I've received this argument both from the auction house and a news outlet now. Granted, it's probably not too often that a subject's definitive reference source is a discussion forum, but when it comes to Star Wars props... the impression I've gotten for years is that the RPF is pretty much that. If the DL-44 builders group members are not the go-to experts in this case, then next to the Lucasfilm Archives (with whom I understand several members have consulted), WHO IS?
It would be one thing if the argument cited an alternative independent authority disagreeing with the RPF's consensus, but I've yet to see that.
Yep...
Only 11 plus years of studying this prop that has uncovered the true build and original parts used to fabricate it and replicated it down to the thousandth of an inch including all it's dings and scratches and undeniable photographic proof of it's history and molds and castings.
But go ahead. Believe someone who said he didn't even know of the movie until the year 2000.
"Experts" have been fooled or allowed themselves to be fooled countless times in this and the art world. Many paintings in museums and collections are fake. And they know it. Where there is a profit to be made there will be corruption.
If the buyer hired someone to look for proof... it is out there. (here) The bigger claims can be easily dismissed leaving the scope and rings plus. Still a great find and value, but not Han Solo's Blaster.
As per their claims to be one of the set used Han Solo Blasters. Show us the photo proof. Must be Held by Ford on set in a scene on camera.
Can't be hidden in a box or pocket of the prop guy.
There is a huge difference in value for production built vs screen used items.
It is very easy to look at the film and archive pre and post promo images ESPECIALLY for the LF Archive where they have HQ clear images and see that every image is of the same 2813 HERO Mauser.
Now maybe they will pick a shot where FORD is a mile away from the camera running with a blur and claim THAT is the PS Mauser in that shot...
Sure it is... now go away and eat a cookie...
If Tony and RIA and Disney ( laugh) actually have some super double- secret (unaltered) photo proof that shows' THAT PS Mauser, dressed with full greeblies, scope and mount and mystery disc on set and screen in Ford's hands I will offer a sincere apology. ; )
BTW.
Carl, in the video, never says he made more than one blaster for Lucas. He said they had several c96 with cut barrels.
He said he brought "
the gun" along , showed it to GL, he said he liked it but wanted that and that and that...I brought
it back to the workshop, took this (FH) off a machinegun and fixed it and put it on here... he accepted
it ...
Always spoke of it in singular terms.
If the MG81 FHs are so Rare that the one on the PS is "feesibly" the HERO... How did they have 2-3 others to build 3 fully dressed guns as back-up as some claim they would need to have for film production?
Were there multiple NR gun kits? Or ST guns? or how about other SW gun props? Were there
always multiples.?
Just some Qs I would have for the interrogation,.. I mean interview... ; )