SmilingOtter
Master Member
The Orville dealt with holodeck romance/addiction. Handled it pretty well IMO.
He was referring to being given a choice to go through with the dangerous procedure.Just rewatching ST3, and the part at the end, where Bones seems to say to Kirk, 'Hell of a time to ask' still plays back oddly every time I watch it, as if there was a deleted scene of Kirk asking a question, which warrants McCoy's sarcastic response. Does anyone know the story on that?
Yes, although there must be more to it like something happened in the editing room. He responds right away to the priestess and says he chooses the danger, then there's a shot of Kirk, then back to McCoy. Even the actors in the background seem to react very subtly with body swaying and slight turns of their heads, as if Kirk said something else to McCoy. Anyways...He was referring to being given a choice to go through with the dangerous procedure.
I always found it weird that no one really asked Bones if he was okay to go through the procedure, or laid out the dangers to him and Spock, until they got to Vulcan. I thought it was just a movie trope where they always "go over the plan" while they're on the mission.Just rewatching ST3, and the part at the end, where Bones seems to say to Kirk, 'Hell of a time to ask' still plays back oddly every time I watch it,
What I wanted to know, was in STIII, if it is so easy to automate a ship where only a bridge crew can operate it, why put so many people on it in the first place?
I always found it weird that no one really asked Bones if he was okay to go through the procedure, or laid out the dangers to him and Spock, until they got to Vulcan. I thought it was just a movie trope where they always "go over the plan" while they're on the mission.
Automation would not be sufficient for normal starship exploration or combat duties, but was fine for the return trip to Genesis, until they were attacked anyway.What I wanted to know, was in STIII, if it is so easy to automate a ship where only a bridge crew can operate it, why put so many people on it in the first place?
Automation would not be sufficient for normal starship exploration or combat duties, but was fine for the return trip to Genesis, until they were attacked anyway.
Well, in all fairness to JJ Trek, while it was a fun action movie, they were a little light on caring about any Trek in-universe sci-fi continuity. I mean, the entire fleet leaves for Vulcan, gets there and gets destroyed, all in the time it takes the Enterprise to get there (in the course of a conversation).Last night I turned on the first JJ Trek and it only had about an hr left. Am I imaging things or towards the end did the Enterprise show up at Saturn and beam crew to the ship around Earth? If that's right, W.T.F.? That's idiotic.
Submerging the Enterprise
Agreed. I could easily accept that the Enterprise COULD do it. But there was no explanation, reasonable or otherwise, as to WHY that was necessary rather than staying in orbit, other than "it'll look SOOOOOO COOOOOOL!"This is one of those things that most fans would accept without question, if the rest of the surrounding movie was good. For example, the questionable stuff in TWOK gets a pass because the movie they are in is awesome.
But you have no idea what occurred to get them there . It would be like starting an episode of classic trek in the last 10 minutes and saying this makes no sense.For me personally, the Enterprise emerging from an underwater hiding spot still seems pointless when they could have remained in orbit or nearby, no matter how well the story was written.