Probe Droid
Master Member
Re: Star Wars Episode VII
Just answering the man's question.
Just answering the man's question.
For all the hype he gets, I have been mightily unimpressed with JJ's direction and production abilities in pretty much everything of his I've seen. Mission Impossible 3 was...meh. Nothing special. Same story with MI4. Trek '09 and Into Darkness were...entertaining, but again, nothing special. I didn't watch LOST, but given how it ended, I don't plan to. I heard similar things about Alias.
Honestly, I'm just not all that impressed with him on the whole. He seems pretty derivative in much of his work, and where he goes for "big ideas" he lacks the wherewithal to execute them effectively.
HOWEVER
From watching Trek, it seems that he is uniquely suited to directing a Star Wars film. I would say that JJ Abrams is about as close to a young George Lucas as we're gonna get. Provided he's surrounded by enough people who will collaborate with him, I think we stand a good chance at getting a good Star Wars film out of him, that will get about as close to capturing the feel of the original trilogy as is possible in this day and age.
If you want to get that feeling again, I think JJ is pretty much the only source for it. He apes Spielberg and Lucas, sure, but he apes them better than just about anyone else, including both of them nowadays. He's not what they were when they were the golden gods of 70s and 80s cinema, but he's as close as we'll get to that long-gone era.
I think the only other person I'd really trust with the franchise would be Joss Whedon. But then I'd spend the movie trying to predict who he was gonna kill, which would be a pointless effort, since he'd probably have an out-of-control cloud car decapitate someone out of the blue rather than give them a hero's death.
You're very welcome, Brent.
And thank you for your continued blind devotion to a director like Abrams. I'm sure his films are just as important to the advancement of cinema like Michael Bay and Uwe Boll.
The way a friend of mines describes JJ is that he has creative ADD, he gets all hopped up on an idea, starts working on it for a while but then starts to lose interest as another idea hits, he then leaves the current project for others to finish while he moves on to his next project. You then rinse and repeat as he starts but never finishes any number of projects or, in the case of movies, loses steam and creative interest. It really makes a lot of sense when you look at just how many projects JJ seems to have going at any one time, at any one time he seems to be working on or at least overseeing 2 or 3 different TV shows, writing/directing a movie, and doing pre-production work for another movie.
What does "apes" mean?
Monkey see, monkey do, he copies them.
I think you hit the nail on the head here - JJ is much better suited for Star Wars and I think he will make it at the very least more entertaining and of a higher quality than the last three movies were. Hell the last two Star Trek movies basically were Star Wars movies so he already has some practice.
As someone who illogically looked forward with hope to the last two prequels only to have my hopes smashed apart by inept storytelling you would think I wouldn't have the slightest bit of interest in going through it all again but I have to admit I am slightly excited to go see episode VII/
Ok I'll give you the Bay comment, but bringing Uwe Boll into this was a hit below the belt! :lol
You never agreed with me on anything when it comes to past discussions, so I'm not surprised about your opinion of me. If having no hope for another SW film makes me seem to have a "bad attitude", then so be it.
Super 8 is probably the closest anyone has gotten to capture the feel & style of an 80's Spielberg movie
J
Pretty sure it does. In fact, that's practically a definition of the phrase.
Let me ask you this; what do you think you are contributing to this discussion? Just curious.
I'm contributing my concern about how this can be terrible, as there were many other directors more competent than Abrams that could make an excellent SW movie, which in turn is being met with "bitter 'Star Trek' fan" and other insults from Abrams fans who apparently think "because this is Abrams, it's good", when it could seriously be worse than the prequels.
So, here's my question: how is my concerns less valuable in discussion than the typical Abrams fan rant that is heavily posted in this thread?
They're not necessarily less valuable at all; its the accompanying attitude that I have the problem with. I think many of us would be interested to hear your viewpoints, but so far I've yet to find anything but snarky attacks and Uwe Boll comments. Expressing concern is valid, but straight-up negativity is not.
I'll be the first person to admit I never wanted, nor ever will want, another Star Wars movie. I think it's a silly idea. But since that isn't going to change, I'm trying to be positive about it instead of just focusing on doom and gloom. But whatever.
Super 8 is probably the closest anyone has gotten to capture the feel & style of an 80's Spielberg movie
J
I've been preaching this since I saw it in the theaters! Say what you want about the story, but you can't deny that this movie was an accurate and honorable tribute to Spielberg. This film came about as close to replicating a past era in film history as the mainstream will allow, and Abrams was very passionate about making it that way. To me, that's a sign that we're headed in the right direction. I've brought this up at least 3 times in this thread alone and always been ignored...
And I've noticed it's quite a coincidence that Super 8 has been mysteriously absent from the recent "look at what a hack JJ is" discussions.
The fact that you hate him already before youve seen a single shred of his movie proves my above statement.Your predetermined to hate it no matter what.
Ben