Disney planning to reboot the Indiana Jones franchise

I’m gonna play devils advocate…

I think it would be good for the next generations to have Indiana Jones adventures - the reality is they’re not gonna watch the original trilogy.

They’re just not. They look old and they sound old to young eyes

I’m 48 and I still think Raiders sounds the exactly same as the Indiana Jones stunt spectacular I saw at Universal Studios when I was eight.

Don’t get me wrong. I love these movies more than anything.

But I don’t care if they reboot it - it won’t be for me. It’ll be for the next generation.

And if it works good, they have their Indiana Jones.

If it doesn’t, who cares, I don’t watch the new Indiana Jones movies. I just watched the original trilogy. The new didn’t ruin the old for me. I don’t know why it ruins it for everyone else.

I just taught my class at a film school today and asked who’s seen diehard and not a single person had.

Only a few people had seen Star Wars.

Everyone has seen the Marvel movies.

Almost everyone saw sinners.

I show a clip from Indiana Jones and the last Crusade… in a section about choices characters make… I literally show the “choose, but choose wisely” scene.

I had to explain to a class of mid 20-year-olds the plot of Indiana Jones and the last Crusade

Who he was as a character.

AND THIS WAS A FILM SCHOOL.

Few of that gen and younger want to watch that trilogy - that’s for us. Let them have their own. Who cares?

(Yes I’m aware it’s more about the money grab from Disney than giving someone their own Indiana Jones, but I’m trying to take it from a different respective… maybe Indiana Jones should be as immortal as James Bond)
Tells me they dont take their career choice too seriously.
 
I th
You bring up the perfect point why it shouldn't be remade. Younger audiences have no connection with it, so who are the suits targeting a reboot at? A recasting that will piss off those who remember the originals, or the newbies who doesn't even know about the old movies and thus wouldn't really care. It's like nostalgia baiting people you aren't aiming for, while trying to lure in the newbies with something they have no connection to...

So... they might as well just make something new.

But the suits have no creativity - I remember a quote from the behind the scenes material for Alien 3, where the suits wanted 10 power loaders fighting 10 alien queens, because they thought that was the only thing that made Aliens a success. And less time and less money to make it.

But it's a great character... and the classic adventure in the style of Indy was such a big deal when I was a kid I'd take anything close to it... anything with treasure hunting... Romancing the Stone... DUCK TALES! I love treasure hunt movies... rooms of gold (I'd have LOVED Skeleton Crew as a kid - even more than I did as an adult).

Be a shame not to have Indy in another adventure flick, even if recast down the line...

As for the "failing the kids for lack of knowledge"... here ARE some of the "favorite movies" of this new class that I can remember...

E.T.
Sound of Music
Scott Pligrim
Cap Winter Soldier
The Natural
Anime I've never heard of and forgotten
Blade Runner
Toy Story
What's Eating Gilbert Grape
Shutter Island
How to Train Your Dragon

The rest I've forgotten

(BTW... this is always the best part of a new class... Asking what their fave flick is... get a real sense of their personalities off the bat in this interaction)

As part of the first term they also watch "Back to the Future"... and it's always wild. Every time, barely anyone has seen it... and they ALL get weirded out at the "mom trying to bang the son" moment. REALLY weirded out. Like it's all they take from it!

And one last thing off topic...

During my last class on "Auteurs", I played the clip from "The Abyss" when the water alien works its way through the ship... When Mary Elizabeth dips her finger in the water, licks it, it got such a reaction I was thrown.

when it ended one girl was like "HAHAHA WHAT MOVIE WAS THAT?!?!"

Only one girl had even HEARD of the Abyss....

Crazy.

And for the last class of that term the assignment was to edit a mood reel of what movies inspired them to go to film school in the first place (keep in mind this class is for CONCEPT ARTISTS) and of the 31 kids I'd say 25 of them were just montages of Anime.

Unless it was Miyazaki I had no idea what ANY of them were. Every student knew tho... and THEY were thrown when I'd ask "What flick was that clip from with the girl running around the lake? Neat animation"

THEIR Horror at me not knowing was about equal to my horror that no one had seen The Abyss.

Generations, man.
 
But it's a great character... and the classic adventure in the style of Indy was such a big deal when I was a kid I'd take anything close to it... anything with treasure hunting... Romancing the Stone... DUCK TALES! I love treasure hunt movies... rooms of gold (I'd have LOVED Skeleton Crew as a kid - even more than I did as an adult).

I checked myself a little when I realized that "Skeleton Crew" was a remake of the 23 year old Disney film "Treasure Planet".... which is a remake of the classic "Treasure Island."
 
1751927348225.png
 
I imagine if they do re-cast the actual character of Indy (not focus on a different character), that they'll go with a younger, up-and-coming actor rather than a big name. Chris Pratt seems a little too old and too big (requiring a big paycheck, that is). He's 46 years old, and I doubt filming would even start until 2027 at the earliest (assuming his schedule is even clear), making him close to 50 when the film could be released. Knowing that the studio would want sequels, you'd have Pratt being in his mid to late 50s for those. Not that a 50 year old couldn't play Indy - Ford obviously played Jones in his mid 60s for Crystal Skull and was around 80 for Dial of Destiny, but those films weren't received all that well. And Ford originated the character, so that's why he played him as an older actor. I'm not blaming the success of those movies on Ford's advancing years, but if the studios want to try to recapture the success of the original three films, they'll be looking for a younger actor for sure, likely someone closer to 30 than 50.

With that in mind, it's possible whoever would be cast isn't well known right now. Someone may pop on the scene in some upcoming indie movie (no pun intended) and start making a name for himself. I'd say it's more than likely that it'd be some actor appearing in a successful TV/streaming series. I also wouldn't be surprised if the actor was British or Australian, as is it seems like Hollywood casting directors love hiring actors from those places. So I really doubt any of the actors mentioned in this thread will fit the bill.
 
I imagine if they do re-cast the actual character of Indy (not focus on a different character), that they'll go with a younger, up-and-coming actor rather than a big name. Chris Pratt seems a little too old and too big (requiring a big paycheck, that is). He's 46 years old, and I doubt filming would even start until 2027 at the earliest (assuming his schedule is even clear), making him close to 50 when the film could be released. Knowing that the studio would want sequels, you'd have Pratt being in his mid to late 50s for those. Not that a 50 year old couldn't play Indy - Ford obviously played Jones in his mid 60s for Crystal Skull and was around 80 for Dial of Destiny, but those films weren't received all that well. And Ford originated the character, so that's why he played him as an older actor. I'm not blaming the success of those movies on Ford's advancing years, but if the studios want to try to recapture the success of the original three films, they'll be looking for a younger actor for sure, likely someone closer to 30 than 50.

With that in mind, it's possible whoever would be cast isn't well known right now. Someone may pop on the scene in some upcoming indie movie (no pun intended) and start making a name for himself. I'd say it's more than likely that it'd be some actor appearing in a successful TV/streaming series. I also wouldn't be surprised if the actor was British or Australian, as is it seems like Hollywood casting directors love hiring actors from those places. So I really doubt any of the actors mentioned in this thread will fit the bill.


It's the basic rule of James Bond casting: If the public is suggesting him, then he's already too old/established/expensive.

When they cast Harrison he was still "that guy from Star Wars." He had no other big popular roles yet.
 
Last edited:
I'm not remotely surprised about film students being unfamiliar with Indy.

Most people never see most shows outside their generation. Period.

It's not a matter of quality, or cultural importance, or even their interest in the art form. It's just the sheer number of hours in their life.
Well, I guess I'm part of a precious few whose father (amateur film maker/writer) was adamant about my education into the movie classics (all genres)! From American/European cinema, my week-ends and sometimes evenings, were filled with the "Need-to-see-that-movie!"
No discussion:p
 
This doesn't surprise me. Disney is always looking for new ways to burn several hundred million dollars to continue to weaken their company. Like Fantastic 4, they can make it, we will choose not to watch it.

But despite there prominent, money losing misfires, Disney and their affiliate companies have ALSO had some big hits. The live action Stitch film is about to gross $1 billion worldwide. Deadpool 3 is the largest grossing R rated movie... ever. Guardians 3 was a blockbuster, as was Inside Out 2 (>$1 billion).

And as much as bemoan the Star Wars sequel trilogy, the 3 films from 2015 to 2019 made over 4$ billion worldwide.
 
And as much as bemoan the Star Wars sequel trilogy, the 3 films from 2015 to 2019 made over 4$ billion worldwide.

Disney made money by killing a golden goose. They wrecked a valuable franchise with that trilogy. The profits declined hard over the 3 movies.

Tom Cruise is making 'Days of Thunder 2' now. I wouldn't be surprised if it makes more money than the next Disney SW movie. Imagine going back to 2012 (when Lucas sold SW to Disney) and explaining that to your younger self.
 
Last edited:
Well Disney's specialty is wokeness and ruining franchises. So a woke Indiana Jones is right up their alley. This one could beat Snow White for how much money it will lose.Hopefully this would be the straw that breaks the camels back and puts Disney out of business and out of our misery.
 
Well Disney's specialty is wokeness and ruining franchises. So a woke Indiana Jones is right up their alley. This one could beat Snow White for how much money it will lose.Hopefully this would be the straw that breaks the camels back and puts Disney out of business and out of our misery.
Funny how people can bleat on about "wokeness" like it is the end of days and yet you can't talk about other real world issues.

It won't happen. Disney won't go out of business just because you have an issue with something. There's a very vocal, angry part of the internet who don't like something and will rant on about it endlessly, for others they just accept that the world changes and carry on with their day.
 
Back
Top