer tubes are not compatible. The Pleasantime tubes have both a thicker outer diameter than the Checkline tubes, and a smaller inner diameter than the Checkline tubes, so they won't fit onto the Checkline pins.
  • The Chess Prop's curved arms appear to made from 3/8" square solid rod stock, most likely aluminum. We believe the curved arms were not a found item, but bent and cut just for this prop.
  • The Chess Prop's base is about 9" in diameter, and about 3" tall. We believe it was a found item of the day, maybe a globe base, a plant stand, a lamp base, a chandelier ceiling mount, or something else, but we never found an exact match for it.

Assembled into the Chess Prop:
  • The Chess Prop painted its main Checkline boards' alternating squares red, between its raised lines, with a transparent red paint. One square of each board has a Checkline logo molded into it; on The Chess Prop, those logo squares are painted red.
  • The Chess Prop mounted its main Checkline boards by drilling a hole through the center of the board and using a single screw to attach it to its arm. Our best guess is a #8 slotted pan head sheet metal screw.
  • The Chess Prop mounted its main Checkline boards upside-down, to place its raised lines on the underside and leave the topside smooth. The pins are another tell (round end up), and the inverted (painted) logo is also visible in one Charlie X shot.
  • The Chess Prop did not need to paint its small Pleasantime boards, as they came already molded with textured alternating squares.
  • The Pleasantime tubes don't fit onto the pins of the main Checkline boards. The Chess Prop used the 3" Checkline clear tubes to hold up its smaller boards, with a bit of clear tape around the top of each tube to give the small Pleasantime boards a snug fit.
  • The apparently complex shape of each curved arm seems to be a collection of piecewise circular arcs. We believe square rod stock was manually shaped with a three-roller bender.
  • At each point where a board is attached to a curved arm, the arm flares out to better support the board, with a hole drilled through it to take the screw holding the board. We were unable to determine how these flares were made, but the drilled hole is visible from beneath in some images.
  • The two curved arms are attached to one another with two sets of nuts and bolts. Our best guess is 1/4" slotted round head machine bolts and matching 1/4" hex nuts.
  • The join of the outer curved arm to the base appears seamless. Rather than being welded, our guess is that the outer arm was drilled into and tapped, and a bolt threaded into it through the base from below.

Some replica fabrication tips:
  • Ganine Classic (honeydripper) chess piece sets are almost impossible to find these days, but Ganine Gothic (face) sets are still readily and affordably available on eBay, and are equally screen-accurate. Make sure you get the Salon (standard) size, with a 3-3/8" King, and not the Tournament (taller) size with a 4-1/2" King that shows up occasionally.
  • Exactly how screen-accurate do you want to be? Ganine 3-3/8" Kings won't fit under the small boards if you use 3" spacers. I wanted my prop to be fully playable, so before bending my support arms I drew up "idealized" plans that adjusted all vertical spacing to ensure my Ganine King would fit everywhere, with my main boards 7" apart and the small boards in the middle at 3-1/2". This required using 3-1/2" spacers. I used the thicker Pleasantime tubes and carefully widened their bottom openings to fit the Checkline pins, delicate work and easy to screw up.
  • Some replicas further adjust the horizontal positions of their main boards to align their squares vertically above/below each other. I chose to keep my horizontal positions "jaunty".
  • Note that even with the main boards' pin centers being inset 3/8" from the edges, the 1-1/2" squares on the small boards means they don't overhang further than a single 2" square on the main board. Many replicas don't get this right, using 2" squares throughout, leading to different overall proportions and a somewhat crowded look to its small boards.
  • Each curved arm is not single circular arc! Replicas that do this produce an outer arm that swings out well beyond the top main board, making the whole prop want to tip over easily unless you put extra weight in the base.
  • Whatever you decide for your board positions or curved arm shapes, draw up your plans and print them at 1:1 scale to use as a target reference when bending up your rod stock for your arms.
  • To paint the red squares on the main boards, we experimented with many different paints and found Testor's "Candy Apple Transparent Red" to work well. Masking-tape the hell out of the rest of your board, give it one or two gentle coats, then peel the tape and you should be good.
  • To paint the squares on your small boards, you might want to experiment with something that would make a clear pebbly texture, or try a "frosted" craft paint.
  • To bend aluminum square rod stock into the desired shapes, we've had good success with the same process using a manual three-roller bender, tweaking the shape until it was close enough to our target then cutting the ends.
  • Before making the final cut of my inner curved arm, I added one final "upward" bend right at the cut point, rather than grinding it down after cutting. I didn't do this with the bender, but just heated up the spot until I could bend it by hand. But I did make a wooden rig to hold the curved arms while I made the final cuts, to ensure they stayed square.
  • To make the flares where the arms support the boards, some replica makers have spoken with professional welders. I made mine by using thick fender washers, and attaching them to the already-bent-and-cut arms with two-part aluminum putty/epoxy like J-B Weld.
  • For your base, some replica makers have had them lathed out of solid aluminum. I made mine with a 9" aluminum cooking pot lid, a 6" lid, and a 3" diameter hand bell, with heavy wood inside the lids to give it heft, and a felt bottom.

Please post pics of your work-in-progress, if you can. I'd love to see them!
So far my work in progress consists of acquiring 3 perfect checkline boards the clear checkline spacers and the orange space checkers boards which I plan the make a silicone mold of and cast duplicates in clear resin. I also have the gothic set in salon size. It's the supurba edition which feels lightly weighed in the base.

I am aiming for screen accuracy in all its misaligned glory including the weird way that the upper middle board isn't exactly centered between the two other boards and that there's less clearance between the bottom of the attack boards and the board below, than the clearance between the attack board and the board above it.

Turning the base is going to be challenging because I don't have access to a lathe which means I'm going to need to have it designed in CAD in such a way that I can send it off to xometry or something to have it made on a CNC lathe.
 
I am aiming for screen accuracy in all its misaligned glory including the weird way that the upper middle board isn't exactly centered between the two other boards and that there's less clearance between the bottom of the attack boards and the board below, than the clearance between the attack board and the board above it.

Turning the base is going to be challenging because I don't have access to a lathe which means I'm going to need to have it designed in CAD in such a way that I can send it off to xometry or something to have it made on a CNC lathe.

For my personal replica, the minor vertical adjustments I made seem almost inconspicuous, tweaking their vertical separations just enough to let a Ganine King fit on any square he wants. But like you, I made the same choice to keep the horizontal positions of the three main boards "jaunty," with the top board leaning in almost a half inch forward of its "aligned" position over the center board, and the bottom board jutting out more than a full inch! To me, replicas with horizontally realigned boards just don't look right, somehow looking stiff and losing some of the charm of the original prop.

As for the base, I couldn't afford to have mine lathed, so I'm fine with my lids-and-handbell for now. Maybe someday I'll upgrade. ;-)

BTW, early in this thread somebody pointed to a trekbbs.com thread from 2012 in which somebody copied (without attribution, sadly) some of the original research text and photos that I and others posted elsewhere during our 2008 analysis, and also pointed to a photo gallery from fellow prop guru Greg Schnitzer. My photos have black backgrounds; Greg Schnitzer liked to use a green cloth. Be wary when studying the trekbbs thread, as it mixes uninformed chatter in with the expert analysis with little to no indication of any sources. And be aware when studying Greg's gallery that many of his photos are of replicas, some his, some others. To the best of our collective knowledge, the original Chess Prop did not survive the end of the series in 1969 and has never been seen since, so episode frames and publicity photos are our only 100% reliable sources.

More bonus pics, this time from my personal build. After I had rod stock bent to my specs, here is how I made a wooden template to hold them while I cut the ends on my table saw, to ensure my cuts stayed perpendicular to the plane of the bends.
 

Attachments

  • DSC00616.JPG
    DSC00616.JPG
    2.2 MB · Views: 59
  • DSC00613.JPG
    DSC00613.JPG
    137.1 KB · Views: 65
  • DSC00612.JPG
    DSC00612.JPG
    135.2 KB · Views: 62
  • DSC00611.JPG
    DSC00611.JPG
    136.5 KB · Views: 62
  • DSC00610.JPG
    DSC00610.JPG
    140.7 KB · Views: 57
  • DSC00609.JPG
    DSC00609.JPG
    140 KB · Views: 53
  • DSC00608.JPG
    DSC00608.JPG
    139 KB · Views: 53
  • DSC00618.JPG
    DSC00618.JPG
    2.3 MB · Views: 57
Last edited:
I have been searching for the pieces used in the second pilot "Where no man has gone before" My research indicate the peices were stone or marble from south of the border. I have seen similar sets on ebay, but never an exact match. They used 2 sets during the series The gothic set still redily available on ebay and the Now infamously hard to unobtainium set. Both Peter Ganine sets. There are STL files available for printing on several websites.
 
I have been searching for the pieces used in the second pilot "Where no man has gone before" My research indicate the peices were stone or marble from south of the border. I have seen similar sets on ebay, but never an exact match. They used 2 sets during the series The gothic set still redily available on ebay and the Now infamously hard to unobtainium set. Both Peter Ganine sets. There are STL files available for printing on several websites.
Yeah, people have been searching for years for an exact match to that Where No Man set, with no luck. Our belief is that the WNM set was hand-carved, and therefore the only way to find an exact match would be to find that exact set. Was it scrounged from a prop warehouse, privately owned by a prop guy, borrowed from a neighbor? Who knows.

And yes, while Ganine Gothic sets are still readily and affordable available on eBay, Ganine Classic sets have sadly become incredibly scarce and grossly overpriced. "3D printed" replicas have a rough texture that undermines their smooth curved design. I once loaned some of my Classic pieces to a fellow propaholic who molded them to make cast replicas available for sale for a little while, but that was years ago. If somebody wants to make new molds, PM me. ;-)
 
Yeah, people have been searching for years for an exact match to that Where No Man set, with no luck. Our belief is that the WNM set was hand-carved, and therefore the only way to find an exact match would be to find that exact set. Was it scrounged from a prop warehouse, privately owned by a prop guy, borrowed from a neighbor? Who knows.

And yes, while Ganine Gothic sets are still readily and affordable available on eBay, Ganine Classic sets have sadly become incredibly scarce and grossly overpriced. "3D printed" replicas have a rough texture that undermines their smooth curved design. I once loaned some of my Classic pieces to a fellow propaholic who molded them to make cast replicas available for sale for a little while, but that was years ago. If somebody wants to make new molds, PM me. ;-)
I don't really have moulding chops yet but we really do need a better 3d printable files set available. The currently available ones have an absolutely horrible looking knight. I managed a 3d scan of some of the pieces and I'm hoping to use it as reference and maybe learn some 3d modelling. I only have a revoscan miraco. It will miss extremely fine details like the makers mark on the side of the base of the pieces.

Side note, I'm practicing blender by modeling the chess pieces described in the technical manual. I used to do things like this in wings3d a lot. I'm a little rusty.
 
Last edited:
Wish I coulda just posted a link to the original thread, it was awesome. But that's how the internet goes sometimes. :-(

Here's a bonus pic, with the Technical Manual drawing scaled up to 2" squares against the same background. I can't really blame Franz Joseph, his work was a joy back in the day, and we older fans still hold it in nostalgic fondness to the puzzlement of younger fen. But it was a product of its era, one artist's interpretation, made without modern tools and references.

Although it still tickles me that his invented chess piece designs got picked up and turned into physical pieces by Franklin Mint. (There's an epic soap opera behind other parts of that first Franklin Mint set, but that's a whole 'nother story.)
I'm teaching myself blender starting with modeling the pieces in the technical manual. There's lots more I want to do of course but so far it's been a good way to get my feet wet. Already did the pawn last night
 
Modelled the Rook, pawn, Bishop and King. Queen should be easy, knight looks intimidating. This is all of course very similar to the Franklin Mint release, but the manual specifies a 3.5" king in black and white instead of gold and silver. Franklin Mint boards I think are scaled down 50%. Pieces might be too
 
Last edited:
Played around with my 3d scanner a bit. I now have very good scans of the king, queen, Bishop, Knight and rook from the Peter Ganine gothic set in salon size. The pawn is proving to be a little bit of a challenge because of its size. I'll post the STL files as soon as I get the pawn ready. I know the real set is very affordable, but it might be useful for reference, and if you print it rather than buy it, you can weight the set to your hearts content.
 
And yes, while Ganine Gothic sets are still readily and affordable available on eBay, Ganine Classic sets have sadly become incredibly scarce and grossly overpriced. "3D printed" replicas have a rough texture that undermines their smooth curved design. I once loaned some of my Classic pieces to a fellow propaholic who molded them to make cast replicas available for sale for a little while, but that was years ago. If somebody wants to make new molds, PM me. ;-)

They are grossly overpriced mostly due to hoarders who find them cheaply by sellers who don't realize the value and then attempt to make a several-fold profit by asking ridiculously high prices. Combine that with Trek fans who simply HAVE TO HAVE ONE NOW. Yes, they are rare, but they are not THAT rare. Same thing is going on with the Space Checkers sets with the clear boards (and plenty of other "found" items).

Capitalism is fine and all, but I try (admittedly don't always succeed) not to enable greedy collectors in their quest to further enrich their own collections. I bided my time and found a reasonably priced Ganine Gothic chess set. Took a while though.
 
They are grossly overpriced mostly due to hoarders who find them cheaply by sellers who don't realize the value and then attempt to make a several-fold profit by asking ridiculously high prices. Combine that with Trek fans who simply HAVE TO HAVE ONE NOW. Yes, they are rare, but they are not THAT rare. Same thing is going on with the Space Checkers sets with the clear boards (and plenty of other "found" items).

Capitalism is fine and all, but I try (admittedly don't always succeed) not to enable greedy collectors in their quest to further enrich their own collections. I bided my time and found a reasonably priced Ganine Gothic chess set. Took a while though.

I'll say it again, the Ganine Gothic (face) sets are plentiful and affordable. I just looked at eBay, and right now there are literally dozens of complete Ganine Gothic sets available, starting around $25.

Sadly the Ganine Classic (honeydripper) sets are long gone. I was lucky enough to get mine back in the earlier days of eBay, when a set would turn up every few weeks and acquiring one just took a little patience and persistence. But in the last ten years I think I've only seen two or three original sets on eBay. Of course when one shows up its price is going to get bid into the stratosphere. They're rare! Same for the clear-board Space Checkers sets, there just simply aren't many of them left.

I'll also say again, some years ago I loaned a few of my Ganine Classic (honeydripper) pieces to someone who molded them, made a small run of really top quality replicas and sold complete sets quite affordably. Screw eBay or 3D printing, -this- is what somebody here should do again. I don't have the necessary molding experience or expertise. But I would eagerly loan out a few pieces to the cause if such a person would step up, to their own benefit as well as to the benefit of other prop fans who want them. Hint hint.
 
Sadly the Ganine Classic (honeydripper) sets are long gone. I was lucky enough to get mine back in the earlier days of eBay, when a set would turn up every few weeks and acquiring one just took a little patience and persistence. But in the last ten years I think I've only seen two or three original sets on eBay. Of course when one shows up its price is going to get bid into the stratosphere. They're rare! Same for the clear-board Space Checkers sets, there just simply aren't many of them left.

One just (July 29) sold on Ebay for $510. Came with the original box, but not the original board. Not exactly cheap, but not stratospheric either. Seller used "Star Trek" in the auction title. At that price, the buyer may well have bought for their collection as opposed to trying to flip for profit. We'll see soon enough if one in Georgia comes up for sale shortly for twice as much. ;) But from what I have seen in the past couple years, the realized selling prices have come down quite a bit. The ecomony, perhaps.

The timing is not a coincidence. They can and do still come up for sale.
 
The timing is not a coincidence. They can and do still come up for sale.

Looking up that auction you mentioned, it seems the seller had a listing for $125 that said "Classic By Peter G A N I N E 1961 With Maple And Walnut Chess Board See Photos" and closed on Jun 22 with no bids, then relisted it as "Chess Set from Star Trek 1961-Ganine-Maple And Walnut Chess Board See Photos" to sell on Jun 29 for $510 with 7 bids.

For years now I've mostly just watched from the sidelines. When I was a more avid hunter, I tried to avoid searches that included the word Star or Trek as that would inevitably show only the ridiculously overpriced sellers. I used searches with various permutations combining terms like Chess, Peter, Ganine, Classic, 1961, 1494, Pacific, Hollywood, and even honey or honeydripper. The term Classic tends to pull in many false hits, and I'd inevitably spend a great deal of time scrolling. I never thought to search for "G A N I N E". :-/

It's good to know that patience and persistence still pay off. Good luck!
 
Back
Top