From Slashdot: The Copyright Battle Over Custom-Built Batmobiles

holtt

Active Member
Interesting post today on /. that's up this forum's alley.

The Copyright Battle Over Custom-Built Batmobiles - Slashdot

Here's the lead in quoted from the site...

"Eriq Gardner writes that Warner Brothers is suing California resident Mark Towle, a specialist in customizing replicas of automobiles featured in films and TV shows, for selling replicas of automobiles from the 1960s ABC series Batman by arguing that copyright protection extends to the overall look and feel of the Batmobile. The case hinges on what exactly is a Batmobile — an automobile or a piece of intellectual property? Warner attorney J. Andrew Coombs argues in legal papers that the Batmobile incorporates trademarks with distinctive secondary meaning and that by selling an unauthorized replica, Towle is likely to confuse consumers about whether the cars are DC products are not. Towle's attorney Larry Zerner, argues that automobiles aren't copyrightable. 'It is black letter law that useful articles, such as automobiles, do not qualify as "sculptural works" and are thus not eligible for copyright protection,' writes Zerner adding that a decision to affirm copyright elements of automotive design features could be exploited by automobile manufacturers. 'The implications of a ruling upholding this standard are easy to imagine. Ford, Toyota, Ferrari and Honda would start publishing comic books, so that they could protect what, up until now, was unprotectable.'"
 
Clearly the topic of a prop maker getting shut down by IP owner isn't something people here are interested in - my mistake :)
 
This is an interesting topic and I'm keen to see where the case leads, but perhaps it is more suitable for the Off-Topic forum.
 
I'm interested in this. Wouldn't WB have had to take out a copyright on the Batmobile design to have claim over this? If not,then the first movie to ever use a particular model of car could claim copyright, and that car could not be used in any future movies.
 
warner would be shooting themselves in the foot with this. as it is now, there is no copyright on cars. there is copyright on certain car parts, that distinguish them from other cars. (like the porsche headlights etc). but these are registered form brands. and there is no brand on the batmobile (of any kind)
while there is the intellectual property of the design, that would be a totally different lawsuit.
anyway, if they would win on this, and this would conclude in a new "law", then they would not be allowed to use any cars in any movie anymore without permission for every single car. not just the ones featured, but also the ones barely visible.
someone didnt think this through
 
Back
Top