Questions About Bond Films that You Have been Afraid to Ask SPOILERS

Well sure I know that, but the fact remains that since FYEO Roger kept getting lured back and they always had a script ready with 'his' Bond in mind. That's why I believe there was much more goofiness in TLD as opposed to LTK

Me personally I would have loved Dalton in AVTAK (or even earlier)
 
I don't think there's as much goofiness in TLD. Certainly not compared to other Moore entries. It's not as dark as LTK, but it's still got some edge to it. I mean, let's not forget that Bond's initial job that starts the film is counter-sniper duty, at the end of which he says "I only kill professionals!"
 
A good line indeed- I think even Roger himself has a similar one in TMWTGG- along the lines of 'when I kill it's under the direct orders of Her Majesty's Government'. I loved Moore's Bond when he was no nonsense like that!

Here's an unrelated question (forgive me if it's been asked) Is it true that when Never Say Never Again was in pre-production, the film makers wanted George Lazenby to return- and it was only when Connery expressed interest that the idea was dropped?
That could have had potential-- I mean he is nearly 10 years younger, and I for one would certainly have loved to see George do at least one more movie

As far as I know it was only a rumor- but the idea fascinated me. In fact, I'm also a member of a Bond forum and on it they have a 'fan art' section. I made this one:

LazenbyNSNA2.jpg



That's George more or less around 1980-85. He still had the look!
 
So much so, in fact, that he was busy playing "JB" in The Return of the Man From Uncle: The 15 Years Later Affair.
 
Hey there, I just found this thread now.

I'd like to add my opinion on OHMSS, it is absolutely one of my favourite Bond flicks for many reasons. In high school my best friend was a huge Bond fan and he got me into them pretty heavily. OHMSS wasn't really one of his favs, in fact he liked it as little as he acknowledged NSNA(He disowned it, not being a United Artist release). However, when I saw OHMSS, something about it just clicked with me. It had a 'feeling' to me that the others before(except FRWL) and since, never really re-captured in my mind.

I totally understand all the praise/criticisms with OHMSS, but there seemed to be a new formula that was applied to the style of directing and the action sequences that seemed to me to be more 'high-stakes' and more 'intense'. It also seemed to cover quite a few aspects of the 'Bond persona' that I had wanted to see.

Through his vast knowledge of science, Lepitoptery(impressing M), to his impersonation of a genealogist and the writers adding in a brief history of the 'Bond' coat of arms 'The World is Not Enough' (nice precursor there), I even found the 'gold balls' innuendo totally clever.

The locations and sets were great(they usually are) I love Bond in Switzerland, Germany or Austria.

Telly Savalas is by far my favourite Blofeld. Also, the whole Blofeld lineage story arc was fantastically done. His cordial relationship with Bond as an 'imposter' was well acted.

Lazenby's acting was excellent(IMO) considering he hadn't done much acting at all prior to that(Wasn't he a model?).

The action scenes were handled differently, I think the fast cut editing and the sped up film technique for the fight sequences was fairly new at the time(1969).

I really enjoyed the Draco character(a criminal) being an instrumental character in Bond's success of the rescue of his daughter Tracy(he knew Bond had grown to love her) and the destruction of Blofeld's base and the brief interaction between Draco and M in the wedding scene was really, really cool.

One of my hands-down favourite Bond scenes of all time, is when Bond returns to Blofeld's chalet at the end, and there's that sequence where he's sliding down the curling court with the submachine gun, firing as he's sliding...damn! I think that's still unrivalled today!
Also, I thought the way they had Bond snapping pictures of Blofeld's 'attack centre' with the different girls who were being planted in various parts of the world was very, very cool.
The luge chase was really cool. Then the whole murdering of his wife, that was really, really dark and then the film just ends there.

I could definitely use another viewing of the Timothy Dalton bonds. I had the pleasure of actually visiting the Prater Amusement park when I was in Vienna a few years back.

I'm not a fan of Roger Moore as Bond, although, he definitely had 'the look' no doubt. It was just unfortunate that Moore was older than Connery was when Moore started out with Live and Let Die. That being said, I don't know why, but of the Roger Moore bonds, I like TMWTGG, it must be for 'Sunshine's' bikini and the other scenery.:lol

I hate to sound dismissive, but I don't care for the Pierce Brosnan bonds, he did a good job 'as Bond' it's just for some reason, they're not really memorable movies to me(IMO).

I acknowledge Connery, or 'Seannery' (as my buddy Nick jokingly calls him) as the 'classic' Bond.

I like Daniel Craig as Bond, he's an excellent actor, but there seems to be some missing charismatic traits that I can't quite put my finger on. He's definitely an excellent 'masculine' interpretation.

Anyway, that's my 2-cent introductory contribution to this thread.:)

In writing this, I think I'm going to start rewatching all the Bonds again(other than FRWL and OHMSS which I know too well)

-Andrew
 
Last edited:
Moonraker, when a lot of people saying the movie is bad, it turned out making the most profit of all Moore's.

I can't believe two movies after golden eye, Brosnan make lesser profit (oh maybe it has "except US" note), and DAD IMHO was not too good, made most profit. And Brosnan killed the bad guy most...Yay
 
Moonraker, when a lot of people saying the movie is bad, it turned out making the most profit of all Moore's.

You'll find in many cases the biggest box office comes to the movie AFTER a good one. IE: The highest grossing Bond film of all time when adjusted for inflation is Thunderball. Thunderball is great but it got those numbers because it came after Goldfinger.

Same is true for Moonraker. It came right after TSWLM which was one of the best Moore entries.

I can't believe two movies after golden eye, Brosnan make lesser profit (oh maybe it has "except US" note), and DAD IMHO was not too good, made most profit.

Keep in mind that the numbers here are not inflation adjusted which is huge. You'll also notice that the numbers are highly influenced by hype. With Goldeneye it was the new Bond and the first film in many years. With DAD it was the 40th anniversary.

And Brosnan killed the bad guy most...Yay

Ya, but he also used a machine guy more than any other Bond. Kinda cheating really. I like the up close and personal kills of earlier Bonds. :)
 
Back
Top