squirk
Master Member
Being that the movie takes place in the real world is exactly why I think the texture of the suit doesn't work for Superman. It should be fabric and not this rubbery get-up. The raised \S/ too. He's meant to have this gear on under his civilian wear after all, how does he hide that he's wearing a inch thick wet-suit with an embossed logo on the chest.
I think they do it for the sake of it now that they know it will show up in HD, and have the viewer in awe of the fine detail they can see in the picture. Looking at the clarity of the Reeve movies on the recent blu-rays release, there's a load of texure visible. The suit look great, practical and very real. I'd love to know where he hides the cape though.![]()
As iconic as it is seeing Clark rip open his dress shirt to reveal the shield underneath, I nonetheless like the idea that his costume is not a skin-tight unitard with briefs, like some kind of circus acrobat. Even if Martha Kent made the first costume and gave it an Earthly perspective, would she give it briefs in this day and age? Also, Kryptonian swaddling material doesn't have to look just like spandex.
Also, maybe what we're seeing is not the costume Clark started with. Maybe the original was destroyed in a fight with Zod and this is Suit 2.0.
And seriously, where was Clark hiding the cape, belt and boots in the classic costume, either? If they can explain that away, they can probably explain away how this new one is concealed.