PREDATORS - MOVIE INFO

so if its in print then it is infallible but first person account is not.. ok i got it. ... pft


well you are not going to get a link to such an article because it was spoken word at a conference. the article you want is not proof either. writers and editors take liberties to get the readers attention or it is possible that they knowingly change info to get readers attention as well. so i dont understand why you wont take someones word over an article. they both can be flawed or they both can be correct. you just are choosing to not believe someones account. so dont go tell me what proof is.

and if you are wondering why people seem to be attacking you, it's because you are coming across as smug. you think you are not throwing insults and being the mature one, but you are being condescending which is just as much of a ad hoc argument as blatantly calling someone a douche.


i think you just got your panties in bunch when they took away your giant red font.

Yeah I was pretty disappointed to see them take away my choice of font. It is a freedom of speech and expression. If they don't want people to use it then it should not be made available. If people think the font I was using was annoying try the person who is complaining about it. To me it suggests they're on forums too much and can't see that it is simple words. If I were shouting it would look LIKE THIS in my font not like this which is what I was using. Also the font wasn't even the largest available. I chose to use a 6 font. Oh well. Some people. Heh. This forums' style resembles a dictatorship which sickens me. Then again it's not that big of a deal either. I can conform. As for the articles... that was just an idea of proof. Which also if I did read the "article" I'd be looking for quotes not just someone's review and opinion on a subject. By the way it doesn't just have to be in print. It could also be a video source. Often times when an interview is being conducted cameras and/or voice recorders are rolling. Thanks for your views. I hope you or anyone else isn't taking this to heart as I myself am not.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
epicfacepalm.jpg
 
hahahahaha Sabres that made me chuckle.
i have had a good read for the last 20 mins from this Safara dude. as you can see i read all your replies that were the same font as everyone elses, yet in that link you posted i pretty much skipped past your red font till i realised it was you. al i am saying is that blend in a ppl will notice you for your contributions to the lair. as it is all i remember you for now is not the red txt but the guy that needs proof even after it has been given.

come on, can;t we get back on topic now?
 
WTF???

2 pages of pissy banter?

Pack in the baiting before the mods get pissy!! You want to carry on being sarcastic to each other, use the PM system, not this thred. No one wants to see the thred go to hell, and it looks to be spiralling that way.

What has been quoted is the info we currently have and coming from RR has to be taken at face value. having said that, anyone who has read the alleged leaked script may think there is a chance of others ( withouth saying more )

guess we will have to just wait another 21 days.


( notice the above is in PRINT , so is correct. :p )
 
[bad lawyer hat]

Sabres has provided you with a direct source for the statement that was made - he has stated that he was personally present, that he asked the question and he has stated what Rodriguez's response was. Sabres has provided you with his proof that the statement was made and a source for the information ie himself. That proof is perfectly valid proof for the making of the statement.

The issue of whether you accept that proof is a matter of credibility. You're new to the forum, you don't know Sabres from a bar of soap, so you want a more credible source. Having the question and answer confirmed by a transcript or another source provides you with no better proof of that statement, arguably worse since they didn't participate in the conversation.

Rodriguez's statement is hearsay evidence if you wish to rely on Rodriguez' statement to Sabres to prove that what Rodriguez says was in fact true. The only way you'll get the proof you want is if Rodriguez shows up on your doorstep, shows you the uncut footage and the edited footage and then confirms that he personally enhanced the trailer with extra lasers.

Even then, it sounds like you might still doubt him.

[/bad lawyer hat]
 
ok ok 165 pages is hard to read through when you want predators stuff. deleting other posts to clean it up
 
I heard that the New Breed of Predators actually hunt for the DNA of other dangerous species and then combine them with their DNA. Anyone else hear anything like this?

Now this is interesting, munson - that would actually make some kind of sense, judging by the far-off...,err, abomination of the BSP facial features!
When I first saw the Mr. Black pics yesterday I was really disappointed in the design... still doesn´t work for me. :p
But then, as Lee and some other guys here said, we have to see him in motion... and when there is some hint that they´re looking like this because they experiment on themselves, yeah, I guess this would work for me!
 
But then, as Lee and some other guys here said, we have to see him in motion... and when there is some hint that they´re looking like this because they experiment on themselves, yeah, I guess this would work for me! :p

All i know is the classic predator looks very much like a predator wether it be a still photo or onscreen doing his worst. I think expecting that abomination to look more predator like onscreen may be a tad optimistic, we can always hope though As for the preds altering their DNA, pffft..... they are already the biggest bad asses in the universe, i prefer to think a pred that found a prey item he couldn't necessarily beat would rather stand tall and die trying than alter his own DNA to win?!
 
Somebody can step up and end this useless banter by providing a link to this interview where Rodriguez is said to have explained there will only be 3 predators in the film. Or don't. I don't really care THAT much. Just making a point. Anything else is just opinion, comment and unfound heresay.

One word: Google. I have heard that it does wonders if used correctly. You want proof that bad, go get it poncho. Multiple members here made statements concerning the number of Pred's in the movie.

My apologies Lee, just had too.
 
MasterSafara - You don't seem to know when to stop do you? I'm issuing you a warning and asking you cool your guns.

First, you need to respect people like sabres because his info is reliable and correct. If you took the time to see his previous posts, you'd see that he posts credible information long before it becomes available to the public. Sabres also happens to run the Hive which is a sister site to the Lair. He is a great source of information and an all-around nice guy. He's a member who has been around longer than most so please show some respect rather than coming here demanding that he show you come hard evidence.

Second, I'm not pursuing the issue of your large red text. I've already made it clear to you the reason why. If you'd like to pursue the issue via PM, feel free.

We aren't here to create arguments, but rather to discuss civilly like adults. If you don't like that, then the door is back where you came in...

NOW - back on topic about the movie PREDATORS which, by the way, is GOING TO KICK SOME SERIOUS ASS!!!
 
it certainly will kick ass for me no matter what the preds look like :p unless they are pink and sporting ballet tutu's...now that would be an abomination!
 
Back
Top