It's not them that's funny. It's the stupidity of the script that's funny. They're just pointing it out.
Wrong, the script was very tight, one can take issue with the story and plot.
It's not them that's funny. It's the stupidity of the script that's funny. They're just pointing it out.
That's pretty much what I have been saying. Good action flick, bad Trek.
I don't really think they're trying to be funny as in ha ha ha funny. They're just talking about movies like will all do and pointing out the flaws in the story and characters. Some of it is funny because they hit the nail right on the head and illuminate a particularly ill conceived plot point or concept.
It's not them that's funny. It's the stupidity of the script that's funny. They're just pointing it out.
Is it just me? I have never found these guys funny...at all.
Yeah you're pretty much the only person who doesn't find RLM both insightful and hilarious.
Yeah you're pretty much the only person who doesn't find RLM both insightful and hilarious.
Maybe I don't count, but I don't find them to be either. I think they are a criminally unfunny, interpretively mediocre, total waste of bandwidth.
The fact that so much of fandom uses them as actual justification for their shallow objections is, honestly, embarassing.
heres something funny to point out - you paid money to see Trek 09 and for the past couple if years youve complained about every aspect of Trek 09, then started complaining about STID before the movie was released, and yet once again paid money to see STID, now youre complaining about STID after seeing it, and im guessing youll start complaining about the next trek film before its released, and ONCE AGAIN plop down money to see it and continue complaining about it.
Wrong, the script was very tight, one can take issue with the story and plot.
I'm sorry. I was under the impression that the script contained the story and plot. After all, when an actor says they don't like the script, it usually doesn't involve how someone went from point A to point B. If all a script needed to be was "tight" in order to be good, no would bother writing stories or plot.
The fact that so much of fandom uses them as actual justification for their shallow objections is, honestly, embarassing.
They certainly put more thought into the actual movie than the writers and director did.
It's ok to just acknowledge your error and move on.
Clearly you don't know much about the business of film production.
Maybe I don't count, but I don't find them to be either. I think they are a criminally unfunny, interpretively mediocre, total waste of bandwidth.
The fact that so much of fandom uses them as actual justification for their shallow objections is, honestly, embarassing.
I think it's more like a case that many people just came to their own conclusions about the movie and simply agree with their assessment. They're not shallow objections any more than your insights on the movie are a deep and intellectual commentary. No need to not so subtlety try to insult those that don't agree with your opinion.
And what would you say if I had downloaded this film or sneaked into the theater without paying?
I mean, what else would the alternative be?
To not going to see the film?
Well, where would that leave me with my favorite franchise since these movies are the only new Star Trek "things" being made?
So please Saber, if you don't like sitting next to a guy complaining about broccoli, move to a different table.
gee i dunno....maybe DONT GO SEE a movie that you think is stupid? lol
Sorry, but I don't use the "film business" card to excuse crappy writing.