AdmiralBaxter
Sr Member
Now everyone has to go and modify their phasers and then we find out how useless the twistlock becameThe GJ appears to have had the modification, the pins are just missing but the holes are there.
Now everyone has to go and modify their phasers and then we find out how useless the twistlock becameThe GJ appears to have had the modification, the pins are just missing but the holes are there.
Actually they're very secure when you don't tamper with them, but I filed my prongs down to match the Jein, and then it became floppy.Now everyone has to go and modify their phasers and then we find out how useless the twistlock became
That makes sense too an extent, yet then we must ask ourselves why was the prongs on the Jein different? Most likely it was the first of the hero phasers to be built.Actually they're very secure when you don't tamper with them, but I filed my prongs down to match the Jein, and then it became floppy.
How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie-Pop? The world may never know.That makes sense too an extent, yet then we must ask ourselves why was the prongs on the Jein different? Most likely it was the first of the hero phasers to be built.
Two Hunded, 33an a thirrddddddddd.....How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie-Pop? The world may never know.![]()
No, you can tell by where they are positioned that it was intended for stability. IF it was for rewiring or bypass purposes they could have rebuilt/replaced the twist lock itself.It almost looks like it was a ‘bypass’ or additional + or - electrical prong. I wonder if one of the conductors was prone to failure so they added this?
I've never seen nor heard anyone talk about about those pins. Cool to know.I was about to see the same thing…it appears to be “friction fit”, when the handle is attached, to the side of the female part of the baklite plug.
I am wondering if that was added later in the series due to the twist lock becoming problematic during regular use…inadvertent twisting of the handle may have occurred causing the phaser II body to “flop” off the handle as a result?
View attachment 1840755View attachment 1840756
I actually think the Conscience / Lenore / Riley was the first one made because it has differences that neither the GJ or the TMOST have.That makes sense too an extent, yet then we must ask ourselves why was the prongs on the Jein different? Most likely it was the first of the hero phasers to be built.
It doesn’t go anywhere or connect to anything. John and I had a conversation about it. He told me how gloppy the Jein was and this one is like a rock so it can’t be anything but a lock to prevent movement.It almost looks like it was a ‘bypass’ or additional + or - electrical prong. I wonder if one of the conductors was prone to failure so they added this?
I know the front bottom screw is on the opposite side from the GJ and TMOST. What else ya got?I actually think the Conscience / Lenore / Riley was the first one made because it has differences that neither the GJ or the TMOST have.
You may very well be right.I actually think the Conscience / Lenore / Riley was the first one made because it has differences that neither the GJ or the TMOST have.
It has an additional screw on the back bottom and the emitter is strangely short along with the painted P1 release. Seems like this was the pathfinder. Also, it's in the early promo photos with Shatner so it may have been the first finished.I know the front bottom screw is on the opposite side from the GJ and TMOST. What else ya got?![]()
I've never seen nor heard anyone talk about about those pins. Cool to know.
I actually think the Conscience / Lenore / Riley was the first one made because it has differences that neither the GJ or the TMOST have.
I know the details for the various hero phasers, but asking me to name the phaser woooo that's one thing I never got down patIt has an additional screw on the back bottom and the emitter is strangely short along with the painted P1 release. Seems like this was the pathfinder. Also, it's in the early promo photos with Shatner so it may have been the first finished.
View attachment 1840786
It doesn’t go anywhere or connect to anything. John and I had a conversation about it. He told me how gloppy the Jein was and this one is like a rock so it can’t be anything but a lock to prevent movement.
No, there is ONE scene in "The Enemy Within" when Sulu removes the handle and puts on a new one . . . . unless my memory is faulty, which is possible!!! Funny, if you watch the scene, he actives the P2 emitter light while doing it! whoops!! lol It's one of the scenes when they are freezing down on the planet while warming the rocks. It's pretty quick and kind of dark but the white handle helps see it.At first glance, the whole thing might seem like an inconvenience—having to twist the handle on, apply the pins, then close the shells up, but the removable twist-lock handle was never seen onscreen. The only times they’d have needed to open the shells up or remove the handle would be to repair/adjust the internal mechanisms or to change the batteries in the handle (which could still be done while the handle was attached, but probably wouldn’t be a great idea).
When we DID see the handles separately from the P2 bodies onscreen (in “The Galileo Seven” and “The Omega Glory”), they were separate, non-functional, fiberglass castings.