PHArchivist
Master Member
Speaking from the acting side of things... sometimes (in my admittedly limited experience) the actor will have an idea of how he/she wants to deliver the line, but after a take or two the director will say, "Now, let's try it like this" or "Let's change that delivery so we have some options to choose from." And then it all gets sent to the editor, who might pick the take that looks best but doesn't necessarily have the best line delivery.
100% agree and understand...
In fact, it really makes you wonder when it comes to award winning (or p**s-poor) performances - how much credit should apply to the editor?
I'd imagine with the best actors, directors, and editors, there is a caliber, confidence, and synergy that will generate the best end result. But a cavalier or unskilled editor can really make or break an actor's performance, I suppose.