+1 foil.Well Bandai have raised the bar, & Round2 have reached it with the detail on this kit, can’t wait to have this in my collection
Now, will I use paint or foil?
John
I do agree, but a small word of caution: the Razor Crest is is a mock-up, and not a test shot.And to think that people were worried that they would not be able to get the details right or sharp. People doubting they could ever compete with Bandai
And for one thing, I am looking forward to a traditional glue kit. If this was a Bandai kit, the would be a ton of extra parts needed for the snap fit, and there will probably be a lot more room in this for an interior and lighting without need to cut away a lot of stuff
Round 2 newly tooled kits are light years ahead of the old MPC days. Many just do not realize it outside of the Space 1999 side of things
View attachment 1490881View attachment 1490883View attachment 1490882View attachment 1490880
It looks like a kit to me. It's obvious it was assembled for him, partly, but you can see seams where parts connect. When his camera focuses, you can see the sharp lines and intricate details.I do agree, but a small word of caution: the Razor Crest is is a mock-up, and not a test shot.
I have both the ancient AMT Excelsior and the Round 2 repop. I should drag them both out of my stash and take some side to side comparison pics.Oh, for the luvva... When amt re-worked the tool of their NCC-2000-version Excelsior model kit into the Enterprise-B, it was a permanent alteration. Polar Lights -- and, later, Round2 -- Had to reverse-engineer those back into the Excelsior -- and decided to do it as the NX-2000 version this time. Some parts are the same, but they did a good job matching the old amt tool... Unfortunately. *lol* It wasn't the most accurate. More recently they did the Grissom and Bird-of-Prey as a two pack. Both snap models. Both what I would call Bandai quality for fit, accuracy, and detail. They've also reworked a lot of smaller amt kits into snap kits.
Imagine if they had totally overhauled the MPC Falcon, instead of just the sidewalls.Oh, for the luvva...
I never understood the leeriness at this announcement. The final Razor Crest will be just as nice as the test article. They'll find the right way to do it to capture everything while not making things as fiddly as the FineMolds Falcon.
Give it some time John, they probably will do an all new one.Imagine if they had totally overhauled the MPC Falcon, instead of just the sidewalls.
Having the hull curvature, the mandible length & basic greeblies fixed, all with the minimum of parts to build, basically the same number of kit parts as the original kit
J
You are right. It will be very nice. Will it be as perfect as a high precision 3D print, only time will tell.Oh, for the luvva... When amt re-worked the tool of their NCC-2000-version Excelsior model kit into the Enterprise-B, it was a permanent alteration. Polar Lights -- and, later, Round2 -- Had to reverse-engineer those back into the Excelsior -- and decided to do it as the NX-2000 version this time. Some parts are the same, but they did a good job matching the old amt tool... Unfortunately. *lol* It wasn't the most accurate. More recently they did the Grissom and Bird-of-Prey as a two pack. Both snap models. Both what I would call Bandai quality for fit, accuracy, and detail. They've also reworked a lot of smaller amt kits into snap kits.
Then there are their glorious huge high-detail 1:350 kits of the NX-01, NCC-1701, -1701 refit, and K't'inga that I'd put on par with any of the big Gundam kits or the PG Millennium Falcon.
I never understood the leeriness at this announcement. The final Razor Crest will be just as nice as the test article. They'll find the right way to do it to capture everything while not making things as fiddly as the FineMolds Falcon.