Nice, thanks for sharing these photos!
Incoming wall of text.
I've been doing some more fabric searching on the net and I've found a few places that have a micro mesh in navy etc. Some differ slightly in the nylon/spandex ratio and I'm not really sure what the physical differences are between them. Either way, I bought a couple of meters of a 'Sheer Stretch Navy Blue Micro Mesh' (82% Nylon 18% spandex) from an Australian website called Glitter and Dance, not cheap at $18 a meter + shipping, but I really need a physical example of this stuff to compare with. (I almost bought a micro mesh from another website in America but they wanted $50 for the shipping!) The colour seems a bit...BLUE compared to some of the other navy colours I've come across which are a more desaturated, dark grey-ish navy, might just be the photograph, who knows.
Another thing I've been wondering is how sheer the material really is. We have a bunch of old clothes in the garage and I managed to find some black stockings (opaque unless stretched) and just some non-stretch, see-through, mesh fabric attached to a skirt. I modeled them over a skull so you can see.
Sitting on top.
Stretched stocking over skull.[img]
The difference? Under the sheer fabric you see everything, every crevice, and it's not even 'stretched', just sitting ontop. The stockings on the other hand only reveal whats pressed against the fabric and not much else, which I believe is the look we're trying to achieve. I have a feeling the sheer stretch mesh might be too transparent showing the outline of all the muscles attached to the under bodysuit regardless of the lighting.[/QUOTE]
Yes, and nice demonstration. The non-stretch sheer mesh in the first picture is very transparent, to the point where it creates no shadows against the fabric in the recessed areas. The stretched stocking is closer to the look of the material of the screen used suits, like I said on the first page, the translucency of the fabric wasn't immediately apparent until I saw the way the reflective surface shifted in the light from different angles and I moved in close, and the fabric was "more like pantyhose than UnderArmor." Up close it's discernible that the fabric is quite translucent and thin, but from a few feet back the density of the chainmail pattern makes the material seem more substantial than it is.
I don't have a skull handy, but here are some photos using a sword hilt and a sample of black Glissnet that I picked up from the fabric store. It still seems the closest to the in-person appearance of the fabric on the film suits out of all the samples I've tested.
When relaxed, the Glissnet doesn't immediately appear translucent, only when it's stretched taut or held up to the light. If you blindfold yourself with a piece of it, you can see well enough to count how many fingers a friend is holding up, but not well enough to read small text on a computer screen, like this post on the RPF. It has a very tight close weave like the fabric on the screen-used suits.
Sword:
[URL=http://s100.photobucket.com/user/Lunaman1/media/Man%20of%20Steel%20Fabric/20131208_233727_zpse4ff5211.jpg.html][IMG]http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m7/Lunaman1/Man%20of%20Steel%20Fabric/20131208_233727_zpse4ff5211.jpg[/URL]
Glissnet draped, relaxed:
Glissnet stretched taught, shows the steel on the highest areas, creates shadows in areas that are concave:
The highlights and lowlights shift in the light as the angle of observation changes:
For comparison, here's a sheer blue stretch mesh with a much more open weave. Easily translucent when draped, relaxed:
Fully transparent when stretched.