I don’t think we’ll get a Sisko cameo, but I think it’s pretty likely we’ll get a visit to DS9. Hell, I wouldn’t be surprised if we saw the female changeling. She should be in a Federation prison at this point.
Crocodile tears all round.
I’ve said it before. STD is the perfect acronym, because it’s painful to experience and embarrassing to talk about.and a lot of people making reference to Discovery, can we please refer to it by the official acronym, STD?
I don’t think that’s a fair characterization at all. “Schlock” is a word we reserve for Plan 9 From Outer Space, Groove Tube, Death Race 2000–IOW, movies that feature low (or no) production value and amateurish writing, and often contain cheap shocks or thrills. I wouldn’t even call Strange New Hair schlock, and I absolutely hate it. I would even argue that Romero’s first three Dead pictures are schlocky. But not Picard 3. You might think it’s bad, and you might make a good argument for it (and I would vehemently disagree), but that’s just not the right word.This season is schlock, but it's highly entertaining schlock, so I'm enjoying the hell out of it.
No way in hell that is gonna happen…..with the involvement of the changelings, what are the odds we're going to get a Sisko cameo. All that "organic matter in the nebula" talk had me itching the great emissary might return somehow. Would be a great way to bring him back, at least for me, always loved his arc.
No way in hell that is gonna happen…..
I have had the pleasure of talking with him a few times, the first was when He was doing location shooting in D.C. for, “A Man Called Hawk” Series and he is truely a very unique individual.Not unless they allow Avery Brooks to film all of his scenes sitting in front of his piano riffing….
I love Sisko, but Mr. Brooks is a unique soul, it seems.
I came across this video recently. Do you guys feel this is the correct assessment of Star Trek currently and if Terry is the right guy to lead Trek back to how good it was? Or do you feel this is all incorrect?
I came across this video recently. Do you guys feel this is the correct assessment of Star Trek currently and if Terry is the right guy to lead Trek back to how good it was? Or do you feel this is all incorrect?
Do you think Terry is the right way to go, since Season 3’s minor improvement is his doing?It’s far too soon to say “STAR TREK IS BACK!!”
Yes, the current season of Picard is certainly better than the first two seasons of the show—which is an extremely low bar to be measured against. The over-reaction to the change in the series as being the rescue of the entire franchise is a bit much…so far…
Picard is still a series full of modern (Nu) Star Trek tropes, member berries, easter eggs, elements taken from prior stories, inconsistent characterizations, clunky story telling, etc. But—yes, it is still better than seasons 1 and 2 and all of Discovery and Strange New Worlds.
And there is still the specter and stench of Secret Hideout hanging over the franchise.
No—Roddenberry Trek is not yet back. But, there is a small glimmer of hope that things could continue to get better. The cancellation of Discovery may represent the start of a broader course correction.
Do you think Terry is the right way to go, since Season 3’s minor improvement is his doing?
I would have to wait to see the entire Season 3 of Picard to give my opinion.
He certainly appears to be better than Kurtzman, Paradise, and Goldsman.
... and Chabon.
Well…while we’re at it, former Discover show runner Brian Fuller should be included in that group, as well, since he created a lot of the foundation for what was later produced…
![]()